Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Clinicopathological features of young patients (<35 years of age) with breast cancer in a Japanese Breast Cancer Society supported study

  • Special Feature
  • Breast cancer in young women: Issues and perspectives regarding patients' and survivors' care
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

To clarify the clinicopathological features of breast cancer in young females, surveillance data of the Registration Committee of the Japanese Breast Cancer Society were analyzed.

Methods

The clinicopathological characteristics were compared between young (<35) patients and non-young (≥35) patients among 109,617 records registered between 2004 and 2009.

Results

The numbers of young and non-young patients were 2,982 (2.7 %) and 106,295 (97.0 %), respectively. The young patients had more cases of a familial history of breast cancer, more subjective symptoms, fewer bilateral tumors, lower BMIs, larger tumors, more positive lymph nodes, fewer instances of an ER-positive status, more instances of an HER2-positive status, more triple-negative tumors and more advanced TNM stages. The young patients more frequently received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and breast-conserving therapy (BCT) compared with the non-young patients. Eighty percent of all patients received adjuvant therapy. The young patients were more frequently treated with chemotherapy, molecular targeted therapy and radiation therapy than the non-young patients.

Conclusions

In this study, young patients with breast cancer were diagnosed at more advanced stages and had more endocrine-unresponsive tumors than non-young patients. Further prognostic analyses should be conducted in this cohort.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Matsuda T, Marugame T, Kamo KI, Katanoda K, Ajiki W, Sobue T. Cancer incidence and incidence rates in Japan in 2006: based on data from 15 population-based cancer registries in the monitoring of cancer incidence in Japan (MCIJ) project. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2012;42:139–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Anders CK, Hsu DS, Broadwater G, Acharya CR, Foekens JA, Zhang Y, et al. Young age at diagnosis correlates with worse prognosis and defines a subset of breast cancers with shared patterns of gene expression. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(20):3324–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gonzalez-Angulo AM, Broglio K, Kau SW, Eralp Y, Erlichman J, Valero V, et al. Women age <35 years with primary breast carcinoma disease features at presentation. Cancer. 2005;103:2466–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ahn SH, Son BH, Kim SW, Kim SI, Jeong J, Ko SS, et al. Poor outcome of hormone receptor positive breast cancer at very young age is due to tamoxifen resistance: nationwide survival data in Korea-A report from the Korean Breast Cancer Society. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:2360–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Aebi S, Gelber S, Castiglione-Gertsch M, Gelber RD, Collins J, Thürlimann B, et al. Is chemotherapy alone adequate for young women with oestrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer? Lancet. 2000;27:1869–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Colleoni M, Rotmensz N, Robertson C, Orlando L, Viale G, Renne G, et al. Very young women (<35 years) with operable breast cancer: features of disease at presentation. Ann Oncol. 2002;13(2):273–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Pronzato P, Mustacchi G, DeMatteis A, Di Costanzo F, Rulli E, Floriani I, et al. Biological characteristics and medical treatment of breast cancer in young women—a featured population: results from the nora study. Int J Breast Cancer. 2011, Article ID 534256, doi:10.4061/2011/534256.

  8. Pagani O, O’Neill A, Castiglione M, et al. Prognostic impact of amenorrhoea after adjuvant chemotherapy in premenopausal breast cancer patients with axillary node involvement: results of the International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG) Trial VI. Eur J Cancer. 1998;34:632–40.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. The Japanese breast cancer society. General roles for clinical and pathological recording of breast cancer.16th ed. Histological Classification of breast tumors. Tokyo: The Japanese breast cancer society; 2008. 18–59.

  10. The World Health Organization. World Health Organization histological typing of breast tumors. Am J Clin Pathol. 1982;78:806–16.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Harvey JM, Clark GM, Osborne CK, Allred DC. Estrogen receptor status by immunohistochemistry is superior to the ligand-binding assay for predicting response to adjuvant endocrine therapy in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17:1474–81.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Umemura S, Kurosumi M, Moriya T, Oyama T, Arihiro K, Yamashita H, et al. Immunohistochemical evaluation for hormone receptors in breast cancer: a practically useful evaluation system and handling protocol. Breast cancer. 2006;13:232–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Leong SP, Shen ZZ, Liu TJ, Agarwal G, Tajima T, Paik NS, et al. Is breast cancer the same disease in Asian and Western Countries? World J Surg. 2010;34(10):2308–24.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Howlader N, Noone AM, Krapcho M, Neyman N, Aminou R, Altekruse SF, et al. SEER cancer statistics review, 1975–2009 (Vintage 2009 Populations), National Cancer Institute. Bethesda, MD, http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2009_pops09/, based on November 2011 SEER data submission, posted to the SEER web site, 2012.

  15. Yoshimoto M, Tada K, Hori H, Morota A, Tanabe M, Nishimura S, et al. Improvement in the prognosis of Japanese breast cancer patients from 1946 to 2001-an institutional review. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2004;34(8):457–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Saeki T, Sano M, Komoike Y, Sonoo H, Honjyo H, Ochiai K, et al. No increase of breast cancer incidence in Japanese women who received hormone replacement therapy: overview of a case-control study of breast cancer risk in Japan. Int J Clin Oncol. 2008;13(1):8–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. http://www.mhlw.go.jp/topics/bukyoku/kenkou/seikatu/himan/number.html.

  18. Sugano K, Nakamura S, Ando J, Takayama S, Kamata H, Sekiguchi I, et al. Cross-sectional analysis of germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in Japanese patients suspected to have hereditary breast/ovarian cancer. Cancer Sci. 2008;99(10):1967–76.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Shi YX, Xia Q, Peng RJ, Yuan ZY, Wang SS, An X, et al. Comparison of clinicopathological characteristics and prognoses between bilateral and unilateral breast cancer. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2012;138(4):705–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Iwase H, Kurebayashi J, Tsuda H, Ohta T, Kurosumi M, Miyamoto K, et al. Clinicopathological analyses of triple negative breast cancer using surveillance data from the Registration Committee of the Japanese Breast Cancer Society. Breast Cancer. 2010;17:118–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Anders CK, Fan C, Parker JS, Carey LA, Blackwell KL, Klauber-DeMore N, et al. Breast carcinomas arising at a young age: unique biology or a surrogate for aggressive intrinsic subtypes? J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(1):e18–20.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Saji S, Hiraoka M, Tokuda Y, Fukui N, Ikeda T. Trends in local therapy application for early breast cancer patients in the Japanese Breast Cancer Society Breast Cancer Registry during 2004–2009. Breast Cancer. 2012;19:1–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Freedman RA, Virgo KS, Labadie J, He Y, Partridge AH, Keating NL. Receipt of locoregional therapy among young women with breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012;135(3):893–906.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Buzdar AU, Ibrahim NK, Francis D, Booser DJ, Thomas ES, Theriault RL, et al. Significantly higher pathologic complete remissionrate after neoadjuvant therapy with trastuzumab, paclitaxel, and epirubicin chemotherapy: results of a randomized trial in human epidermal growth factorreceptor 2-positive operable breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:3676–85.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Gianni L, Dafni U, Gelber RD, Azambuja E, Muehlbauer S, Goldhirsch A, et al. Treatment with trastuzumab for 1 year after adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer: a 4-year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2011;12(3):236–44.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Wong M, O’Neill S, Walsh G, Smith IE. Goserelin with chemotherapy to preserve ovarian function in pre-menopausal women with early breast cancer: menstruation and pregnancy outcomes. Ann Oncol. 2012;. doi:10.1093/annonc/mds250 (First published online: September 27).

    PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We wish to thank Mr. Naohito Fukui, the NPO Japan Clinical Research Support Unit staff and the Japanese Breast Cancer Society for their collaboration on this study and their ongoing development, maintenance and improvement of this registry. This work was supported by a research fund from the Japanese Breast Cancer Society.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Akemi Kataoka.

Additional information

Special Feature organized by Dr. Chikako Shimizu.

About this article

Cite this article

Kataoka, A., Tokunaga, E., Masuda, N. et al. Clinicopathological features of young patients (<35 years of age) with breast cancer in a Japanese Breast Cancer Society supported study. Breast Cancer 21, 643–650 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-013-0466-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-013-0466-2

Keywords

Navigation