Abstract
This study covers the period 1981–2014 and uses an unbalanced panel data set for 85 developing countries. It assesses the effect of remittances through per capita GDP on FDI inflows to Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) and compares its performance in attracting FDI with the other developing regions. The results show a positive effect of remittances on FDI, but it depends on the level of per capita GDP of the host country. That is, an increase in remittances by one standard deviation, on average, increases FDI inflows by 0.09% a year. Remittances have a positive effect on FDI in 43 countries, and eight of them are in SSA. In addition, a SSA country receives about 0.8% more FDI than the average country in ASIA, but there is no difference between SSA and Latin America and the Caribbean, and SSA and the Middle East and North Africa. Further, the growth rate of the host country’s GDP has a positive effect on FDI, which supports the market size hypothesis.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The International Monetary Fund (IMF) defines FDI as an investment that represents at least 10% of voting stocks in an enterprise operating in a country other than that of the investor. In this study, FDI is net inflows of FDI as share of host country GDP and represents at least 10% of voting stock. It is the sum of equity capital, reinvestment of earnings, and other long term and short-term capital.
Remittances are the sum of personal transfers and compensation of employees as defined in the sixth edition of the IMF’s Balance of Payments Manual.
A host country is a recipient of FDI.
Moosa’s (2002) chapter 2 provides a description of the theories of FDI.
Appreciation of the host country’s currency against the U.S. dollar is expected to negatively affect FDI inflows.
The threshold for per capita GDP is its log value that makes the sum of remittances and the interaction term positive, or \( \mathit{\log}\ GDP\ per\ capita\kern0.5em \ge \left(-\frac{\beta_{remittances}}{\beta_{remittances\ast GDPpc}}\right) \). However, if the two coefficients are positive (negative), remittances have an unambiguously positive (negative) effect on FDI inflows.
References
Abbott A, Cushman DO, DeVita G (2012) Exchange rates regimes and foreign direct investment flows to developing countries. Rev Int Econ 20(1):95–107
Agosin MR, Machado R (2006) Openness and the international allocation of foreign direct investment. Economic and sector studies series, pp RE2–06-004
Asiedu E (2002) On the development of foreign direct investment to developing countries: is Africa different? World Dev 30:107–119
Asiedu E, Esfahani HS (2001) Ownership structure in foreign direct investment projects. Rev Econ Stat 83:647–662
Bajo-Rubio O, Sosvilla-Rivero S (1994) An econometric analysis of foreign direct Investment in Spain, 1964-89. South Econ J 61(1):104–120
Balasubramanyam VN, Salisu M, Sapsford D (1996) Foreign direct investment and growth in EP and IS countries. Economic Journal 106:92–105
Barrel R, Pain N (1996) An econometric analysis of U.S. foreign direct investment. Rev Econ Stat 78(2):200–207
Barro R, Sala-i-Martin X (2004) Economic growth, 2nd ed. MITPress, Cambridge
Bengoa M, Sanchez-Robles B (2003) Foreign direct investment, economic freedom and growth: new evidence from Latin America. Eur J Polit Econ 19:529–545
Billington N (1999) The location of foreign direct investment: an empirical analysis. Appl Econ 31:65–76
Blonigen BA, Fenstra RC (1996) Protectionist threats and foreign direct investment. NBER Working Papers Series. Working Paper no. 5475. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge
Borovnik M (2003) Seafarers in Kiribati – Consequences of International Labour Circulation. Dissertation, University of Canterbury
Brenton P, Di Mauro F, Lücke M (1999) Economic integration and FDI: an empirical analysis of foreign investment in the EU and in central and Eastern Europe. Empirica 26:95–121
Bruno M, Easterly W (1998) Inflation crises and long run growth. J Monet Econ 41:3–26
Cameron AC, Trivedi PK (2005) Microeconometrics. Cambridge University Press, New York
Campos NF, Kinoshita Y (2002) Foreign direct investment as technology transferred: some panel evidence from the transition economies. Manch Sch 70(3):398–419
Chami R, Fullenkamp C, Jahjah S (2005) Are immigrant remittance flows a source of capital for development? IMF Staff Pap 52(1):55–81
Clark P (2004) The economic impact of contracted labour upon the livelihoods of small Pacific Island states: an examination of the expenditure patterns of I-Kiribati and Tuvaluan seafarers and their dependents. Dissertation, University of Queensland
Cukierman A, Kalaitzidakis P, Summers L, Webb SB (1993) Central Bank Independence, growth, investment, and Real Estates. Carn-Roch Conf Ser Public Policy 39:95–140
Culem CG (1988) The location determinants of direct investments among industrialized countries. Eur Econ Rev 32:885–904
Cushman DO (1985) Real exchange rate risk, expectations, and the level of direct investment. Rev Econ Stat 67(2):297–308
Cushman DO (1987) The effects of real wages and labor productivity on foreign direct investment. South Econ J 54(1):174–185
Cushman DO (1988) Exchange-rate uncertainty and foreign direct Investment in the United States. Weltwirtschaftliches Archive 124(2):322–336
Dornbush R, Fischer S (1994) Macroeconomics, 6th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York
Fedderke JW, Romm AT (2006) Growth impact and the determinants of foreign direct investment into South Africa, 1956-2003. Econ Model 23:738–760
Filippaios F, Papanastassiou M, Pearce P (2003) The evolution of U.S. outward foreign direct Investment in the Pacific rim: a cross-time and country analysis. Appl Econ 35:1779–1787
Findlay SE, Sow S (1998) From season to season: agriculture, poverty, and migration in the Senegal River valley, Mali. In: Appleyard R (ed) Emigration dynamics in developing countries: sub-Saharan Africa. Ashgate Publishing Limited, London, pp 69–144
Fischer S (1993) The role of macroeconomics factors in growth. J Monet Econ 32:485–512
Froot KA, Stein JC (1991) Exchange rates and foreign direct investment: an imperfect capital markets approach. Q J Econ 106(4):1191–1217
Garcia-Fuentes PA, Kennedy PL (2011) Foreign direct investment inflows to Latin America and the Caribbean: remittances and market size. Journal of International Agricultural Trade and Development 7(1):1–21
Garcia-Fuentes PA, Kennedy PA, Ferreira G (2016) US foreign direct Investment in Latin America and the Caribbean: a case of remittances and market size. Appl Econ 48(1):5008–5021
Giuliano P, Ruiz-Arranz M (2009) Remittances, financial development, and growth. J Dev Econ 90:144–152
Globerman S, Shapiro D (1999) The impact of government policies on foreign direct investment: the Canadian experience. J Int Bus Stud 30(3):513–532
Glytsos NP (2005) The contribution of remittances to growth: a dynamic approach and empirical analysis. J Econ Stud 32(6):468–496
Gopinath M, Pick D, Vasavada U (1999) The economics of foreign direct investment and trade with an application to the U.S. food processing industry. Am J Agric Econ 81:442–452
Haggard S (1989) The political economy of foreign direct Investment in Latin America. Lat Am Res Rev 24(1):184–208
Hansen H, Rand J (2006) On the causal link between FDI and growth in developing countries. World Econ 29(1):21–41
Lall P, Norman DW, Featherstone AM (2003) Determinants of U.S. direct Investment in the Caribbean. Appl Econ 35:1485–1496
Lemi A, Asefa S (2003) Foreign direct investment and uncertainty: empirical evidence from Africa. Afr Financ J 5:36–67
Li X, Liu X (2005) Foreign direct investment and economic growth: an increasing endogenous relationship. World Dev 33(3):393–407
Love JH, Lage-Hidalgo F (2000) Analysing the determinants of US direct investment in Mexico. Appl Econ 32:1259–1267
Love JH, Lage-Hidalgo F (2003) Technology sourcing versus technology exploitation: an analysis of US foreign direct investment flows. Appl Econ 35:1667–1678
Markusen JR (1983) Factor movements and commodity trade as complements. J Int Econ 14:341–356
Moosa IA (2002) Foreign direct investment: theory, evidence and practice. Palgrave, New York
Morrisset P (2000) Foreign direct investment to Africa: policies also matter. Transl Corp 9:107–125
Mundell RA (1957) International trade and factor mobility. Am Econ Rev 47(3):321–335
Nigh D (1985) The effect of political events on United States direct foreign investment: a pooled time-series cross-sectional analysis. J Int Bus Stud 16(1):1–17
Noorbakhsh F, Paloni A, Youssef A (2001) Human capital and FDI inflows to developing countries: new empirical evidence. World Dev 29:1593–1610
Onyeiwu S, Shrestha H (2004) Determinants of foreign direct Investment in Africa. J Dev Soc 20:89–106
Reinhart C M, Rogoff K S (2002) FDI to Africa: the role of Price stability and currency instability. Paper prepared for the annual World Bank conference on development economics, Washington, DC, April, 29–30
Romer D (2006) Advanced macroeconomics, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill/Irwin, New York
Stevens GVG (1998) Exchange rates and foreign direct investment: a note. J Policy Model 20(3):393–401
Temple J (1999) The new growth evidence. J Econ Lit 37:112–156
Tuman JP, Emmert CF (2004) The political economy of U.S. foreign direct Investment in Latin America: a reappraisal. Lat Am Res Rev 39(3):9–29
UNCTAD (2014) Economic development in Africa report 2014. Catalysing Investment for Transformative Growth in Africa. United Nations Organization, New York
UNCTAD (2018) World investment report 2018. United Nations, Switzerland
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development [UNCTAD] (2002) World investment report 2002. United Nations, Switzerland
Waldkirch A (2003) The new regionalism and foreign investment: the case of Mexico. J Int Trade Econ Dev 12(2):151–184
World Bank (ed) (2016) Migration and remittances fact book 2016, 3rd edn. World Bank, Washington, D.C
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendices
Appendix 1
1.1 Theoretical Model
The model assumes a TNC’s operations at home and abroad, so total costs are given by
where ch and qh are unit costs and the output level at the home plant, cf and qf are unit costs and the output level at the foreign plant, and subscripts h and f represent home and foreign, respectively.
Total output demand is given as
Hence, the Lagrangean function is
and the first order conditions for the cost minimization problem are
where \( {c}_h^{\prime }=\partial {c}_h/\partial {q}_h \) and \( {c}_f^{\prime }=\partial {c}_f/\partial {q}_f \). Equations (9) and (10) are the marginal costs at the home and foreign plants, respectively.
By equating (9) and (10) and solving for the home plant output (qh) and then substituting this result into eq. (11), we obtain the foreign plant’s output. That is, foreign production is given by
where \( {\varnothing}_1={c}_h^{\prime }/\left({c}_h^{\prime }+{c}_f^{\prime}\right) \) and \( {\varnothing}_2=1/\left({c}_h^{\prime }+{c}_f^{\prime}\right) \) and are assumed to be positive, and RUC = ch − cf and represents relative unit costs between the home and foreign countries. Equation (12) shows that the foreign plant’s output is positively related to total demand and relative unit costs.
Next, the TNC has to determine the level of inputs for producing at the foreign plant. Based on a Cobb-Douglas production function, foreign production is given as
Then, the costs associated with foreign production are given by
where w and r are the real wage and the real user cost of capital, respectively.
Assuming that the foreign plant’s costs are minimized, the Lagrangean function is defined by
Then, the first order conditions for the cost minimization problem are given by
Dividing eq. (16) by eq. (17) and then rearranging yields
Taking Lf from equation (18) and substituting it into (19) yields Kf as
Plugging equation (12) into (20) yields the final expression for the TNC’s optimal capital stock at the foreign plant as
Therefore, the TNC’s optimal capital stock at the foreign plant can be specified as
where the host country’s demand (qf) and relative unit costs (RUC) between the home and host countries have a positive effect on \( {K}_t^{\ast } \).
Appendix 2
Appendix 3
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Amponsah, W.A., Garcia-Fuentes, P.A. & Smalley, J.A. Remittances, market size, and foreign direct investment: a case of sub-Saharan Africa. J Econ Finan 44, 238–257 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12197-019-09484-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12197-019-09484-6