Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A Randomised Prospective Study to Evaluate Preperitoneal Mesh Repair Versus Onlay Mesh Repair and Laparoscopic IPOM in Incisional Hernia Surgery

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Incisional hernia remains a very common postoperative complication. These are encountered with an incidence of up to 20 % following laparotomy. These hernias enlarge over time, making the repair difficult, and serious complications like bowel obstruction, strangulation and enterocutaneous fistula can occur. Hence, elective repair is indicated to avoid these complications. Implantation of a prosthetic mesh is nowadays considered as the standard treatment due to low hernia recurrence. The most common mesh repair techniques used are the onlay repair, sublay repair and laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM). However, it is still not clear which technique among the three is superior. A study consisting of 30 patients who underwent incisional hernia repair by onlay, laparoscopic and preperitoneal mesh repair with abdominoplasty was conducted in the Coimbatore Medical College and Hospital. Of the three groups, the preperitoneal repair with abdominoplasty was found to have better patient compliance and satisfaction with regard to occurrence of complications and appearance of the abdominal wall without laxity in a single sitting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mudge M, Hughes LE (1985) Incisional hernia: a 10 year prospective study of incidence and attitudes. Br J Surg 72:70–71. doi:10.1002/bjs.1800720127

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Read RC, Yoder G (1989) Recent trends in the management of incisional herniation. Arch Surg 124:485–488. doi:10.1001/archsurg.1989.01410040095022

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Den Hartog D, Dur AH, Tuinebreijer WE, et al (2008) Open surgical procedures for incisional hernias. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (3):CD006438

  4. de Vries Reilingh TS, van Geldere D, Langenhorst B, de Jong D et al (2004) Repair of large midline incisional hernias with polypropylene mesh comparison of three operative techniques. Hernia 8(1):56–59

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kurzer M, Kark A, Selouk S, Belsham P et al (2008) Open mesh repair of incisional hernia using a sublay technique: long-term follow-up. World J Surg 32(1):31–36

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 'Wéber G, Baracs J, Horváth OP, et al. Onlay mesh provides significantly better results than sublay reconstruction. Prospective randomized multicenter study of abdominal wall reconstruction with sutures only, or with surgical mesh—results of a five-year follow-up

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Natarajan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Natarajan, S., Meenaa, S. & Thimmaiah, K.A. A Randomised Prospective Study to Evaluate Preperitoneal Mesh Repair Versus Onlay Mesh Repair and Laparoscopic IPOM in Incisional Hernia Surgery. Indian J Surg 79, 96–100 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-015-1430-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-015-1430-5

Keywords