Abstract
Our purpose in this study was to evaluate the variation in calculated doses caused by respiration in stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) of the lung. The study targeted ten patients who underwent SBRT for lung tumors. CT images were acquired during free breathing and in the inhalation and exhalation phases. We compared the CT image at inhalation with the image at exhalation so as to measure the change in lung volume, variation in the CT value, and displacement of the chest wall. The lung volume change was shown to be correlated with the maximum of the chest wall motion and with the variation in the CT value. A statistically significant difference was observed in the CT values between inhalation and exhalation (p < 0.05). The total dose variation at the isocenter was confined within ±2 %. However, the dose from individual beams can vary significantly when the chest wall moves more than 10 mm in natural breathing.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Onishi H, Shirato H, Nagata Y, Hiraoka M, Fujino M, Gomi K, Karasawa K, Hayakawa K, Niibe Y, Takai Y, Kimura T, Takeda A, Ouchi A, Hareyama M, Kokubo M, Kozuka T, Arimoto T, Hara R, Itami J, Araki T. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for operable stage I non-small-cell lung cancer: can SBRT be comparable to surgery? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011;81:1352–8.
Timmerman R, Paulus R, Galvin J, Michalski J, Straube W, Bradley J, Fakiris A, Bezjak A, Videtic G, Johnstone D, Fowler J, Gore E, Choy H. Stereotactic body radiation therapy for inoperable early stage lung cancer. JAMA. 2010;303:1070–6.
Shirato H, Onimaru R, Ishikawa M, Kaneko J, Takeshima T, Mochizuki K, Shimizu S, Umegaki K. Real-time 4-D radiotherapy for lung cancer. Cancer Sci. 2011;103:1–6.
Bengua G, Ishikawa M, Sutherland K, Horita K, Yamazaki R, Fujita K, Onimaru R, Katoh N, Inoue T, Onodera S, Shirato H. Evaluation of the effectiveness of the stereotactic body frame in reducing respiratory intrafractional organ motion using the real-time tumor-tracking radiotherapy system. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010;77:630–6.
Onishi H, Kawakami H, Marino K, Komiyama T, Kuriyama K, Araya M, Saito R, Aoki S, Araki T. A simple respiratory indicator for irradiation during voluntary breath holding: a one-touch device without electronic materials. Radiology. 2010;255:917–23.
Shirato H, Shimizu S, Shimizu T, Nishioka T, Miyasaka K. Real-time tumour-tracking radiotherapy. Lancet. 1999;353:1331–2.
Berbeco RI, Nishioka S, Shirato H, Chen GT, Jiang SB. Residual motion of lung tumours in gated radiotherapy with external respiratory surrogates. Phys Med Biol. 2005;50:3655–67.
Hunjan S, Starkschall G, Prado K, Dong L, Balter P. Lack of correlation between external fiducial positions and internal tumor positions during breath-hold CT. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010;76:1586–91.
Yamazaki R, Nishioka S, Date H, Shirato H, Koike T, Nishioka T. Investigation of the change in marker geometry during respiration motion: a preliminary study for dynamic-multi-leaf real-time tumor tracking. Radiat Oncol. 2012;7:218–22.
Chang D, Liu C, Dempsey JF, Palta JR, Kopea J, Louis D, Morris C, Chopra R, Olivier KR. Predicting changes in dose distribution to tumor and normal tissue when correcting for heterogeneity in radiotherapy for lung cancer. Am J Clin Oncol. 2007;30:57–62.
Chow JC, Leung MK, Van Dyk J. Variations of lung density and geometry on inhomogeneity correction algorithms: a Monte Carlo dosimetric evaluation. Med Phys. 2009;36:3619–30.
Aarup LR, Nahum AE, Zacharatou C, Juhler-Nøttrup T, Knöös T, Nyström H, Specht L, Wieslander E, Korreman SS. The effect of different lung densities on the accuracy of various radiotherapy dose calculation methods: implications for tumour coverage. Radiother Oncol. 2009;91:405–14.
Fragoso M, Wen N, Kumar S, Liu D, Ryu S, Movsas B, Munther A, Chetty IJ. Dosimetric verification and clinical evaluation of a new commercially available Monte Carlo-based dose algorithm for application in stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) treatment planning. Phys Med Biol. 2010;55:4445–64.
Plathow C, Zimmermann H, Fink C, Umathum R, Schöbinger M, Huber P, Zuna I, Debus J, Schlegel W, Meinzer HP, Semmler W, Kauczor HU, Bock M. Influence of different breathing maneuvers on internal and external organ motion: use of fiducial markers in dynamic MRI. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005;62:238–45.
Mexner V, Wolthaus JW, van Herk M, Damen EM, Sonke JJ. Effects of respiration-induced density variations on dose distributions in radiotherapy of lung cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009;74:1266–75.
Graham MV, Purdy JA, Emami B, Harms W, Bosch W, Lockett MA, Perez CA. Clinical dose–volume histogram analysis for pneumonitis after 3D treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1999;45:323–9.
Barriger RB, Forquer JA, Brabham JG, Andolino DL, Shapiro RH, Henderson MA, Johnstone PA, Fakiris AJ. A dose–volume analysis of radiation pneumonitis in non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012;82:457–62.
Jo IY, Kay CS, Kim JY, Son SH, Kang YN, Jung JY, Kim KJ. Significance of low-dose radiation distribution in development of radiation pneumonitis after helical-tomotherapy-based hypofractionated radiotherapy for pulmonary metastases. J Radiat Res. 2013;1–8.
Admiraal MA, Schuring D, Hurkmans CW. Dose calculations accounting for breathing motion in stereotactic lung radiotherapy based on 4D-CT and the internal target volume. Radiother Oncol. 2008;86:55–60.
Tian Y, Wang Z, Ge H, Zhang T, Cai J, Kelsey C, Yoo D, Yin FF. Dosimetric comparison of treatment plans based on free breathing, maximum, and average intensity projection CTs for lung cancer SBRT. Med Phys. 2012;39:2754–60.
Conflict of interest
No actual or potential conflicts of interest exist for all authors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Yamazaki, R., Onimaru, R., Katoh, N. et al. Influence of respiration on dose calculation in stereotactic body radiotherapy of the lung. Radiol Phys Technol 7, 284–289 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12194-014-0263-4
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12194-014-0263-4