Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The effectiveness of moisturizer on acute radiation-induced dermatitis in breast cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 17 November 2022

This article has been updated

Abstract

Purpose

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the effectiveness of moisturizers on acute radiation dermatitis (ARD) in breast cancer patients receiving radiotherapy (RT).

Methods

PubMed, the Cochrane Library, CINAHL, and Ichushi-Web were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from April 2015 to March 2020. Assessments included type of intervention, cohort, outcomes, and quality of evidence. To evaluate the effect of moisturizer on ARD, we restricted analyses to studies comparing with standard skin care or no treatment. Outcomes were ARD severity and skin-related QOL (quality of life). Eligible studies were identified, and risk ratios and mean differences were extracted to compare outcome data.

Results

We screened 210 RCTs along with 14 studies included in a previous iteration of this analysis (2016), supplemented by a hand search (n = 9). Finally, we included 6 RCTs that investigated the effectiveness of standard type moisturizers in breast cancer patients receiving RT. Evidence (weak certainty) suggests that moisturizer use might reduce ≥ grade 3 ARD. QOL assessed by Skindex-16 improved with moisturizer use. Pain and pruritus measured by the visual analog scale (VAS) resulted in a smaller and nonsignificant difference in favor of moisturizer use. However, the certainty of the evidence was very weak in QOL.

Conclusions

The proactive use of moisturizer may play a role in reducing ARD and improving skin-related QOL, although the certainty of the evidence was weak to very weak. Future high-quality RCTs should be initiated to strengthen these results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

References

  1. Lee J, Park W, Choi DH, Huh SJ, Kim IR, Kang D, et al. Patient-reported symptoms of radiation dermatitis during breast cancer radiotherapy: a pilot study. Qual Life Res. 2017;26:1713–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ogita M, Sekiguchi K, Akahane K, Ito R, Haga C, Arai S, et al. Damage to sebaceous gland and the efficacy of moisturizer after whole breast radiotherapy: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Cancer. 2019;19:125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sekiguchi K, Ogita M, Akahane K, Haga C, Ito R, Arai S, et al. Randomized, prospective assessment of moisturizer efficacy for the treatment of radiation dermatitis following radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2015;45:1146–53.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Yoo GS, Kang D, Kim IR, Park H, Kim E, Cho WK, et al. Quantitative changes in skin composition parameters after radiation therapy according to surgery types among patients with breast cancer: a prospective study. Clin Breast Cancer. 2022;22:e224–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Campbell IR, Illingworth MH. Can patients wash during radiotherapy to the breast or chest wall? A randomized controlled trial. Clin Oncol. 1992;4:78–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Roy I, Fortin A, Larochelle M. The impact of skin washing with water and soap during breast irradiation: a randomized study. Radiother Oncol. 2001;58:333–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Wong RK, Bensadoun RJ, Boers-Doets CB, Bryce J, Chan A, Epstein JB, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the prevention and treatment of acute and late radiation reactions from the MASCC Skin Toxicity Study Group. Support Care Cancer. 2013;21:2933–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bolderston A, Lloyd NS, Wong RK, Holden L, Robb-Blenderman L. The prevention and management of acute skin reactions related to radiation therapy: a systematic review and practice guideline. Support Care Cancer. 2006;14:802–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. BC Cancer Agency. Symptom management guidelines: Radiation dermatitis. 2018. http://www.bccancer.bc.ca/health-professionals/clinical-resources/nursing/symptom-management. Accessed 1 Sep 2022.

  10. Nystedt KE, Hill JE, Mitchell AM, Goodwin F, Rowe LA, Wong FL, et al. The standardization of radiation skin care in British Columbia: a collaborative approach. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2005;32:1199–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. D’Haese S, Van Roy M, Bate T, Bijdekerke P, Vinh-Hung V. Management of skin reactions during radiotherapy in Flanders (Belgium): a study of nursing practice before and after the introduction of a skin care protocol. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2010;14:367–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology. Radiotherapy Q & A for patients and family, 2015 edition. Kanehara-shuppan: Tokyo; 2015 (in Japanese)

  13. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372: n71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Vogler BK, Ernst E. Aloe vera: a systematic review of its clinical effectiveness. Br J Gen Pract. 1999;49:823–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Behroozian T, Milton LT, Shear NH, McKenzie E, Razvi Y, Karam I, et al. Radiation dermatitis assessment tools used in breast cancer: a systematic review of measurement properties. Support Care Cancer. 2021;29:2265–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Cox JD, Stetz J, Pajak TF. Toxicity criteria of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1995;31:1341–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Minds Manual Developing Committee ed. Minds Manual for Guideline Development 2020 ver. 3.0. Tokyo: Japan Council for Quality Health Care; 2021 (in Japanese).

  18. Cochrane. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Version 6.2; 2021.

  19. Research Group for Development of the Appearance Care Guideline for Cancer Patients. 2016 Clinical Guide of Appearance Care for People Receiving Cancer Treatment. Kanehara & Co. Ltd.: Tokyo, Japan; 2016 (in Japanese).

  20. Thanthong S, Nanthong R, Kongwattanakul S, Laebua K, Trirussapanich P, Pitiporn S, et al. Prophylaxis of radiation-induced dermatitis in patients with breast cancer using herbal creams: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Integr Cancer Ther. 2020;19:1534735420920714.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ahmadloo N, Kadkhodaei B, Omidvari S, Mosalaei A, Ansari M, Nasrollahi H, et al. Lack of prophylactic effects of aloe vera gel on radiation induced dermatitis in breast cancer patients. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2017;18:1139–43.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Chitapanarux I, Tovanabutra N, Chiewchanvit S, Sripan P, Chumachote A, Nobnop W, et al. Emulsion of olive oil and calcium hydroxide for the prevention of radiation dermatitis in hypofractionation post-mastectomy radiotherapy: a randomized controlled trial. Breast Care (Basel). 2019;14:394–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sekiguchi K, Akahane K, Ogita M, Haga C, Ito R, Arai S, et al. Efficacy of heparinoid moisturizer as a prophylactic agent for radiation dermatitis following radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2018;48:450–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Williams MS, Burk M, Loprinzi CL, Hill M, Schomberg PJ, Nearhood K, et al. Phase III double-blind evaluation of an aloe vera gel as a prophylactic agent for radiation-induced skin toxicity. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1996;36:345–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Fenig E, Brenner B, Katz A, Sulkes J, Lapidot M, Schachter J, et al. Topical Biafine and Lipiderm for the prevention of radiation dermatitis: a randomized prospective trial. Oncol Rep. 2001;8:305–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Chren MM, Lasek RJ, Sahay AP, Sands LP. Measurement properties of Skindex-16: a brief quality-of-life measure for patients with skin diseases. J Cutan Med Surg. 2001;5:105–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Haruna F, Lipsett A, Marignol L. Topical management of acute radiation dermatitis in breast cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Anticancer Res. 2017;37:5343–53.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Sahin F, Pirouzpanah MB, Bijanpour H, Mohammadzadeh M, Eghdam Zamiri R, Ghasemi Jangjoo A, et al. The preventive effects of boron-based gel on radiation dermatitis in patients being treated for breast cancer: a phase iii randomized, double-blind. Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial Oncol Res Treat. 2022;45:197–204.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Akl E, Wiercioch NSW, the GRADE Working Group. 5. Quality of evidence. In: Schünemann H, Brożek J, Guyatt G, Oxman A, editors. GRADE Handbook; 2013

  30. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, Woodcock J, Brozek J, Helfand M, et al. GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence–inconsistency. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64:1294–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Shaitelman SF, Lei X, Thompson A, Schlembach P, Bloom ES, Arzu IY, et al. Three-year outcomes with hypofractionated versus conventionally fractionated whole-breast irradiation: results of a randomized. Noninferiority Clinical Trial J Clin Oncol. 2018;36:3495–503.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Pignol JP, Olivotto I, Rakovitch E, Gardner S, Sixel K, Beckham W, et al. A multicenter randomized trial of breast intensity-modulated radiation therapy to reduce acute radiation dermatitis. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:2085–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Hickey BE, James ML, Lehman M, Hider PN, Jeffery M, Francis DP, et al. Fraction size in radiation therapy for breast conservation in early breast cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;7:CD003860.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Lee CJ, Fang HF, Wang CY, Chou KR, Huang TW. Effect of hyaluronic acid on radiodermatitis in patients with breast cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Support Care Cancer. 2022;30:3965–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Kawamori J, Itazawa T, Fukushima S, Ito R, Yamauchi H, Sekiguchi K. Effect of heparinoid moisturizer on quality of life in patients with acute radiation skin damage following hypofractionated radiation therapy after breast-conserving surgery: a randomized controlled study. Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press). 2021;13:743–53.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ. 1997;315:629–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Sterne JA, Sutton AJ, Ioannidis JP, Terrin N, Jones DR, Lau J, et al. Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2011;343: d4002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Easterbrook PJ, Berlin JA, Gopalan R, Matthews DR. Publication bias in clinical research. Lancet. 1991;337:867–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Both H, Essink-Bot ML, Busschbach J, Nijsten T. Critical review of generic and dermatology-specific health-related quality of life instruments. J Invest Dermatol. 2007;127:2726–39.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Kawakami T, Soma Y. Questionnaire survey of the efficacy of emollients for adult patients with atopic dermatitis. J Dermatol. 2011;38:531–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Verdier-Sevrain S, Bonte F. Skin hydration: a review on its molecular mechanisms. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2007;6:75–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Borak J, Leddy ET. The Radiation Biology of the Cutaneous Glands. Radiology. 1936;27:651–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Cui Z, Xin M, Yin H, Zhang J, Han F. Topical use of olive oil preparation to prevent radiodermatitis: results of a prospective study in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015;8:11000–6.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Saito M, Hayashi K. The effect of moisturizing cream for radiation dermatitis—use the moisturizing cream for patients undergoing head and neck irradiation. 2015;29:14-23 (in Japanese).

  45. Abbas H, Bensadoun RJ. Trolamine emulsion for the prevention of radiation dermatitis in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Support Care Cancer. 2012;20:185–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Olsen DL, Raub W Jr, Bradley C, Johnson M, Macias JL, Love V, et al. The effect of aloe vera gel/mild soap versus mild soap alone in preventing skin reactions in patients undergoing radiation therapy. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2001;28:543–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Ginex P, Backler C, Croson E, Horrell L, Moriarty K, Maloney C, et al. Radiodermatitis in patients with cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2020;47:E225–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Aspects of this study were presented at the 30th annual meeting of the Japanese Breast Cancer Society, June 30-July 2, 2022, in Yokohama, Japan. The authors are grateful to Martin Guppy Ph.D. for editorial support.

Funding

This study was supported in part by the Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (20EA1016) from the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare, Japan.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kenji Sekiguchi.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The original online version of this article was revised to replace the wrong supplementary file 3 (12282_2022_1403_MOESM3_ESM) with the correct file.

Supplementary Information

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sekiguchi, K., Sumi, M., Saito, A. et al. The effectiveness of moisturizer on acute radiation-induced dermatitis in breast cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Breast Cancer 30, 2–12 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-022-01403-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-022-01403-8

Keywords

Navigation