Skip to main content
Log in

Silk grafting with chitosan and crosslinking agents

  • Published:
Fibers and Polymers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Chitosan grafting onto silk was tested with three crosslinking agents: trifunctional epoxy resin Araldite DY-T, PEG400 dimethacrylate, and glutaraldehyde in acetic as well as in tartaric acid solutions. Operating conditions were studied to obtain a significant silk weighting with satisfactory graft yields. With the epoxy crosslinker the weight gain was in the range from 1.8 to 8.8 % with graft yield from 8 to 23 %. In the case of PEG400DMA weight gain was 8–12 % with 22–24 % graft yield. With glutaraldehyde in tartaric acid solution a maximum weight gain of 8.4 % with 27.6 % graft yield was obtained. Results of determination of primary amino groups on the grafted silk showed that with epoxy and glutaraldehyde, unlike PEG400DMA, the amino groups of chitosan were only partially involved in crosslinking. Results of DSC analyses suggested that the modification of fibroin structure in chitosan-grafted silk was stronger with glutaraldehyde than with epoxy or dimethacrylate. FTIR-ATR spectra of grafted fibers were found very similar to that of control silk with an additional weak peak ascribable to chitosan in 1180–1080 cm−1 range. Surface investigation through AFM showed clear morphology differences between chitosan-grafted silk with epoxy or dimethacrylate and that crosslinked with glutaraldehyde; the latter appears uneven and scale-like, the others slightly rougher than the original silk.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J. Berger, M. Reist, J. M. Mayer, O. Felt, N. A. Peppas, and R. Gurny, Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm., 57, 19 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. C. W. Lou, Fiber. Polym., 9, 286 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. H. T. Chiu, R. L. Chen, P. Y. Wu, T. Y. Chiang, and S. C. Chen, Polym. Plast. Technol. Eng., 46, 1121 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. E. Pascual and M. R. Julià, J. Biotechnol., 89, 289 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. N. Onar and M. Sarnšık, Fibres Text. East. Eur., 13, 54 (2005).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. D. Jocic, S. Vílchez, T. Topalovic, A. Navarro, P. Jovancic, M. R. Julià, and P. Erra, Carbohydr. Polym., 60, 51 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. R. D. Mehta and R. Combs, Am. Dyest. Rep., 86, 43 (1997).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. G. A. F. Roberts and F. A. Wood, J. Biotechnol., 89, 297 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. M. R. Julià, M. Cot, P. Erra, D. Jocic, and J. M. Canal, Text. Chem. Color., 30, 78 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  10. C. Tonin, R. Innocenti, G. Roncolato, and F. Ferrero, J. Natural Fibers, 4, 77 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Z. Zhang, L. Chen, J. Ji, Y. Huang, and D. Chen, Text. Res. J., 73, 1103 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Y. B. Chang, P. C. Tu, M.W. Wu, T. H. Hsueh, and S. H. Hsu, Fiber. Polym., 9, 307 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. G. C. East and Y. Quin, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 50, 1773 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. S. Hirano, T. Nakahira, M. Nakagawa, and S. K. Kim, J. Biotechnol., 70, 373 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. S. S. Kim, Y. M. Lee, and C. S. Cho, Polymer, 36, 4497 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. J. Z. Knaul, S. M. Hudson, and K. A. M. Creber, J. Polym. Sci. Pol. Phys., 37, 2079 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. R. Rujiravanit, S. Kruaykitanon, A. M. Jamieson, and S. Tokura, Macromol. Biosci., 3, 604 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. O. A. C. Monteiro and C. Airoldi, Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 26, 119 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. F. Ferrero, M. Periolatto, and M. Luraschi, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 103, 4039 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. F. Ferrero, M. Periolatto, and M. Bianchetto Songia, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 110, 1019 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. S. Sampaio, P. Taddei, P. Monti, J. Buchert, and G. Freddi, J. Biotechnol., 116, 21 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. G. D. Kang, K. H. Lee, C. S. Ki, and Y. H. Park, Fiber. Polym., 5, 234 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. G. Freddi, A. Anghileri, S. Sampaio, J. Buchert, P. Monti, and P. Taddei, J. Biotechnol., 125, 281 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. S. Davarpanah, N. M. Mahmoodi, M. Arami, H. Bahrami, and F. Mazaheri, Appl. Surf. Sci., 255, 4171 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. J. Vartiainen, M. Rättö Hurme, Polym. Bull., 54, 343 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. V. G. Janolino and H. E. Swaisgood, Appl. Biochem. Biotech., 36, 81 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. S. J. Park, K. Y. Lee, W. S. Ha, and S. Y. Park, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 74, 2571 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Y. L. Guan, L. Shao, and K. D. Yao, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 61, 2325 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. C. Peniche, C. Elvira, and J. S. Roman, Polymer, 39, 6549 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Franco Ferrero.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ferrero, F., Periolatto, M., Burelli, S. et al. Silk grafting with chitosan and crosslinking agents. Fibers Polym 11, 185–192 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-010-0185-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-010-0185-7

Keywords

Navigation