Skip to main content
Log in

Multi-orientation optimization of complex parts based on model segmentation in additive manufacturing

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Build orientation has a significant impact on the surface quality, support structure, and final cost of the fabricated model. In this study, we focus our attention on the surface quality and printing cost of complex parts when fabricated under multiple build orientations. A novel method using model segmentation is proposed to search for an optimal build orientation for each sub-model decomposed by Reeb graph. The sub-model is divided into separate regions that are treated differently based on modified curvature shift strategy. Every flat facet of the regions is given a different weight factor to build the volume error function. The optimal build orientation for each sub-model is the one leading to the minimal error of the volume error function. The case study demonstrates that the proposed method obtains a smaller error without any support structure. The model surface in higher weighted regions obtains a higher surface quality and is more cost saving when printed, especially for complex models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

AM :

Addictive manufacturing

S :

The hash matrix

c max :

The maximum curvature

Cs v :

Curvature shift vector

V i :

The shift vector

p i :

The ith point

c p :

The curvature of pi

c m :

The mean curvature

k x :

The kernel function

c av :

The average curvature

c f :

The curvature of one face

w c :

The cluster weight

w(c) :

The curvature weight

w(d) :

The gaussian distance weight

w cl :

The local weight

w f :

The facet weight

ΔV :

The volume error of one face

V :

The whole volume error of the model

c cusp :

The cusp height

θ i :

The angle between facet normal and Z-axis

\({\vec n}\) :

The facet normal

\({\vec d}\) :

The build orientation

L P :

The projection length of all facet normals

K i :

The projection length of the normal vector

References

  1. H. Yi et al., Direct fabrication of metal tubes with high-quality inner surfaces via droplet deposition over soluble cores, J. Ma- ter. Process. Technol., 264 (2019) 145–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. H. Guo et al., Build orientation optimization based on weighted analysis of local surface region curvature, Appl. Sci., 11(1) (2021) 304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. J. Jiang et al., Investigation of printable threshold overhang angle in extrusion-based additive manufacturing for reducing support waste, Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf., 31(10) (2018) 961–969.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Y. Zhang et al., Build orientation optimization for multi-part production in additive manufacturing, J. Intell. Manuf., 28(6) (2017) 1393–1407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Y. Zhang et al., Feature based building orientation optimization for additive manufacturing, Rapid Prototyp. J., 22 (2) (2016).

  6. D. Zhao and W. Guo, Shape and performance controlled advanced design for additive manufacturing: a review of slicing and path planning, J. Manuf. Sci. Eng., 142(1) (2020) 010801.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. D. Ding et al., Automatic multi-direction slicing algorithms for wire based additive manufacturing, Robot. Comput.-Integr. Manuf., 37(C) (2016) 139–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. X. Wei et al., Toward support-free 3D printing: a skeletal approach for partitioning models, IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph., 24(10) (2018) 2799–2812.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. O. K.-C. Au et al., Skeleton extraction by mesh contraction, ACM Trans. Graph., 27(3) (2008) 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. C. Wu et al., RoboFDM: A robotic system for support-free fabrication using FDM, 2017 IEEE Int. Conf. Robot. Autom. ICRA (2017) 1175–1180.

  11. Y. Murtezaoglu et al., Geometry-based process planning for multi-axis support-free additive manufacturing, Procedia CIRP, 78 (2018) 73–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. C. Dai et al., Support-free volume printing by multi-axis motion, ACM Trans. Graph., 37(4) (2018) 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. C. Wu et al., General support-effective decomposition for multi-directional 3-D printing, IEEE Trans. Autom. Sci. Eng., 17(2) (2020) 599–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Y. Gao et al., Near support-free multi-directional 3D printing via global-optimal decomposition, Graph. Models, 104 (2019) 101034.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. E. Karasik, R. Fattal and M. Werman, Object partitioning for support-free 3D-printing, Comput. Graph. Forum, 38(2) (2019) 305–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. X. Wang et al., A skeleton-based process planning framework for support-free 3+2-axis printing of multi-branch freeform parts, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 110(1–2) (2020) 327–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. H. Liu et al., An approach to partition workpiece CAD model towards 5-axis support-free 3D printing, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 106(1–2) (2020) 683–699.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. C. Wu, Y.-J. Liu and C. C. L. Wang, Learning to accelerate decomposition for multi-directional 3D printing, arXiv:2004.034 50v3 (2020).

  19. Y. Li et al., Multi-axis support-free printing of freeform parts with lattice infill structures, Comput.-Aided Des., 133 (2021) 102986.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. I. Filoscia et al., Optimizing object decomposition to reduce visual artifacts in 3D printing, Comput. Graph. Forum, 39(2) (2020) 423–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Q. Hu et al., Oriented to multi-branched structure unsupported 3D printing method research, Materials, 13(9) (2020) 2023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. X. Xiao and S. Joshi, Decomposition and sequencing for a 5-axis hybrid manufacturing process, Proceedings of the ASME 2020 15th International Manufacturing Science and Engineering Conference. Volume 1: Additive Manufacturing; Advanced Materials Manufacturing; Biomanufacturing; Life Cycle Engineering; Manufacturing Equipment and Automation, September 3 (2020).

  23. X. Qu and B. Stucker, A 3D surface offset method for STL-format models, Rapid Prototyp. J., 9(3) (2003) 133–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. C. Wang and X. Qian, Simultaneous optimization of build orientation and topology for additive manufacturing, Addit. Manuf., 34 (2020) 101246.

    Google Scholar 

  25. J. Tierny, J.-P. Vandeborre and M. Daoudi, Invariant high level reeb graphs of 3D polygonal meshes, Third Int. Symp. 3D Data Process. Vis. Transm. 3DPVT06, IEEE, Chapel Hill, NC, USA (2006) 105–112.

    Google Scholar 

  26. S. Biasotti et al., Reeb graphs for shape analysis and applications, Theor. Comput. Sci., 392(1–3) (2008) 5–22.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. P. Das et al., Selection of build orientation for optimal support structures and minimum part errors in additive manufacturing, Comput.-Aided Des. Appl., 14 (2017) 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. N. Luo and Q. Wang, Fast slicing orientation determining and optimizing algorithm for least volumetric error in rapid prototyping, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 83(5–8) (2016) 1297–1313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. B. Ezair, F. Massarwi and G. Elber, Orientation analysis of 3D objects toward minimal support volume in 3D-printing, Comput. Graph., 51 (2015) 117–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51935009; 51821093), Zhejiang Key Research and Development Project (LGG20E050006; LGG21 E050020), Zhejiang University president special fund financed by Zhejiang province (2021XZZX008).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jinghua Xu.

Additional information

Hongshuai Guo is currently a Ph.D. student in the School of Mechanical Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China. His research interests include computational geometry, computer graphics, 3D printing, topology analysis, etc.

Jianghua Xu is currently an Associate Professor in the School of Mechanical Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China. His research interests include computer graphics, 3D printing, machine computer vision, digital prototyping, etc.

Shuyou Zhang is currently a Professor in the School of Mechanical Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China. His research interests include product digital design, intelligent design and simulation analysis of complex equipment, computer graphics, etc.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Guo, H., Xu, J., Zhang, S. et al. Multi-orientation optimization of complex parts based on model segmentation in additive manufacturing. J Mech Sci Technol 37, 317–331 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-022-1231-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-022-1231-2

Keywords

Navigation