Skip to main content
Log in

Observer-independent nodule-detectability index for low-dose lung cancer screening CT: a pilot study

  • Published:
Radiological Physics and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For the wide dissemination of lung cancer screening by low-dose computed tomography (CT), it is important to determine the optimal conditions for scan and image reconstruction based on objective standards of evaluation. Our aim in this study was to propose a quantitative index of nodule detectability without an observer test. It was essential to determine the apparent size and density of nodules visible on CT images for developing the nodule-detectability index based on a statistical observer-independent method. Therefore, we introduced a computer simulation technique for CT images based on the spatial resolution of the system to evaluate the size and density accurately. By use of scan/reconstruction parameter settings as employed for low-dose CT screening, a detectability index was obtained for target nodules (ideal spheres) of various sizes and with varying contrast (ΔCT) between nodule density and background density. The index was compared with the qualitative results of observer tests of nodule detectability. As the target nodule diameter or ΔCT was increased, the index value increased, implying improved nodule visibility. According to the index, the detection limits for nodules with ΔCTs of 70, 100, or 150 Hounsfield units were approximately 6, 5, and 4 mm in diameter, respectively. Index values were well correlated with nodule detectability as assessed by four observers. The proposed index was effective for quantifying nodule detectability, and its validity was confirmed by an observer test. This index has potential use in the determination of optimal scan/reconstruction parameters for lung cancer screening by low-dose CT without observer test.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. National Lung Screening Trial Research Team, Aberle DR, Adams AM, Berg CD, Black WC, Clapp JD, Fagerstrom RM, Gareen IF, Gatsonis C, Marcus PM, Sicks JD. Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:395–409.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Silverman JD, Paul NS, Siewerdsen JH. Investigation of lung nodule detectability in low-dose 320-slice computed tomography. Med Phys. 2009;36:1700–10.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Koyama H, Ohno Y, Kono AA, Kusaka A, Konishi M, Yoshii M, Sugimura K. Effect of reconstruction algorithm on image quality and identification of ground-glass opacities and partly solid nodules on low-dose thin-section CT: experimental study using chest phantom. Eur J Radiol. 2010;74:500–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Itoh S, Ikeda M, Arahata S, Kodaira K, Isomura T, Kato T, Yamakawa K, Maruyama K, Ishigaki T. Lung cancer screening: minimum tube current required for helical CT. Radiology. 2000;215:175–83.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Mayo JR, Kim KI, MacDonald SL, Johkoh T, Kavanagh P, Coxson HO, Vedal S. Reduced radiation dose helical chest CT: effect on reader evaluation of structures and lung findings. Radiology. 2004;232:749–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Funama Y, Awai K, Liu D, Oda S, Yanaga Y, Nakaura T, Kawanaka K, Shimamura M, Yamashita Y. Detection of nodules showing ground-glass opacity in the lungs at low-dose multidetector computed tomography: phantom and clinical study. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2009;33:49–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Christe A, Torrente JC, Lin M, Yen A, Hallett R, Roychoudhury K, Schmitzberger F, Vock P, Roos J. CT screening and follow-up of lung nodules: effects of tube current-time setting and nodule size and density on detectability and of tube current-time setting on apparent size. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;197:623–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Chao EH, Toth TL, Bromberg NB, Williams EC, Fox SH, Carleton DA. A statistical method of defining low contrast detectability (abstr). Radiology. 2000;217:162.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Shin HO, Falck CV, Galanski M. Low-contrast detectability in volume rendering: a phantom study on multidetector-row spiral CT data. Eur Radiol. 2004;14:341–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. von Falck C, Hartung A, Berndzen F, King B, Galanski M, Shin HO. Optimization of low-contrast detectability in thin-collimated modern multidetector CT using an interactive sliding-thin-slab averaging algorithm. Invest Radiol. 2008;43:229–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hsieh J. Computed tomography: principles, design, artifacts, and recent advances. 2nd ed. Bellingham: SPIE Press; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ohkubo M, Wada S, Kunii M, Matsumoto T, Nishizawa K. Imaging of small spherical structures in CT: simulation study using measured point spread function. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2008;46:273–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Prevrhal S, Fox JC, Shepherd JA, Genant HK. Accuracy of CT-based thickness measurement of thin structures: modeling of limited spatial resolution in all three dimensions. Med Phys. 2003;30:1–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Rollano-Hijarrubia E, Stokking R, van der Meer F, Niessen WJ. Imaging of small high-density structures in CT A phantom study. Acad Radiol. 2006;13:893–908.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Polacin A, Kalender WA, Brink J, Vannier MA. Measurement of slice sensitivity profiles in spiral CT. Med Phys. 1994;21:133–40.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ohkubo M, Wada S, Kayugawa A, Matsumoto T, Murao K. Image filtering as an alternative to the application of a different reconstruction kernel in CT imaging: feasibility study in lung cancer screening. Med Phys. 2011;38:3915–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Muramatsu Y, Tsuda Y, Nakamura Y, Kubo M, Takayama T, Hanai K. The development and use of a chest phantom for optimizing scanning techniques on a variety of low-dose helical computed tomography devices. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2003;27:364–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ohkubo M, Wada S, Matsumoto T, Nishizawa K. An effective method to verify line and point spread functions measured in computed tomography. Med Phys. 2006;33:2757–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ohkubo M, Wada S, Ida S, Kunii M, Kayugawa A, Matsumoto T, Nishizawa K, Murao K. Determination of point spread function in computed tomography accompanied with verification. Med Phys. 2009;36:2089–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Dougherty G, Newman D. Measurement of thickness and density of thin structures by computed tomography: a simulation study. Med Phys. 1999;26:1341–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Funaki A, Ohkubo M, Wada S, Murao K, Matsumoto T, Niizuma S. Application of CT-PSF-based computer-simulated lung nodules for evaluating the accuracy of computer-aided volumetry. Radiol Phys Technol. 2012;5:166–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ohno K, Ohkubo M, Marasinghe JC, Murao K, Matsumoto T, Wada S. Accuracy of lung nodule density on HRCT: analysis by PSF-based image simulation. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2012;13:277–92.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Itoh S, Ikeda M, Mori Y, Suzuki K, Sawaki A, Iwano S, Satake H, Arahata S, Isomura T, Ozaki M, Ishigaki T. Lung: feasibility of a method for changing tube current during low-dose helical CT. Radiology. 2002;224:905–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Li J, Udayasankar UK, Toth TL, Seamans J, Small WC, Kalra MK. Automatic patient centering for MDCT: effect on radiation dose. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007;188:547–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Wachsberger PR, Burd R, Cardi C, Thakur M, Daskalakis C, Holash J, Yancopoulos GD, Dicker AP. VEGF trap in combination with radiotherapy improves tumor control in u87 glioblastoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007;67:1526–37.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Jiang S, Pogue BW, Carpenter CM, Poplack SP, Wells WA, Kogel CA, Forero JA, Muffly LS, Schwartz GN, Paulsen KD, Kaufman PA. Evaluation of breast tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy with tomographic diffuse optical spectroscopy: case studies of tumor region-of-interest changes. Radiology. 2009;252:551–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported in part by a Grant-in-Aid for Cancer Research (19–25) from the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare, Japan, and by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C) (23602005).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shinichi Wada.

About this article

Cite this article

Ohkubo, M., Wada, S., Kanai, S. et al. Observer-independent nodule-detectability index for low-dose lung cancer screening CT: a pilot study. Radiol Phys Technol 6, 492–499 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12194-013-0225-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12194-013-0225-2

Keywords

Navigation