Skip to main content
Log in

Simulation-optimization model for non-point source pollution management in watersheds: Application of cooperative game theory

  • Environmental Engineering
  • Published:
KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A new cooperative watershed management methodology is designed for developing an equitable and efficient Best Management Practice cost allocation among landowners in a watershed. The approach intends to control the total sediment yield in the watershed, considering landowners’ conflicting interests. Wet detention ponds, are considered as the only available options to the landowners. The quality of the storm water is evaluated by the Total Suspended Solid loading from the watersheds. The proposed methodology combines a watershed simulation model, named Soil Water Accounting Tool (SWAT), with an Ant Colony Optimization (ACO) module and the cooperative game theory approach. Integration of SWAT and ACO modules provide the best set of designs for any constraints on target sediment removal set forth by non-cooperative and cooperative behaviors of the stakeholders to participate in the coalition to minimize the total cost of management practice. Nash Bargaining Theory is used to investigate how the maximum saving on cost of the participating players in a coalition can be fairly allocated. The proposed method is illustrated by a hypothetical example. The results demonstrate the applicability of the methodology. For the hypothetical case example, the proposed methodology with grand coalition leads to approximately 48 percent cost saving.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbaspour, K. C., Genuchten, M. Th. V., Schulin, R., and Schlappi, E. (1997). “A sequential uncertainty domain inverse procedure for estimating subsurface flow and transport parameters.” Water Resour. Res., Vol. 33, No. 8, pp. 1879–1892.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adams, G., Gordon, R., and Leo, S. (1996). “Modeling multilateral negotiations: An application to california water policy.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, Vol. 30, No. 1 pp. 97–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Afshar, M. H. and Marino, M. A. (2006). “Application of an ant algorithm for layout optimization of tree networks.” Engineering Optimization, Vol. 38, No. 3, pp. 353–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, J. G., Srinisvan, R., Muttiah, R. S., and Williams, J. R. (1998). “Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment, Part I: Model development.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., Vol. 34, No. 1, pp. 73–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Axelrad, G. and Feinerman, E. (2008). “Regional planning of wastewater reuse for irrigation and river rehabilitation.” Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 60, No. 1, pp. 105–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, C. T., Ou, C. P., and Chau, K. W. (2002). “Combining a fuzzy optimal model with a genetic algorithm to solve multiobjective rainfall-runoff model calibration.” Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 268, Nos. 1–4, pp. 72–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dinar, A. and Howitt, R. E. (1997). “Mechanisms for allocation of environmental control cost: Empirical tests of acceptability and stability.” Journal of Environmental Management., Vol. 49, No. 2, pp. 183–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dinar, A., McCaffery, S., Dinar, S., and McKinney, D. (2007). Bridges over water: Understanding transboundary water conflict, cooperation and negotiation, World Scientific Publishing Company, Hackensack, NJ, USA.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chau, K. W. (2006). “Particle swarm optimization training algorithm for anns in stage prediction of shing mun river.” Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 329, Nos. 3–4, pp. 363–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorigo, M., Maniezzo, V., and Colorni, A. (1996). “The ant system: Optimization by a colony of cooperating ants.” IEEE Trans. Sys. Man Cybern., Vol. 26, No. 1, pp. 29–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, C. H., Welty, C., and Traver, R. G. (2005). “Watershed-scale evaluation of a system of storm water detention basins.” J. Hydrol. Eng., Vol. 10, No. 3, pp. 237–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez, L. (2005). “Coastal watershed management across an international border in the tijuana river watershed.” Water Resources Research., Vol. 41, No. W05003, 9, pp. 31–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guo, C. Y. (1999). “Detention basin sizing for small urban catchments.” ASCE J. of Water Resources Planning and Management, Vol. 125, No. 6, pp. 380–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrell, L. J. and Ranjithan, S. R. (2003). “Detention pond design and land use planning for watershed management.” J. Water Resour. Plan. Mgmt., Vol. 129, No. 2, pp. 98–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jalali, M. R., Afshar, A., and Marino, M. A. (2006a). “Improved ant colony optimization algorithm for reservoir operation.” Scientica Iranica., Vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 295–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jalali, M. R., Afshar, A., and Marino, M. A. (2006b). “Reservoir operation by ant colony optimization algorithms.” Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transaction B, Engineering., Vol. 30, No. B1, pp. 107–117.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Jalali, M. R., Afshar, A., and Marino, M. A. (2007). “Multi-colony ant algorithm for continuous multi-reservoir operation optimization problems.” Water Resource Management., Vol. 21, No. 9, pp. 1429–1447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kucukmehmetoglu, M. (2012). “An integrative case study approach between game theory and Pareto frontier concepts for the transboundary water resources allocations.” Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 450–451, No. 11, pp. 308–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, C. (2012). “Multi-objective game-theory models for conflict analysis in reservoir watershed management.” J. Chemosphere, Vol. 87, No. 6, pp. 608–613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lejano, R. P. and Davos, C. A. (1995). “Cost allocation of multiagency water resource projects: Game theoretic approaches and case study.” Water Resources Research., Vol. 31, No. 5, pp. 1387–1393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madadgar, S. and Afshar, A. (2009). “An improved continuous ant algorithm for optimization of water resources problems.” Water Resource Management, Vol. 23, No. 10, pp. 2119–2139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madani, K. (2010). “Game theory and water resources.” Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 381, Nos. 3–4, pp. 225–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madani, K. (2012). “Hydropower licensing and climate change: Insights from cooperative game theory.” Advances in Water Resources, Vol. 34, No. 2, pp. 174–183.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Mahjouri, N. and Ardestani, M. (2009). “A game theoretic approach for inter-basin water resources allocation considering the water quality issues.” Environ. Monit. Assess., Vol. 167, Nos. 1–4, pp. 527–544.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mallin, M. A., Ensign, S. H., Wheeler, T. L., and Mayes, D. B. (2002). “Pollutant removal efficacy of three wet detention ponds.” J. Environ. Qual., Vol. 31, No. 2, pp. 654–660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nash, J. F. (1950). “The bargaining problem.” Econometrica, Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 155–62.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Niksokhan, M. H., Kerachian, R., and Karamouz, M. (2009). “A game theoretic approach for trading discharge permits in rivers.” Water Sci. Technol., Vol. 60, No. 3, pp. 793–804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neitsch, S. L., Arnold, J. G., Kiniry, J. R., Williams, J. R., and King, K. W. (2002). Soil and water assessment tool: Theoretical documentation, Blackland Research Center, Texas Agricultural Experiment Station.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfaff, A. and Vélez, N, A. (2012). “Efficiency and equity in negotiated resource transfers: Contributions and limitations of trust with limited contracts.” Ecological Economics, Vol. 74, pp. 55–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rostamian, R., Jaleh, A., Afyuni, M., Mousavi, S. F., Heidarpour, M., Jalalian, A. and Abbaspour, K. C. (2008). “Application of a SWAT model for estimating runoff and sediment in two mountainous basins in central Iran.” Hydrological Sciences-Journal-des Sciences Hydrologiques, Vol. 53, No. 5, pp. 977–988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, A. R., Maier, H. R., Foong, W. K., Phang, K. Y., Seah, H. Y., and Tan, C. H. (2001). “Selection of parameters for ant colony optimization applied to the optimal design of water distribution system.” Proc., Int. Congress on Modeling and Simulation, Canberra, Australia, pp. 1931–1936.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straffin, P. (1993). Game theory and strategy, Mathematical Association of America, Washington, USA.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Supalla, R., Klaus, B., Yeboah, O., and Bruins, R. (2002). “A game theory approach to deciding who will supply instream flow water.” Journal of the American Water Resources Association, Vol. 38, No. 4, pp. 959–966.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tao, Y. and Wang, Y. (2009). “Game analysis of cooperative pollution control of river basin.” Presented at: 2009 International Conference on Business Intelligence and Financial Engineering, Beijing, China July 24–26, 2009, pp. 695–698.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teasley, R. L. and McKinney, D. C. (2011). “Calculating the benefits of transboundary river basin cooperation: The syr darya basin.” J. Water Resour. Planning and Management, Vol. 137, No. 6, pp. 481–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tolson, B. A. and Shoemaker, C. A. (2004). “Watershed modeling of the Cannonsville basin using SWAT2000: Model development, calibration and validation for the prediction of flow, sediment and phosphorus transport to the Cannonsville reservoir.” Technical Report, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Cornell Univ., Ithaca, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Environmental Protection Agency (US-EPA) (1999). Storm water technology fact sheet, Wet Detention Ponds, Office of Water Washington, D.C., EPA 832-F-99-048. <http://www.google.com/url?q=http://water.epa.gov/scitech/wastetech/upload/2002_06_28_mtb_wetdtnpn.pdf&sa=U&ei=1sxEUNzgK8emhAe80oHoBg&ved=0CBIQFjAA&usg=AFQjCNEtlrpz5AkDn3DhAoQfy2smDJFOK g> (Oct. 29, 2012).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y. (2011). “Trading water along a river.” J. Mathematical Social Sciences, Vol. 61, No. 2, pp. 124–130.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, G., Chen, S., Barber, M. E., and Yonge, D. R. (2004). “Modeling flow and pollutant removal of wet detention pond treating stormwater runoff.” Journal of Environmental Engineering, Vol. 130, No. 11, pp. 1315–1321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, L., Fang, L., and Hipel, K. W. (2007). “Mathematical programming approaches for modeling water rights allocation.” J. Water Resour. Plan Manage., Vol. 133, No. 1, pp. 50–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, L., Fang, L., and Hipel, K. W. (2008). “Basin-wide cooperative water resources allocation.” Eur. J. Oper. Res., Elsevier., Vol. 190, No. 3, pp. 798–817.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wei, S., Yang, H., Abbaspour, K., Mousavi, J., and Gnuack, A. (2010). “Game theory based models to analyze water conflicts in the Middle route of the South-to-North water transfer project in china.” Water Research, Vol. 44, No. 8, pp. 2499–2516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. R. and Berndt, H. D. (1977). “Sediment yield prediction based on watershed hydrology.” Trans. Am. Soc. Agric. Engrs., Vol. 20, No. 6, pp. 1100–1104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xie, J. X., Cheng, C. T., Chau, K. W., and Pei, Y. Z. (2006). “A hybrid adaptive time-delay neural network model for multi-step-ahead prediction of sunspot activity.” International Journal of Environment and Pollution, Vol. 28, Nos. 3–4, pp. 364–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammad J. Emami Skardi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Skardi, M.J.E., Afshar, A. & Solis, S.S. Simulation-optimization model for non-point source pollution management in watersheds: Application of cooperative game theory. KSCE J Civ Eng 17, 1232–1240 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-013-0077-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-013-0077-7

Keywords

Navigation