Abstract
Stem cell therapy is emerging as a promising clinical approach for myocardial repair. However, the interactions between the graft and host, resulting in inconsistent levels of integration, remain largely unknown. In particular, the influence of electrical activity of the surrounding host tissue on graft differentiation and integration is poorly understood. In order to study this influence under controlled conditions, an in vitro system was developed. Electrical pacing of differentiating murine embryonic stem (ES) cells was performed at physiologically relevant levels through direct contact with microelectrodes, simulating the local activation resulting from contact with surrounding electroactive tissue. Cells stimulated with a charged balanced voltage-controlled current source for up to 4 days were analyzed for cardiac and ES cell gene expression using real-time PCR, immunofluorescent imaging, and genome microarray analysis. Results varied between ES cells from three progressive differentiation stages and stimulation amplitudes (nine conditions), indicating a high sensitivity to electrical pacing. Conditions that maximally encouraged cardiomyocyte differentiation were found with Day 7 EBs stimulated at 30 μA. The resulting gene expression included a sixfold increase in troponin-T and a twofold increase in β-MHC without increasing ES cell proliferation marker Nanog. Subsequent genome microarray analysis revealed broad transcriptome changes after pacing. Concurrent to upregulation of mature gene programs including cardiovascular, neurological, and musculoskeletal systems is the apparent downregulation of important self-renewal and pluripotency genes. Overall, a robust system capable of long-term stimulation of ES cells is demonstrated, and specific conditions are outlined that most encourage cardiomyocyte differentiation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Beqqali, A., J. Kloots, D. Ward-van Oostwaard, C. Mummery, and R. Passier. Genome-wide transcriptional profiling of human embryonic stem cells differentiating to cardiomyocytes. Stem Cells 24:1957–1967, 2006.
Boheler, K. R., J. Czyz, D. Tweedie, H.-T. Yang, S. V. Anisimov, and A. M. Wobus. Differentiation of pluripotent embryonic stem cells into cardiomyocytes. Circ. Res. 91:189–201, 2002.
Cai, C.-L., X. Liang, Y. Shi, P.-H. Chu, S. L. Pfaff, J. Chen, and S. Evans. Isl1 identifies a cardiac progenitor population that proliferates prior to differentiation and contributes a majority of cells to the heart. Dev. Cell 5:877–889, 2003.
Cao, F., S. Lin, X. Xie, P. Ray, M. Patel, X. Zhang, M. Drukker, S. Dylla, A. J. Connolly, X. Chen, I. L. Weissman, S. S. Gambhir, and J. C. Wu. In vivo visualization of embryonic stem cell survival, proliferation, and migration after cardiac delivery. Circulation 113:1005–1014, 2006.
Chang, M. G., L. Tung, R. B. Sekar, C. Y. Chang, J. Cysyk, P. Dong, E. Marban, and R. Abraham. Proarrhythmic potential of mesenchymal stem cell transplantation revealed in an in vitro coculture model. Circulation 113:1832–1842, 2006.
Chen, M. Q., X. Xie, R. Hollis Whittington, G. T. Kovacs, J. C. Wu, and L. Giovangrandi. Cardiac differentiation of embryonic stem cells with point-source electrical stimulation. Conf. Proc. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. 2008:1729–1732, 2008.
Donaldson, N. N., and P. E. K. Donaldson. When are actively balanced biphasic (‘Lilly’) stimulating pulses necessary in a neurological prosthesis? I. Historical background; Pt resting potential; Q studies. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 24:41–49, 1986.
Dowell, J. D., M. Rubart, K. B. Pasumarthi, M. H. Soonpaa, and L. J. Field. Myocyte and myogenic stem cell transplantation in the heart. Cardiovasc. Res. 58:336–350, 2003.
Eiraku, M., A. Tohgo, K. Ono, M. Kaneko, K. Fujishima, T. Hirano, and M. Kengaku. DNER acts as a neuron-specific Notch ligand during Bergmann glial development. Nat. Neurosci. 8:873–880, 2005.
Hanna, L. A., R. K. Foreman, I. A. Tarasenko, D. S. Kessler, and P. A. Labosky. Requirement for Foxd3 in maintaining pluripotent cells of the early mouse embryo. Genes Dev. 16:2650–2661, 2002.
Karlsson, O., S. Thor, T. Norberg, H. Ohlsson, and T. Edlund. Insulin gene enhancer binding protein Isl-1 is a member of a novel class of proteins containing both a homeo- and a Cys-His domain. Nature 344:879–882, 1990.
Kehat, I., L. Khimovich, O. Caspi, A. Gepstein, R. Shofti, G. Arbel, I. Huber, J. Satin, J. Itskovitz-Eldor, and L. Gepstein. Electromechanical integration of cardiomyocytes derived from human embryonic stem cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 22:1282–1289, 2004.
Laugwitz, K.-L., A. Moretti, L. Caron, A. Nakano, and K. R. Chien. Islet1 cardiovascular progenitors: a single source for heart lineages? Development 135:193–205, 2008.
Leon, L. J., and F. A. Roberge. A model study of extracellular stimulation of cardiac cells. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 40:1307–1319, 1993.
Loeb, G. E., C. J. Zamin, J. H. Schulman, and P. R. Troyk. Injectable microstimulator for functional electrical stimulation. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 29:NS13–NS19, 1991.
Loh, Y.-H., Q. Wu, J.-L. Chew, V. B. Vega, W. Zhang, X. Chen, G. Bourque, J. George, B. Leong, J. Liu, K.-Y. Wong, K. W. Sung, C. W. H. Lee, X.-D. Zhao, K.-P. Chiu, L. Lipovich, V. A. Kuznetsov, P. Robson, L. W. Stanton, C.-L. Wei, Y. Ruan, B. Lim, and H.-H. Ng. The Oct4 and Nanog transcription network regulates pluripotency in mouse embryonic stem cells. Nat. Genet. 38:431–440, 2006.
Maltsev, V. A., A. M. Wobus, J. Rohwedel, M. Bader, and J. Hescheler. Cardiomyocytes differentiated in vitro from embryonic stem cells developmentally express cardiac-specific genes and ionic currents. Circ. Res. 75:233–244, 1994.
Merrill, D. R., M. Bikson, and J. G. Jefferys. Electrical stimulation of excitable tissue: design of efficacious and safe protocol. J. Neurosci. Methods 141:171–198, 2005.
Olson, E. N. Gene regulatory networks in the evolution and development of the heart. Science 313:1922–1927, 2006.
Radisic, M., H. Park, H. Shing, T. Consi, F. J. Schoen, R. Langer, L. E. Freed, and G. Vunjak-Novakovic. Functional assembly of engineered myocardium by electrical stimulation of cardiac myocytes cultured on scaffolds. Proc Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101:18129–18134, 2004.
Rose, T. L., and L. S. Roblee. Electrical stimulation with Pt electrodes. VII. Electrochemically safe charge injection limits with 0.2 ms pulses. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 37:1118–1120, 1990.
Sauer, H., G. Rahimi, J. Hescheler, and M. Wartenberg. Effects of electrical fields on cardiomyocyte differentiation of embryonic stem cells. J. Cell. Biochem. 75:710–723, 1999.
Segers, V., and R. Lee. Stem-cell therapy for cardiac disease. Nature 451:937–942, 2008.
Toyofuku, T., H. Zhang, A. Kumanogoh, N. Takegahara, M. Yabuki, K. Harada, M. Hori, and H. Kikutani. Guidance of myocardial patterning in cardiac development by Sema6D reverse signalling. Nat. Cell Biol. 6:1204–1211, 2004.
Whittington, R. H., L. Giovangrandi, and G. T. A. Kovacs. A closed-loop electrical stimulation system for cardiac cell cultures. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 52:1261–1270, 2005.
Wollert, K. C., and H. Drexler. Clinical application of stem cells for the heart. Circ. Res. 96:151–163, 2005.
Yamada, M., K. Tanemura, S. Okada, A. Iwanami, M. Nakamura, H. Mizuno, M. Ozawa, R. Ohyama-Goto, N. Kitamura, M. Kawano, K. Tan-Takeuchi, C. Ohtsuka, A. Miyawaki, A. Takashima, M. Ogawa, Y. Toyama, H. Okano, and T. Kondo. Electrical stimulation modulates fate determination of differentiating embryonic stem cells. Stem Cells 25:562–570, 2007.
Yang, D. H., and E. G. Moss. Temporally regulated expression of Lin-28 in diverse tissues of the developing mouse. Gene Expr. Patterns 3:719–726, 2003.
Yang, L., M. H. Soonpaa, E. D. Adler, T. K. Roepke, S. J. Kattman, M. Kennedy, E. Henckaerts, K. Bonham, G. W. Abbott, R. M. Linden, L. J. Field, and G. M. Keller. Human cardiovascular progenitor cells develop from a KDR+ embryonic-stem-cell-derived population. Nature 453:524–528, 2008.
Yoshida, Y., B. Han, M. Mendelsohn, and T. M. Jessell. PlexinA1 signaling directs the segregation of proprioceptive sensory axons in the developing spinal cord. Neuron 52:775–788, 2006.
Yu, J., M. A. Vodyanik, K. Smuga-Otto, J. Antosiewicz-Bourget, J. L. Frane, S. Tian, J. Nie, G. A. Jonsdottir, V. Ruotti, R. Stewart, I. I. Slukvin, and J. A. Thomson. Induced pluripotent stem cell lines derived from human somatic cells. Science 318:1917–1920, 2007.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank R. Hollis Whittington for his role in developing the stimulation microelectrode arrays, and Omer Inan, Mozziyar Etemadi, and Richard Wiard for their help in developing the electrical stimulation hardware. This work was supported in part by the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine (CIRM) through cooperative agreement RS1-00232-1 (GTAK), by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) grants R21HL089027, R21HL091453, R33HL089027, RC1HL100490 (JCW), the Burroughs Wellcome Fund Career Award for Medical Scientists (BWF CAMS; JCW), and by the National Science Foundation Graduate Student Research Fellowship (NSF-GSRF; MQC).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The first two authors have contributed equally to this work.
Electronic supplementary material
Below are the links to the electronic supplementary material.
12195_2009_96_MOESM4_ESM.tif
Immunostaining of stimulated cells. Intermediate Stage ES cells stimulated at 30 μA for 4 days were trypsinized, lightly re-plated onto glass chamber slides, and imaged on a fluorescent microscope. Cardiomyocyte marker troponin-T, gap junction Cx43, and ES marker Oct4 were stained in green while nuclei were stained in blue (TIFF 2705 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, M.Q., Xie, X., Wilson, K.D. et al. Current-Controlled Electrical Point-Source Stimulation of Embryonic Stem Cells. Cel. Mol. Bioeng. 2, 625–635 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12195-009-0096-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12195-009-0096-0