Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Location of the BCR/ABL Fusion Genes on Both Chromosomes 9 in Ph Negative Young CML Patients: An Indian Experience

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Hematology and Blood Transfusion Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The BCR/ABL gene rearrangement is cytogenetically visualized in most chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) cases. About 5–10 % of CML patients lack its cytogenetic evidence, however, shows BCR/ABL fusion by molecular methods. We describe two CML patients with Philadelphia (Ph) negative (−ve) and BCR/ABL positive by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Both the cases were in chronic phase at diagnosis. Conventional cytogenetics and different FISH assays were adopted using BCR/ABL probes. Home-brew FISH assay using bacterial artificial clone (BAC) for BAC-CTA/bk 299D3 for chromosomal region 22q13.31-q13.32 was performed in case 1. Both the patients were Ph-ve. In first case, dual color dual fusion (DCDF)-FISH studies revealed 1 Red (R) 2 Green (G) 1 Fusion (F) signal pattern in 80 % of cells indicating BCR/ABL fusion signals on chromosomes 9 instead of Ph and 2G2F signal pattern in 20 % of cells indicating two BCR/ABL fusions on both chromosomes 9q34 on presentation. In second case, FISH studies revealed the 1R1G1F signal pattern indicating BCR/ABL fusion signals on chromosomes 9 instead of Ph in 100 % of cells at presentation. During follow-up, both the patients exhibited 2G2F signal pattern indicating two BCR/ABL fusions on both chromosomes 9q34, which indicated a clonal evolution in 100 % cells. Both the patients did not achieve therapeutic response. Relocation of BCR/ABL fusion sequence on sites other than 22q11 represents a rare type of variant Ph, the present study highlights the hot spots involved in CML pathogenesis and signifies their implications in Ph−ve BCR/ABL positive CML. This study demonstrated the genetic heterogeneity of this subgroup of CML and strongly emphasized the role of metaphase FISH, especially in Ph−ve CML cases, as it detects variations of the classical t(9;22).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Heim S, Mitelman F (1995) Cancer cytogenetics, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York), pp 33–68

    Google Scholar 

  2. Verma RS, Chandra P (2000) Clinical significance of reverse BCR/ABL gene rearrangement in Ph negative chronic myelogenous leukemia. Leuk Res 24:631–635

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hagemeijer A, Buijs A, Smit E, Janssen B, Creemers G-J, Van der Plas D, Grosveld G (1993) Translocation of BCR to chromosome 9: a new cytogenetic variant detected by FISH in two Ph-negative, BCR-positive patients with chronic myeloid leukemia. Genes Chromosom Cancer 8:237–245

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Mohamed AN, Koppitch F, Varterasian M, Karanes C, Yao K-L, Sarkar FH (1995) BCR/ABL fusion located on chromosome 9 in chronic myeloid leukemia with a masked Ph chromosome. Genes Chromosom Cancer 13:133–137

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Takahashi N, Miura I, Ohshima A, Utsumi S, Nimura T, Hashimoto K, Saito M, Miura A (1996) Duplication of chromosome 9 carrying a BCR/ABL chimeric gene in Philadelphia chromosome negative chronic myeloid leukemia. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 89:166–169

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Reddy KS, Grove B (1998) A Philadelphia-negative chronic myeloid leukemia with a BCR/ABL fusion gene on chromosome 9. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 107:48–50

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sessarego M, Fugazza G, Bruzzone R, Ballestrero A, Miglino M, Bacigalupo A (2000) Complex chromosome rearrangements may locate the bcr/abl fusion gene sites other than 22q11. Hematologica 85:35–39

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Yehuda O, Abeliovich D, ben-Neriah S, Sverdlin I, Cohen R, Varadi G, Orr R, Ashkenazi YJ, Heyd J, Lugassy G, Yehuda DB (1999) Clinical implications of fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis in 13 chronic myeloid leukemia cases: Ph negative and variant Ph positive. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 114:100–107

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Vieira L, Alves AC, Marques B, Reis I, Jorge G, Ambrosio A, deSousa AB, Boavida MG (1999) Insertion of the 5 part of BCR within the ABL gene at 9q34 in a Philadelphia negative chronic myeloid leukemia. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 114:17–21

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Tanaka K, Arif M, Kyo T, Dohy H, Kamada N (2000) Transposition of duplicated chromosomal segment involving fused BCR–ABL gene or ABL oncogene alone in chronic myeloid leukemia and Ph chromosome positive acute leukemia with complex karyotypes. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 119:8–14

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Michalová K, Zemanová Z, Bkezinová J et al (2002) Location of the BCR/ABL fusion genes on both chromosomes 9q34 in Ph negative chronic myeloid leukemia. Leuk Lymphoma 43(8):1695–1700

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Dufva IH, Karle H, Brondum-Nielsen K et al (2005) Chronic myeloid leukaemia with BCR–ABL fusion genes located to chromosomes 9, cyclic leukocytosis and nodal T-lymphoblastic transformation–durable complete remission following imatinib therapy. Leukemia 19(4):671–673

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Verma RS, Babu A (1995) Human chromosomes. In: Verma RS, Babu A (eds) Manual of basic techniques. Pergamon Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  14. ISCN (2009) In: Shaffer LG, Slovak ML, Campbell LJ (eds) International system of human cytogenetic nomenclature. S Karger AG, Basel

    Google Scholar 

  15. Haigh S, Cuthbert G (2004) Fluorescence in situ hybridization characterization of different cryptic BCR/ABL rearrangements in chronic myeloid leukemia. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 155:132–137

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Morel F, Herry A, Bris M et al (2003) Contribution of fluorescence in situ hybridization analyses to the characterization of masked and complex Philadelphia chromosome translocations in chronic myelocytic leukemia. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 147:115–120

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Calabrese G, Stuppia L, Franhchi GP et al (1994) Complex Translocations of the Ph Chromosome and Ph negative CML Arise from similar mechanisms, as Evidenced by FISH analysis. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 78:153–159

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Brahmbhatt MM, Patel PS, Trivedi PJ et al (2010) Unusual location of BCR/ABL fusion gene in four CML patients with masked Philadelphia chromosome. Int J Med Med Sci 2(3):38–43

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Prabhudas S. Patel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brahmbhatt, M.M., Trivedi, P.J., Patel, D.M. et al. Location of the BCR/ABL Fusion Genes on Both Chromosomes 9 in Ph Negative Young CML Patients: An Indian Experience. Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus 30, 241–246 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12288-013-0316-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12288-013-0316-6

Keywords

Navigation