Skip to main content
Log in

The clientele effect around the turn of the year: evidence from the bond markets

  • Published:
Journal of Economics and Finance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Studying the returns of US Treasury, corporate, and municipal (muni) bonds at the index level over 2004-2020, I find a strong turn-of-the-year effect – low December returns and high January returns – in the high-yield muni index. The investment-grade muni index exhibits a similar but weaker effect. High-yield munis is the only class whose December returns are negatively correlated with year-to-date yield changes. Dominance of highly tax-sensitive households who engage in tax-loss selling, combined with opaqueness, low liquidity, and a small role of ETFs in munis make it difficult to arbitrage away the December price decreases. The investment-grade and high-yield corporate bond indices have abnormally high December returns in years with capital losses. The high-yield corporate index also has abnormally high December returns even in years without capital losses. It represents a change from the findings of prior research and suggests that corporate bond investors exhibit contrarian tendencies in December.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In the money markets, Park and Reinganum (1986) find that the first Treasury bill maturing in a year has a higher yield than the one immediately preceding it (i.e., the last bill maturing in a year). No year-end effect was found in longer-term Treasuries, however. The turn-of-the-year effect in the money market securities is likely driven by the year-end preference for liquidity (Ogden 1987; Griffiths and Winters 19972005) rather than window dressing (Musto 19971999). Tax-loss selling is not relevant because money market securities very rarely generate losses.

  2. A Bloomberg search for munis rated BB and below by S&P (Ba and below by Moody’s) returns about 3,600 securities with the par value of $408 billion ($468 billion).

  3. See Tables L.210 through L.213 in the Federal Reserve Statistical Release Z.1: Financial Accounts of the United States, Q3:2020, https://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/z1/20201210/z1.pdf.

  4. National in the category name refers to funds that invest in munis issued in different states, as opposed to funds specializing in munis issued by a single state. The word national is dropped throughout the rest of the paper.

  5. Financial advisors are more likely to recommend high-yield munis to households of truly significant wealth – those who can afford to take on higher credit risk in parts of their well-diversified portfolios. Financial advisors commonly suggest tax-loss selling to their clients (Cici et al. 2017; Starks et al. 2006).

References

  • Chang EC, Pinegar JM (1986) Return seasonality and tax-loss selling in the market for long-term government and corporate bonds. J Financ Econ 17:391–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen H, Estes J, Ngo T (2011) Tax calendar effects in the municipal bond market: tax-loss selling and cherry picking by investors and market timing by fund managers. Financ Rev 46:703–721

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheung W, Fung S, Tsai S (2010) Global capital market interdependence and spillover effect of credit risk: evidence from the 2007–2009 global financial crisis. Appl Financ Econ 20:85–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cici G, Kempf A, Sorhage C (2017) Do financial advisors provide tangible benefits for investors? Evidence from tax-motivated mutual fund flows. Rev Financ 21:637–665

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cochrane J (1999) Portfolio advice for a multifactor world. Economic Perspectives: federal Reserve Bank of Chicago 23:59–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper R, Shulman J (1994) The year-end effect in junk bonds. Financ Anal J 50:61–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doran J, Jiang D, Peterson D (2012) Gambling preference and the new year effect of assets with lottery features. Rev Financ 16:685–731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths M, White R (1993) Tax-induced trading and the turn of the year anomaly: an intraday study. J Financ 48:575–598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths M, Winters D (1997) On a preferred habitat for liquidity at the turn-of-the-year: evidence from the term-repo market. J Financ Ser Res 12:21–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths M, Winters D (2005) The turn of the year in money markets: tests of the risk-shifting window dressing and preferred habitat hypotheses. J Bus 78:1337–1363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris L, Piwowar M (2006) Secondary trading costs in the municipal bond market. J Financ 61:1361–1397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ivković Z, Poterba J, Weisbenner S (2005) Tax-motivated trading by individual investors. Am Econ Rev 95:1605–1630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan S, Jordan B (1991) Seasonality in daily bond returns. J Financ Quant Anal 26:269–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamstra M, Kramer L, Levi M, Wermers R (2017) Seasonal asset allocation: evidence from mutual fund flows. J Financ Quant Anal 52:71–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keim D (1983) Size-related anomalies and stock return seasonality: further empirical evidence. J Financ Econ 12:13–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotomin V, Smith S, Winters D (2014) Interest-rate and calendar-time effects in money market fund and bank deposit cash flows. J Econ Financ 38:84–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lakonishok J, Shleifer A, Thaler R, Vishny R (1991) Window dressing by pension fund managers. Am Econ Rev 81:227–231

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch A, Puckett A, Yan X (2014) Institutions and the turn-of-the-year effect: evidence from actual institutional trades. J Bank Financ 49:56–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell W (1998) The January effect in the corporate bond market: a systematic examination. Financ Manag 27:18–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLean R, Pontiff J (2016) Does academic research destroy stock return predictability? J Financ 71:5–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moody’s (2019) US municipal bond defaults and recoveries. 1970-2018

  • Musto D (1997) Portfolio disclosures and year-end price shifts. J Financ 52:1563–1588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Musto D (1999) Investment decisions depend on portfolio disclosures. J Financ 54:935–952

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ogden J (1987) The end of the month as a preferred habitat: a test of operational efficiency in the money market. J Financ Quant Anal 22:329–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park., S., and M. Reinganum, (1986) The puzzling behavior of treasury bills that mature at the turn of calendar months. J Financ Econ 16:267–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rakowski D, Wang X (2009) The dynamics of short-term mutual fund flows and returns: a time-series and cross-sectional investigation. J Bank Financ 33:2102–2109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reinganum M (1983) The anomalous stock market behavior of small firms in January. J Financ Econ 12:89–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritter J (1988) The buying and selling behavior of individual investors at the turn of the year. J Financ 43:701–717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roll R (1983) Vas ist das? The turn-of-the-year effect and the return premium of small firms. J Portf Manag 9:18–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rozeff M, Kinney W (1976) Capital market seasonality: the case of stock returns. J Financ Econ 3:379–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Securities and Exchange Commission (2012) Report on the municipal securities market. https://www.sec.gov/news/studies/2012/munireport073112.pdf

  • Sias R, Starks L (1997) Institutions and individuals at the turn-of-the-year. J Financ 52:1543–1562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Standard and Poor’s (2016) Unveiling the hidden cost of retail bond buying & selling. https://media.spglobal.com/documents/SPGI-fixed-income-update-unveiling-the-hidden-cost-of-retail-bond-buying-and-selling-august-2016.pdf

  • Starks L, Yong L, Zheng L (2006) Tax-loss selling and the January effect: evidence from municipal bond closed-end funds. J Financ 61:3049–3067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warther V (1995) Aggregate mutual fund flows and security returns. J Financ Econ 39:209–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheelock D, Wohar M (2009) Can the term spread predict output growth and recessions? A survey of the literature. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Rev 91:419–440

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I am thankful for helpful comments from Drew Winters and seminar participants at Illinois State University. The author thanks the Department of Finance, Insurance & Law at Illinois State University for financial support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vladimir Kotomin.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kotomin, V. The clientele effect around the turn of the year: evidence from the bond markets. J Econ Finan 45, 637–653 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12197-021-09550-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12197-021-09550-y

Keywords

JEL classification

Navigation