Abstract
Negative appendectomy remains a concern in current surgical practice. Data from the developing world is scarce. Data of appendectomies during the last 5 years were analyzed. Interval and incidental appendectomies were excluded. The demographic details, presenting complaints, clinical signs, and investigations performed were recorded in a predesigned proforma. The data were critically analyzed. Six hundred eighty-five appendectomies were performed during the period. One hundred eighty-five patients with a normal appendix were identified on histopathology. Sixty-seven patients with incidental or interval appendectomies were excluded. Thus, 118 patients had appendectomies performed erroneously. All these patients with presumed diagnosis of acute appendicitis were operated on by resident surgeons. Records of 17 patients could not be retrieved. The most common symptom was abdominal pain (100 %), and the commonest sign was right iliac fossa tenderness (93 %). Most of the patients underwent USG to supplement the diagnosis. CT scan and diagnostic laparoscopy were not performed. The negative appendectomy rate was 17.2 % (12.4 % in males; 33.3 % in females). The highest incidence of negative appendectomy was in females aged 11–20 years (66.7 %). The rate of negative appendectomy at our institute is comparable with the world statistics. More diligence is required in making the clinical diagnosis of acute appendicitis, especially in young females. The use of C-reactive protein and CT scan may decrease the negative appendectomy rate.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Rosen MP, Ding A, Blake ME, Cash BD, Fidler JL, Grant TH et al (2011) ACR Appropriateness Criteria® right lower quadrant pain—suspected appendicitis. J Am Coll Radiol 8:749–755
Ma KW, Chia NH, Yeung HW, Cheung MT (2010) If not appendicitis, then what else can it be? A retrospective review of 1492 appendectomies. Hong Kong Med J 16:12–17
Grönroos JM (2011) Clinical suspicion of acute appendicitis—is the time ripe for more conservative treatment? Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 20:42–45
Cavuşoğlu YH, Erdoğan D, Karaman A, Aslan MK, Karaman I, Tütün OC (2009) Do not rush into operating and just observe actively if you are not sure about the diagnosis of appendicitis. Pediatr Surg Int 25:277–282
Coursey CA, Nelson RC, Patel MB, Cochran C, Dodd LG, Delong DM et al (2010) Making the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: do more preoperative CT scans mean fewer negative appendectomies? A 10-year study. Radiology 254:460–468
Morse BC, Roettger RH, Kalbaugh CA, Blackhurst DW, Hines WB Jr (2007) Abdominal CT scanning in reproductive-age women with right lower quadrant pain: does its use reduce negative appendectomy rates and healthcare costs? Am Surg 73:580–584
Flum DR, Koepsell T (2002) The clinical and economic correlates of misdiagnosed appendicitis: nationwide analysis. Arch Surg 137:799–804
Bijnen CL, van den Broek WT, Bijnen AB, de Ruiter P, Gouma DJ (2003) Implications of removing a normal appendix. Dig Surg 20(215–9):220–221
Howell JM, Eddy OL, Lukens TW, Thiessen ME, Weingart SD, Decker WW (2010) Clinical policy: critical issues in the evaluation and management of emergency department patients with suspected appendicitis. Ann Emerg Med 55:71–116
Ebell MH (2008) Diagnosis of appendicitis: part 1. History and physical examination. Am Fam Physician 77:828–830
Williams NS, Bulstrode CJK, O’Connell PR editors (2008) Bailey & Love’s short practice of surgery. 25th Edition. International Students Edition. Hodder Arnold, pp 1209–11
Cole MA, Maldonado N (2011) Evidence-based management of suspected appendicitis in the emergency department. Emerg Med Pract 13:1–29
Laméris W, van Randen A, Go PM, Bouma WH, Donkervoort SC, Bossuyt PM, Stoker J, Boermeester MA (2009) Single and combined diagnostic value of clinical features and laboratory tests in acute appendicitis. Acad Emerg Med 16:835–842
Mirza MR, Habib L, Jaleel F (2009) Factors identified for negative appendicectomies. Mymensingh Med J 18:198–202
Mohebbi HA, Panahi F, Kabir A (2006) Comparing presentation and diagnostic accuracy for conscripts and nonconscripts who have already been selected for appendectomy. Mil Med 171:1110–1112
Chooi WK, Brown JA, Zetler P, Wiseman S, Cooperberg P (2007) Imaging of acute appendicitis and its impact on negative appendectomy and perforation rates: the St. Paul’s experience. Can Assoc Radiol J 58:220–224
Chamisa I (2009) A clinicopathological review of 324 appendices removed for acute appendicitis in Durban, South Africa: a retrospective analysis. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 91:688–692
Das MK, Gautam D, Roy H, Mukherjee A, Gaurav R, Sen S (2009) Unnecessary appendicectomy in suspected cases of acute appendicitis. J Indian Med Assoc 107:354–357
Merlin MA, Shah CN, Shiroff AM (2010) Evidence-based appendicitis: the initial work-up. Postgrad Med 122:189–195
John SK, Joseph J, Shetty SR (2011) Avoiding negative appendectomies in rural surgical practice: is C-reactive protein estimation useful as a diagnostic tool? Natl Med J India 24:144–147
Zimmermann PG (2008) Is it appendicitis? Am J Nurs 108:27–31
Khairy G (2009) Acute appendicitis: is removal of a normal appendix still existing and can we reduce its rate? Saudi J Gastroenterol 15:167–170
Piper HG, Rusnak C, Orrom W, Hayashi A, Cunningham J (2008) Current management of appendicitis at a community center—how can we improve? Am J Surg 195:585–588
Cuschieri J, Florence M, Flum DR, Jurkovich GJ, Lin P, Steele SR et al (2008) Negative appendectomy and imaging accuracy in the Washington State Surgical Care and Outcomes Assessment Program. The SCOAP Collaborative. Ann Surg 248:557–563
Chiang DT, Tan EI, Bricks D (2008) ‘To have or not to have’. Should computed tomography and ultrasonography be implemented as a routine work-up for patients with suspected acute appendicitis in a regional hospital? Ann R Coll Surg Engl 90:17–21
Pooler BD, Lawrence EM, Pickhardt PJ (2012) MDCT for suspected appendicitis in the elderly: diagnostic performance and patient outcome. Emerg Radiol 19:27–33
Binnebösel M, Otto J, Stumpf M, Mahnken AH, Gassler N, Schumpelick V et al (2009) Acute appendicitis. Modern diagnostics—surgical ultrasound. Chirurg 80:579–587
Graat LJ, Bosma E, Roukema JA, Heisterkamp J (2012) Appendectomy by residents is safe and not associated with a higher incidence of complications: a retrospective cohort study. Ann Surg 255:715–719
Kazaure HS, Roman SA, Sosa JA (2012) The resident as surgeon: an analysis of ACS-NSQIP. J Surg Res 178:126–132
Phillips AW, Jones AE, Sargen K (2009) Should the macroscopically normal appendix be removed during laparoscopy for acute right iliac fossa pain when no other explanatory pathology is found? Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 19:392–394
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Joshi, M.K., Joshi, R., Alam, S.E. et al. Negative Appendectomy: an Audit of Resident-Performed Surgery. How Can Its Incidence Be Minimized?. Indian J Surg 77 (Suppl 3), 913–917 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-014-1063-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-014-1063-0