Abstract
Scientific knowledge has long been showing the intrinsic link between health and well-being with education highlighting the positive health impacts from improvements in education. The present study was developed with the main goal of analyzing the individual and sociodemographic predictors of prosocial behavior and academic performance in preschool and elementary school children. Data on 3623 school aged children, 1853 girls and 1770 boys, aged between 5 and 11 years old (M = 7.25; SD = 1.56) participating in the study “Psychological Health and Well-being | School Observatory” were analyzed. Prosocial behavior was measured by the SDQ, and academic performance was assessed by the students’ classifications on different domains/subjects. The results of regression analyses showed that girls with less emotional, hyperactivity, behavioral and peer problems had more prosocial behaviors. Younger preschool children with more support from school social action tier, less hyperactivity problems and more prosocial behavior presented better academic performance. Elementary school children with parents/caregivers with higher educational attainment, more support from school social action tier, fewer hyperactivity and emotional symptoms and more prosocial and behavior problems presented better academic performance. We can conclude that gender and internalizing and externalizing symptoms are related to prosocial behavior and that hyperactivity problems and higher social action levels are related to a poorer academic performance. Future in depth studies will focus on the mechanisms of these relationships to better inform strategies for the promotion of prosocial behavior and academic performance. This is an important message for parents, educators, and teachers as well as for public policies in education, whenever pupils’ psychological well-being and their academic growth is concerned.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
All data and materials are available upon request from Nuno Neto Rodrigues.
Notes
In this document, for the purpose of simplifying the reading, the term “students” will sometimes be chosen, regardless of whether referring to children enrolled in pre-school education or students enrolled in the 1st cycle of basic education.
References
Albert, C., & Davia, M. A. (2011). Education is a key determinant of health in Europe: A comparative analysis of 11 countries. Health Promotion International, 26(2), 163–170. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daq059
Armstrong-Carter, E., Miller, J. G., Hill, L. J., & Domingue, B. W. (2021). Young children’s prosocial behavior protects against academic risk in neighborhoods with low socioeconomic status. Child Development, 92(4), 1509–1522. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13549
Cowan, P. A., Cowan, C. P., Schulz, M. S., & Heming, G. (1994). Prebirth to preschool family factors in children’s adaptation to kindergarten. Exploring Family Relationships with Other Social Contexts, 4, 75–114.
Cunico, L., Sartori, R., Marognolli, O., & Meneghini, A. M. (2012). Developing empathy in nursing students: A cohort longitudinal study. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 21(13–14), 2016–2025. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04105.x
Dias, P., Veríssimo, L., Carneiro, A., & Figueiredo, B. (2022). Academic achievement and emotional and behavioural problems: The moderating role of gender. Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 13591045211059410. https://doi.org/10.1177/13591045211059410. (Advance online publication).
Donkin, A., Goldblatt, P., Allen, J., et al. (2017). Global action on the social determinants of health. BMJ Global Health, 3, e000603. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000603
Eisenberg, N., Eggum, N. D., & Di Giunta, L. (2010). Empathy-related responding: Associations with prosocial behavior, aggression, and intergroup relations. Social Issues and Policy Review, 4(1), 143–180. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-2409.2010.01020.x
Eisenberg, N., Fabes, R. A., & Spinrad, T. L. (2006). Prosocial development. In N. Eisenberg, W. Damon, & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Social, emotional, and personality development (pp. 646–718). John Wiley and Sons Inc.
Eisenberg, N., Spinrad, T. L., & Knafo-Noam, A. (2015). Prosocial development. In M. E. Lamb & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology and developmental science: Socioemotional processes (pp. 610–656). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118963418.childpsy315
Fabes, R. A., & Eisenberg, N. (1998). Meta-analyses of age and sex differences in children’s and adolescents’ prosocial behavior. Handbook of Child Psychology, 3, 1–29.
Flook, L., Goldberg, S. B., Pinger, L., & Davidson, R. J. (2015). Promoting prosocial behavior and self-regulatory skills in preschool children through a mindfulness-based kindness curriculum. Developmental Psychology, 51(1), 44–51. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038256
Flouri, E., & Sarmadi, Z. (2016). Prosocial behavior and childhood trajectories of internalizing and externalizing problems: The role of neighborhood and school contexts. Developmental Psychology, 52(2), 253–258. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000076
Gage, N. A., Adamson, R., MacSuga-Gage, A. S., & Lewis, T. J. (2017). The relation between the academic achievement of students with emotional and behavioral disorders and teacher characteristics. Behavioral Disorders, 43(1), 213–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/0198742917713211
Goodman, R. (1997). The strengths and difficulties questionnaire: A research note. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 38, 581–586. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1997.tb01545.x
Haller, E., Lubenko, J., Presti, G., Squatrito, V., Constantinou, M., Nicolaou, C., ..., Gloster, A. T. (2021). To help or not to help? Prosocial behavior, its association with well-being, and predictors of prosocial behavior during the coronavirus disease pandemic. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.775032.
Hamad, R., Elser, H., Tran, D. C., Rehkopf, D. H., & Goodman, S. N. (2018). How and why studies disagree about the effects of education on health: A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies of compulsory schooling laws. Social Science & Medicine, 198(212), 168–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.07.016
Hay, D. F., & Pawlby, S. (2003). Prosocial development in relation to children’s and mothers’ psychological problems. Child Development 74(5). https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00609.
Hinshaw, S. P. (1992). Externalizing behavior problems and academic underachievement in childhood and adolescence: Causal relationships and underlying mechanisms. Psychological Bulletin, 111(1), 127–155.
Huber, L., Plötner, M., & Schmitz, J. (2019). Social competence and psychopathology in early childhood: A systematic review. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 28(4), 443. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-018-1152-x
Hui, B. P., Ng, J. C., Berzaghi, E., Cunningham-Amos, L. A., & Kogan, A. (2020). Rewards of kindness? A meta-analysis of the link between prosociality and well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 146(12), 1084. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000298
Keilow, M., Sievertsen, H. H., Niclasen, J., & Obel, C. (2019). The strengths and difficulties questionnaire and standardized academic tests: Reliability across respondent type and age. PLoS ONE, 14(7), e0220193. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220193
Khanam, R., & Nghiem, S. (2018). Behavioural and emotional problems in children and educational outcomes: A dynamic panel data analysis. Administration and Policy in Mental Health, 45(3), 472–483. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-017-0837-7
King, G., McDougall, J., DeWit, D., Hong, S., Miller, L., Offord, D., Meyer, K., & LaPorta, J. (2005). Pathways to children’s academic performance and prosocial behaviour: Roles of physical health status, environmental, family, and child factors. International Journal of Disability Development and Education, 52(4), 313–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/10349120500348680
Laible, D., Carlo, G., Murphy, T., Augustine, M., & Roesch, S. (2014). Predicting children’s prosocial and co-operative behavior from their temperamental profiles: A person-centered approach. Social Development, 23(4), 734–752. https://doi.org/10.1111/sode.12072
Longobardi, E., Spataro, P., & Rossi-Arnaud, C. (2019). Direct and indirect associations of empathy, theory of mind, and language with prosocial behavior: Gender differences in primary school children. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 180(6), 266–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221325.2019.1653817
Malonda, E., Llorca, A., Mesurado, B., Samper, P., & Mestre, M. V. (2019). Parents or peers? Predictors of prosocial behavior and aggression: A longitudinal study. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2379. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02379
Malti, T., Averdijk, M., Zuffianò, A., Betts, L. R., Rotenberg, K. J., Ribeaud, D., & Eisner, M. P. (2016). Children’s trust and the development of prosocial behavior. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 40(3), 262–270. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025415584628
Malti, T., & Dys, S. P. (2018). From being nice to being kind: Development of prosocial behaviors. Current Opinion in Psychology, 20, 45–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.07.036
Martela, F., & Ryan, R. M. (2016). The benefits of benevolence: Basic psychological needs, beneficence, and the enhancement of well-being. Journal of Personality, 84(6), 750–764. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12215
Martin, K. M., & Huebner, E. S. (2007). Peer victimization and prosocial experiences and emotional well-being of middle school students. Psychology in the Schools, 44(2), 199–208. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20216
Marzocchi, G. M., Capron, C., Di Pietro, M., Duran Tauleria, E., Duyme, M., Frigerio, A., Gaspar, M. F., Hamilton, H., Pithon, G., Simões, A., & Thérond, C. (2004). The use of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) in southern European countries. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 13(Suppl 2), II40–II46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-004-2007-1
Matos, M. G., Branquinho, C., Noronha, C., Moraes, B., Santos, O., Carvalho, M., Simões, C., Marques, A., Tomé, G., Guedes, F., Cerqueira, A., Francisco, R., & Gaspar, T. (2022). Relatório técnico “Saúde psicológica e bem-estar – Observatório de Saúde Psicológica e Bem-Estar: Monitorização e Ação”. Disponível em https://www.dgeec.mec.pt/np4/%7B$clientServletPath%7D/?newsId=1357&fileName=SaudePsi_final.pdf. Accessed 20 Mar 2023
McLeod, J. D., Uemura, R., & Rohrman, S. (2012). Adolescent mental health, behavior problems, and academic achievement. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 53(4), 482–497. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022146512462888
Memmott-Elison, M. K., Holmgren, H. G., Padilla-Walker, L. M., & Hawkins, A. J. (2020). Associations between prosocial behavior, externalizing behaviors, and internalizing symptoms during adolescence: A meta-analysis. Journal of Adolescence, 80(1), 98–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2020.01.012
Miles, S., & Stipek, D. (2006). Contemporaneous and longitudinal associations between social behavior and literacy achievement in a sample of low-income elementary school children. Child Development, 77(1), 103–117. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.00859.x
Mundy, L. K., Canterford, L., Tucker, D., Bayer, J., Romaniuk, H., Sawyer, S., Lietz, P., Redmond, G., Proimos, J., Allen, N., & Patton, G. (2017). Academic performance in primary school children with common emotional and behavioral problems. Journal of School Health, 87(8), 593–601. https://doi.org/10.1111/josh.12531
Öner, Ö., Vatanartiran, S., & Karadeniz, S. (2019). Relationships between teacher-reported ADHD symptom profiles and academic achievement domains in a nonreferred convenience sample of first- to fourth-grade students. Psychiatry and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 29(4), 502–508. https://doi.org/10.1080/24750573.2018.1457488
Parker, J. G., & Asher, S. R. (1987). Peer relations and later personal adjustment: Are low-accepted children at risk? Psychological Bulletin, 102(3), 357. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.102.3.357
Pettit, G. S., Bates, J. E., & Dodge, K. A. (1997). Supportive parenting, ecological context, and children’s adjustment: A seven-year longitudianl study. Child Development, 68(5), 908–923. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1997.tb01970.x
Robinson, A. R., & Piff, P. K. (2017). Deprived, but not depraved: Prosocial behavior is an adaptive response to lower socioeconomic status. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 40, e341. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X17001108
Robson, D. A., Allen, M. S., & Howard, S. J. (2020). Self-regulation in childhood as a predictor of future outcomes: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 146(4), 324–354. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000227
Salla, J., Michel, G., Pingault, J. B., Lacourse, E., Paquin, S., Galera, C., Falissard, B., Boivin, M., Tremblay, R. E., & Cote, S. M. (2016). Childhood trajectories of inattention-hyperactivity and academic achievement at 12 years. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 25(11), 1195–1206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-016-0843-4
Sijtsema, J. J., Verboom, C. E., Penninx, B. W., Verhulst, F. C., & Ormel, J. (2014). Psychopathology and academic performance, social well-being, and social preference at school: The TRAILS study. Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 45(3), 273–284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-013-0399-1
Song, J. H., Colasante, T., & Malti, T. (2018). Helping yourself helps others: Linking children’s emotion regulation to prosocial behavior through sympathy and trust. Emotion, 18(4), 518.
Tamayo Martinez, N., Tiemeier, H., Luijk, M. P. C. M., et al. (2021). Aggressive behavior, emotional, and attention problems across childhood and academic attainment at the end of primary school. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 56(5), 837–846. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-021-02039-3
The Lancet Public Health. (2020). Education: A neglected social determinant of health. The Lancet Public Health, 5(7), e361. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30144-4
Van der Graaff, J., Carlo, G., Crocetti, E., et al. (2018). Prosocial behavior in adolescence: Gender differences in development and links with empathy. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 47(5), 1086–1099. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-017-0786-1
Verboom, C., Sijtsema, J., Verhulst, F., Penninx, B., & Ormel, J. (2014). Longitudinal associations between depressive problems, academic performance, and social functioning in adolescent boys and girls. Developmental Psychology, 50(1), 247–257. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032547
Wentzel, K. R. (2013). School adjustment. In W. Reynolds & G. Miller (Eds.), Handbook of Psychology, Vol. 7: Educational Psychology (pp. 213–231). Wiley.
Wentzel, K. R. (2015a). Prosocial behavior and schooling. Department of human development and quantitative methodology. University of Maryland at College Park.
Wentzel, K. R. (2015b). Competence within context: Implications for the development of positive students identities and motivation at school. In F. Guay, H. Marsch, D. M. McInerney, & R. G. Craven (Eds.), Self-Concept, motivation and identity: Underpinning success with research and practice (International Advances in Self Research) (pp. 299–336). Information Age Publishing.
Wentzel, K. R., & Watkins, D. E. (2011). Peer relationships and collaborative learning: Implications for instruction. In R. Mayer & P. Alexander (Eds.), Handbook of research on learning and instruction (pp. 322–343). Routledge.
Xiao, S. X., Hashi, E. C., Korous, K. M., & Eisenberg, N. (2019). Gender differences across multiple types of prosocial behavior in adolescence: A meta-analysis of the prosocial tendency measure-revised (PTM-R). Journal of Adolescence, 77, 41–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2019.09.003
Funding
This study was designed in an optimizing care perspective and developed under the support of the Portuguese Ministry of Education, in a partnership between the Directorate-General for Education and Science Statistics, the Directorate-General of Education, the National Program for the Promotion of School Success, the Aventura Social Team/ISAMB, University of Lisbon (scientific coordinator), the Portuguese Psychologists Association and the Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation.
No funding was received for conducting this specific study and to assist with the preparation of this specific manuscript, although the research team had a small grant to undertake the national survey and data analysis in a first period of the complete study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Cátia Branquinho, Margarida Gaspar de Matos and Nuno Neto Rodrigues contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation was performed by Cátia Branquinho, Catarina Noronha and Bárbara Moraes and Nuno Neto Rodrigues. Data collection was performed by Cátia Branquinho, Catarina Noronha, Bárbara Moraes and Nuno Neto Rodrigues. Data analyses were performed by Marina Carvalho and Margarida Gaspar de Matos. The original draft of the manuscript was written by Marina Carvalho, Cátia Branquinho, Catarina Noronha and Bárbara Moraes. Review and editing were performed by Marina Carvalho, Margarida Gaspar de Matos, and Nuno Neto Rodrigues. All authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Statement Regarding Informed Consent
Responses to the study required previous authorization of the students' parents/caregivers, and the acceptance of the informed consent information included in the online data collection instruments.
Statement Regarding Ethical Approval
The study was approved by the Portuguese Ministry of Education and by a Consultative Committee composed of members of the Portuguese Ministry of Education, the Directorate-General for Education and Science Statistics, the Directorate-General of Education, the Portuguese Psychologists Association, the Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation, the National Program for the Promotion of School Success and the Aventura Social Team/ISAMB, University of Lisbon (scientific coordinator).
Statement Regarding Research Involving Human Participants and/or Animals
The study was approved by the Portuguese Ministry of Education and the above referred Ethics Committee and was performed in accordance with the ethical standards of the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Competing Interests
The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Carvalho, M., Branquinho, C., Noronha, C. et al. Individual and Sociodemographic Factors Associated to Prosocial Behaviors and Academic Performance in Portuguese Preschool and Elementary School Children: Highlights from a National Study After COVID-19. Child Ind Res 17, 289–307 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-023-10086-2
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-023-10086-2