Abstract
In image-guided brain tumor surgery, intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (iMRI) is a powerful tool for updating navigational information after brain shift, controlling the resection of brain tumors, and evaluating intraoperative complications. Low-field iMRI scans occasionally generate a lot of noise, the reason for which is yet to be determined. This noise adversely affects the neurosurgeons’ interpretations. In this study, in order to improve the image quality of iMR images, we optimized and adapted an unbiased non-local means (UNLM) filter to iMR images. This noise appears to occur at a specific frequency-encoding band. In order to adapt the UNLM filter to the noise, we improved the UNLM, so that de-noising can be performed at different noise levels that occur at different frequency-encoding bands. As a result, clinical iMR images can be de-noised adequately while preserving crucial information, such as edges. The UNLM filter preserved the edges more clearly than did other classical filters attached to an anisotropic diffusion filter. In addition, UNLM de-noising can improve the signal-to-noise ratio of clinical iMR images by more than 2 times (p < 0.01). Although the computational time of the UNLM processing is very long, post-processing of UNLM filter images, for which the parameters were optimized, can be performed during other MRI scans. Therefore, The UNLM filter was more effective than increasing the number of signal averages. The iMR image quality was improved without extension of the MR scanning time. UNLM de-noising in post-processing is expected to improve the diagnosability of low-field iMR images.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Nimsky C, Ganslandt O, Cerny S, et al. Quantification of, visualization of, and compensation for brain shift using intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging. Neurosurgery. 2000;47(5):1070–9.
Mizukuchi T, Tsuzaka M. Evaluation and quality assurance of the image quality of an intraoperative magnetic resonance image, EPOS. ECR 2013;1–16. doi:10.1594/ecr2013/C-1673.
Buades A, Coll B, Morel M. A review of image denoising algorithms, with a new one. Multiscale Model Simul. 2005;4(2):490–530.
Perona P, Malik J. Scale-space and edge detection using anisotropic diffusion. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 1990;12(7):629–39.
Grieg G, Kubler O, Kikinis R, Jolesz FA. Nonlinear anisotropic filtering of MRI data. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1992;11(2):221–32.
Manjón JV, Carbonell-Caballero J, Lull JJ, García-Martí G, Martí-Bonmatí L, Robles M. MRI denoising using non-local means. Med Image Anal. 2008;12:514–23.
Wiest-Daesslé N, Prima S, Coupé P, Morrissey SP, Barillot C. Rician noise removal by non-local means filtering for low signal-to-noise ratio MRI: applications to DT-MRI. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2008;11(2):171–9.
Cllins DL, Zijdenbos AP, Kollokian V, Kabani NJ, Holmes CJ, Evans AC. Design and construction of a realistic digital brain phantom. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1998;17(3):463–8.
Coupé P, Yger P, Barillot C. Fast non local means denoising for 3D MR images. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2006;9(2):33–40.
Sijbers J, Den Dekker AJ, Van Audekerke MV, Van Dyck D. Estimation of the noise in magnitude MR images. Magn Reson Imaging. 1998;16(1):87–90.
Sijbers J, den Dekker AJ, Van Dyck D. Parameter estimation from magnitude MR images. Int J Imaging Syst Technol. 1999;10(2):109–14.
Mahmoudi M, Sapiro G. Fast image and video denoising via non-local means of similar neighborhoods. IMA Preprint Series 2052, 2005.
Acknowledgments
This manuscript was partly supported by Akiyoshi Ohtsuka Fellowship of the Japanese Society of Radiological Technology for improvement in English expression of a draft version of the manuscript.
Conflict of interest
We have no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Mizukuchi, T., Fujii, M., Hayashi, Y. et al. Adapting non-local means of de-noising in intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging for brain tumor surgery. Radiol Phys Technol 7, 124–132 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12194-013-0241-2
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12194-013-0241-2