Abstract
Rectourethral fistula (RUF) is a rare surgical condition, the management of which remains a surgical challenge as is evident by the numerous procedures described in the literature; none of them gaining widespread acceptance. We describe our experience in the management of RUF using gracilis muscle flap interposition. This study is a case series analysis of three patients with RUF treated at our center between 2016 and 2020. The information recorded was etiology, clinical presentation, prior surgeries, diagnostic workup, operative details, complications, and follow-up. One patient had RUF following pelvic fracture, one developed RUF following multiple blind metallic dilations, while the third patient developed RUF following ether installation to rupture Foley’s catheter balloon. All the patients had double diversion in the form of suprapubic cystostomy and colostomy prior to definitive surgical repair to 6 months later. The surgical technique used was excision of the fistula and repair of the rectal and urethral defects with interposition of the right gracilis muscle flap. The operative times were 320, 300, and 210 min, and the blood loss was 400, 300, and 250 ml. One patient had a surgical site infection and one had hematoma at the flap harvest site which were managed accordingly. The follow-up periods for the three patients were 23, 45, and 49 months. All the patients have been dry and continent. Gracilis muscle flap interposition is a safe and viable approach in the management of difficult to deal RUFs with good outcomes and an acceptable morbidity profile.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
Available with the authors.
Code Availability
Not applicable.
References
Crippa A, Dall’oglio MF, Nesrallah LJ, Hasegawa E, Antunes AA, Srougi M (2007) The York-Mason technique for recto-urethral fistulas. Clin Sao Paulo Braz 62(6):699–704
Culp OS, Calhoon HW (1964) A Variety of Rectourethral Fistulas: experiences with 20 cases. J Urol 91:560–571
Kua EHJ, Leo KW, Ong YS, Cheng C, Tan B-K (2013) Vascularisation of urethral repairs with the gracilis muscle flap. Arch Plast Surg 40(5):584–588
Chun L, Abbas MA (2011) Rectourethral fistula following laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Tech Coloproctol 15(3):297–300
Thomas C, Jones J, Jäger W, Hampel C, Thüroff JW, Gillitzer R (2010) Incidence, clinical symptoms and management of rectourethral fistulas after radical prostatectomy. J Urol 183(2):608–612
Hanna JM, Turley R, Castleberry A, Hopkins T, Peterson AC, Mantyh C et al (2014) Surgical management of complex rectourethral fistulas in irradiated and nonirradiated patients. Dis Colon Rectum 57(9):1105–1112
Rouanne M, Vaessen C, Bitker M-O, Chartier-Kastler E, Rouprêt M (2011) Outcome of a modified York Mason technique in men with iatrogenic urethrorectal fistula after radical prostatectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 54(8):1008–1013
Gupta G, Kumar S, Kekre NS, Gopalakrishnan G (2008) Surgical management of rectourethral fistula. Urology 71(2):267–271
Meland NB, Arnold PG, Weiss HC (1991) Management of the recalcitrant total-hip arthroplasty wound. Plast Reconstr Surg 88(4):681–685
Asaadi M, Murray KA, Russell RC, Zook EG (1986) Experimental evaluation of free-tissue transfer to promote healing of infected wounds in dogs. Ann Plast Surg 17(1):6–12
Zmora O, Tulchinsky H, Gur E, Goldman G, Klausner JM, Rabau M (2006) Gracilis muscle transposition for fistulas between the rectum and urethra or vagina. Dis Colon Rectum 49(9):1316–1321
Lee YT, Lee JM (1990) Gracilis myocutaneous flap for the coverage of an extensive scrotoperineal defect and protection of the ruptured urethra and testes. Yonsei Med J 31(2):187–191
Ryan JA, Beebe HG, Gibbons RP (1979) Gracilis muscle flap for closure of rectourethral fistula. J Urol 122(1):124–125
Nyam DC, Pemberton JH (1999) Management of iatrogenic rectourethral fistula. Dis Colon Rectum 42(8):994–7 (discussion 997-999)
Wexner SD, Ruiz DE, Genua J, Nogueras JJ, Weiss EG, Zmora O (2008) Gracilis muscle interposition for the treatment of rectourethral, rectovaginal, and pouch-vaginal fistulas: results in 53 patients. Ann Surg 248(1):39–43
Rius J, Nessim A, Nogueras JJ, Wexner SD (2000) Gracilis transposition in complicated perianal fistula and unhealed perineal wounds in Crohn’s disease. Eur J Surg 166(3):218–22
Zmora O, Potenti FM, Wexner SD, Pikarsky AJ, Efron JE, Nogueras JJ et al (2003) Gracilis muscle transposition for iatrogenic rectourethral fistula. Ann Surg 237(4):483–487
Rabau M, Zmora O, Tulchinsky H, Gur E, Goldman G (2006) Recto-vaginal/urethral fistula: repair with gracilis muscle transposition. Acta Chir Iugosl 53(2):81–84
Ulrich D, Roos J, Jakse G, Pallua N (2009) Gracilis muscle interposition for the treatment of recto-urethral and rectovaginal fistulas: a retrospective analysis of 35 cases. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 62(3):352–356
Samplaski MK, Wood HM, Lane BR, Remzi FH, Lucas A, Angermeier KW (2011) Functional and quality-of-life outcomes in patients undergoing transperineal repair with gracilis muscle interposition for complex rectourethral fistula. Urology 77(3):736–741
Prabha V, Kadeli V (2018) Repair of recto-urethral fistula with urethral augmentation by buccal mucosal graft and gracilis muscle flap interposition - our experience. Cent European J Urol 71(1):121–128
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics Approval
Not applicable.
Consent to Participate
Consent has been taken from all the patients.
Consent for Publication
Consent for publication has been taken from all the authors.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Singh, P., Kumar, S., Panaiyadiyan, S. et al. Repair of Rectourethral Fistula Using Gracilis Muscle Flap Interposition—a Tertiary Care Center Experience. Indian J Surg 84, 833–838 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-021-03078-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-021-03078-5