Abstract
Maintaining indoor thermal comfort is crucial for the health and productivity of building occupants. Building envelope plays a major role in influencing the impact of outdoor climate and controlling the indoor thermal conditions. In this paper, comparative analysis of indoor comfortable temperature for four different types of building-integrated photovoltaic/thermal (BIPV/T) building models in a range of climate zones in Australia was conducted using TRNSYS simulation tool. In terms of system operational mode, the four types of BIPV/T building facade systems include a building-integrated photovoltaic single-skin facade (SSF), non-ventilated BIPV/T double-skin facade (BIPV/T-DSF), naturally ventilated BIPV/T-DSF and fan-assisted BIPV/T-DSF. In addition to the operational modes of the facade systems, two types of semi-transparent PV glazing with different visible light transmittance (VLT) were respectively applied to the models as external window glazing. The numerical results showed that the naturally ventilated BIPV/T-DSF with lower VLT (27%) PV glazing maintained a relatively better indoor temperature for the hot climatic conditions compared to the other operational modes, while the non-ventilated BIPV/T-DSF with higher VLT PV glazing (37.5%) offered more comfortable indoor temperature (i.e. 20 to 26 °C for office hours) for the cold climates in Australia. On the other hand, the naturally ventilated BIPV/T-DSF could basically maintain comfortable indoor temperatures from 22 to 27 °C during office hours without mechanical systems for the peak summer times for cool temperate climates in Australia. Moreover, it was found that the thermal insulation effect of semi-transparent PV glazing hardly affected indoor operative temperature in the ventilated modes of the BIPV/T-DSF. According to the sensitivity analysis, the change of U-value of internal window of the DSF would significantly lead to the change of indoor thermal comfort in both ventilated operational modes, but very few changes for the non-ventilated DSF. The variation of cavity depth had distinct impact on the indoor thermal comfort for fan-assisted DSF but slightly affected that of other modes. In addition, the changes of opening ratio for the ventilating louvers and fan airflow rate of the DSF also had a degree of influence on indoor thermal comfort for naturally ventilated DSF and fan-assisted DSF respectively.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aleksandrowicz O, Yezioro A (2018). Mechanically ventilated doubleskin facade in a hot and humid climate: Summer monitoring in an office tower in Tel Aviv. Architectural Science Review, 61: 171–188.
Architectural Louvers (2010). Model: E4WS Louver Performance Data. Architectural Louvers.
ASHRAE (2002). ASHRAE Guideline 14–2002 for Measurement of Energy and Demand Savings. Atlanta: American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, and Air Conditioning Engineers.
ASHRAE (2017). ASHRAE Standard 55-2017. Thermal Environmental Conditions for Human Occupancy. Atlanta: American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air Conditioning Engineers.
Australian Building Codes Board (2015). Climate Zone Map: Australia Wide. Available at https://www.abcb.gov.au/Resources/Tools-Calculators/Climate-Zone-Map-Australia-Wide Australian
Building Codes Board (2016). National Construction Code Volume 1: Building Code of Australia, Class 2 to Class 9 Buildings. Canberra: Australian Building Codes Board.
Aziiz AD, Wonorahardjo S, Koerniawan MD (2018). Effectiveness of Double Skin Facade in Controlling Indoor Air Temperature of Tropical Buildings. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 152: 012016. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/152/1/012016.
Barbosa S, Ip K (2016). Predicted thermal acceptance in naturally ventilated office buildings with double skin facades under Brazilian climates. Journal of Building Engineering, 7: 92–102.
Beckman WA, Broman L, Fiksel A, Klein SA, Lindberg E, Schuler M, Thornton J (1994). TRNSYS The most complete solar energy system modeling and simulation software. Renewable Energy, 5: 486–488.
Biyik E, Araz M, Hepbasli A, Shahrestani M, Yao R, et al. (2017). A key review of building integrated photovoltaic (BIPV) systems. Engineering Science and Technology, an International Journal, 20: 833–858.
Boyce P, Eklund N, Mangum S, Saalfield C, Tang L (1995). Minimum acceptable transmittance of glazing. Lighting Research and Technology, 27: 145–152.
Cannavale A, Hörantner M, Eperon GE, Snaith HJ, Fiorito F, Ayr U, Martellotta F (2017a). Building integration of semitransparent perovskite-based solar cells: Energy performance and visual comfort assessment. Applied Energy, 194: 94–107.
Cannavale A, Ierardi L, Hörantner M, Eperon GE, Snaith HJ, Ayr U, Martellotta F (2017b). Improving energy and visual performance in offices using building integrated perovskite-based solar cells: A case study in Southern Italy. Applied Energy, 205: 834–846.
Chan ALS, Chow TT, Fong KF, Lin Z (2009). Investigation on energy performance of double skin facade in Hong Kong. Energy and Buildings, 41: 1135–1142.
Chen C, Chen S, Chuang W, Shieh J (2011). Transparent glass window with energy-saving and heat insulation capabilities. Advanced Materials Research, 314: 10–16.
Christians JA, Schulz P, Tinkham JS, Schloemer TH, Harvey SP, et al. (2018). Tailored interfaces of unencapsulated perovskite solar cells for 1,000 hour operational stability. Nature Energy, 3: 68–74.
Diaz LM, Southall R (2015). Le Corbusier’s Cité de Refuge: Historical & technological performance of the air exacte. In: Proceedings of at the Le Corbusier: 50 years later, Valencia, Spain. http://dx.doi.org/10.4995/LC2015.2015.796
Ding W, Hasemi Y, Yamada T (2005). Natural ventilation performance of a double-skin facade with a solar chimney. Energy and Buildings, 37: 411–418.
Elarga H, Zarrella A, De Carli M (2016). Dynamic energy evaluation and glazing layers optimization of facade building with innovative integration of PV modules. Energy and Buildings, 111: 468–478.
Freire RZ, Oliveira GHC, Mendes N (2008). Predictive controllers for thermal comfort optimization and energy savings. Energy and Buildings, 40: 1353–1365.
Ghaffarianhoseini A, Ghaffarianhoseini A, Berardi U, Tookey J, Li DHW, Kariminia S (2016). Exploring the advantages and challenges of double-skin facades (DSFs). Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 60: 1052–1065.
Haase M, Wong F, Amato A (2007). Double–skin facades for Hong Kong. Surveying and Built Environment, 18(2): 17–32.
Han J, Lu L, Peng J, Yang H (2013). Performance of ventilated double-sided PV facade compared with conventional clear glass facade. Energy and Buildings, 56: 204–209.
Höppe P (2002). Different aspects of assessing indoor and outdoor thermal comfort. Energy and Buildings, 34: 661–665.
Hwang R-L, Shu S-Y (2011). Building envelope regulations on thermal comfort in glass facade buildings and energy-saving potential for PMV-based comfort control. Building and Environment, 46: 824–834.
Ioannidis Z, Buonomano A, Athienitis AK, Stathopoulos T (2017). Modeling of double skin facades integrating photovoltaic panels and automated roller shades: Analysis of the thermal and electrical performance. Energy and Buildings, 154: 618–632.
Joe J, Choi W, Kwon H, Huh J-H (2013). Load characteristics and operation strategies of building integrated with multi-story double skin facade. Energy and Buildings, 60: 185–198.
Kamel RS, Fung AS (2014). Modeling, simulation and feasibility analysis of residential BIPV/T+ASHP system in cold climate—Canada. Energy and Buildings, 82: 758–770.
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (2018). WINDOW: A computer program for calculating total window thermal performance indices. Available at https://windows.lbl.gov/software
Lyons PR, Arasteh D, Huizenga C (2000). Window performance for human thermal comfort. ASHRAE Transactions, 106(1): 594–602.
Mingotti N, Chenvidyakarn T, Woods AW (2011). The fluid mechanics of the natural ventilation of a narrow-cavity double-skin facade. Building and Environment, 46: 807–823.
Raftery P, Keane M, Costa A (2011). Calibrating whole building energy models: Detailed case study using hourly measured data. Energy and Buildings, 43: 3666–3679.
Peng J, Lu L, Yang H (2013). An experimental study of the thermal performance of a novel photovoltaic double-skin facade in Hong Kong. Solar Energy, 97: 293–304.
Peng J, Lu L, Yang H, Ma T (2015). Comparative study of the thermal and power performances of a semi-transparent photovoltaic facade under different ventilation modes. Applied Energy, 138: 572–583.
Peng J, Curcija DC, Lu L, Selkowitz SE, Yang H, Zhang W (2016). Numerical investigation of the energy saving potential of a semitransparent photovoltaic double-skin facade in a cool-summer Mediterranean climate. Applied Energy, 165: 345–356.
Raja IA, Nicol JF, McCartney KJ, Humphreys MA (2001). Thermal comfort: Use of controls in naturally ventilated buildings. Energy and Buildings, 33: 235–244.
Saadon S, Gaillard L, Giroux-Julien S, Ménézo C (2016). Simulation study of a naturally-ventilated building integrated photovoltaic/thermal (BIPV/T) envelope. Renewable Energy, 87: 517–531.
Saelens D, Hens H (2001). Experimental evaluation of airflow in naturally ventilated active envelopes. Journal of Thermal Envelope and Building Science, 25: 101–127.
Saelens D, Roels S, Hens H (2008). Strategies to improve the energy performance of multiple-skin facades. Building and Environment, 43: 638–650.
Viljoen A, Dubiel J, Wilson M, Fontoynont M (1997). Investigations for improving the daylighting potential of double-skinned office buildings. Solar Energy, 59: 179–194.
Wang C, Peng J, Li N, Wang M, Li X (2017). Study on the operation strategy of ventilated photovoltaic windows in hot-summer and cold-winter zone in China. Procedia Engineering, 205: 2092–2099.
Weber A, Koschenz M, Holst S, Hiller M, Welfonder T (2002). TRNFLOW: Integration of COMIS into TRNSYS TYPE 56. In: Proceedings of the 3rd European Conference on Energy Performance and Indoor Climate, EPIC 2002.
Yang S, Fiorito F, Sproul A, Prasad D (2017). Studies on optimal application of building integrated photovoltaic/thermal facade for commercial buildings in Australia. Paper presented at the Solar World Congress 2017, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
Yang S, Fiorito F, Sproul A, Prasad D (2018). Study of building integrated photovoltaic/thermal double-skin facade for commercial buildings in Sydney, Australia. Final Conference of COST TU1403 “Adaptive Facades Network”. Lucerne, Switzerland.
Zhang W, Eperon GE, Snaith HJ (2016). Metal halide perovskites for energy applications. Nature Energy, 1: 16048.
Zöllner A, Winter ERF, Viskanta R (2002). Experimental studies of combined heat transfer in turbulent mixed convection fluid flows in double skin facades. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 45: 4401–4408.
Acknowledgements
The authors kindly acknowledge the financial support for this research project was provided by the Faculty of Built Environment, University of New South Wales (Australia) and the Cooperative Research Centre for Low Carbon Living (CRC-LCL). The authors also would like to express the sincere gratitude to Dr. Jinqing Peng, from Hunan University (China) for providing the indispensable data.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yang, S., Cannavale, A., Prasad, D. et al. Numerical simulation study of BIPV/T double-skin facade for various climate zones in Australia: Effects on indoor thermal comfort. Build. Simul. 12, 51–67 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-018-0489-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-018-0489-x