Abstract
Under what conditions does participatory monitoring and evaluation with children result in positive outcomes and transformational change on a personal, institutional and broader societal level? Using cases from Nepal and UK, the ‘Changescape’ structures the conditions that determine whether evidence from children participating in evaluation is utilised by decision-makers to shape services and inform strategic processes. The emerging model links context with the process of children’s participation and is grounded in case study research in which three evaluations were revisited: DFID funded ‘Rights through Evaluation’ research with ActionAid and a community-based organisation in Nepal; the evaluation of the Saying Power scheme, run by Save the Children across the UK; and the Croydon Children’s Fund evaluation in London. The discussion highlights how conditions for change and mechanisms of communication and collaboration can facilitate or block change in response to children’s participation in evaluation. The Change-scape helped to structure findings on how: context can affect the way in which policy makers and community members respond to children’s perspectives; capacity, confidence, and champions for children can affect decision-makers responses to children’s evidence; mechanisms of communication and collaboration can create more space for dialogue and increase commitment to change.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Highlighted in Symposium (James. A. James. A. Block. J. and Woodhead. M.) at the 3rd international conference: Childhood and Youth in Transition, Sheffield, July 2010
‘Exposure’ is a term used by ActionAid Nepal in terms of children being exposed to different people places and ideas, due to migrating to carpet factories or for other work, travelling to markets and even children going to school or moving around an area for work. (Johnson et al. 1995).
References
Alanen, L. (2005). Women’s studies/childhood studies: Parallels, links and perspectives. In J. Mason & T. Fattore (Eds.), Children taken seriously in theory, policy and practice. London: Jessica Kingsley Ltd.
Archer, M., Bhaskar, R., Collier, A., Lawson, T., & Norrie, A. (Eds.). (1998). Critical realism: Essential readings. London: Routledge.
Bachrach, P., & Baratz, M. S. (1970). Power and poverty: Theory and practice. New York: Oxford University Press. cited in Lukes, S. (2005, p17), Power: A radical view, Second edition, Palgrave Macmillan, Hampshire.
Bartlett, S. (2005). Good Governance: Making age part of the equation—an introduction. Children Youth and Environments, 15(2), 1–17.
Beazley, H., & Ennew, J. (2006). ‘Participatory methods and approaches: Tackling the two tyrannies. In V. Desai & R. B. Potter (Eds.), Doing development research. London: Sage Publications Ltd.
Bhaskar, R. (1986). Scientific realism and human emancipation, Verso, The Imprint of New Left Books, printed by the Thetford Press, Norfolk
Boothby, N., Strang, A., & Wessells, M. G. (2006). A world turned upside down: Social ecological approaches to children in war zones. Bloomfield: Kumarian.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: experiments by nature and design, President and Fellows of Harvard College, US
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1986). Ecology of the family as a context for human development: research perspectives. Development Psychology, 22, 732–42. cited in Boothby, N., Strang, A., & Wessells, M. G. (2006), A World Turned Upside Down: Social ecological approaches to children in war zones, Kumarian Press, Bloomfield, USA.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (Ed.). (2005). On making human beings human: Bioecological perspectives on human development, Sage. CA: Thousand Oaks.
Burawoy, M. (2003). Revisits: an outline of a theory of reflective ethnography. American Sociological Review, 68, 645–679.
Chambers, R. (2002). Relaxed and participatory appraisal: Notes on practical approaches and methods for participants in PRA/PLA-related familiarisation workshops, Institute of Development Studies, Brighton
Chambers, R. (2006). Transforming power: From zero-sum to win-win? In Eyben et al. (Eds.), Power: Exploring power for change, IDS Bulletin, Institute of Development Studies, Sussex (pp. 99–110)
Chawla, L., & Johnson, V. (2004). ‘Not for Children Only: Lessons learnt from young people’s participation’ in Critical Reflections, Future Directions, PLA Notes, Vol. 50, International Institute of Environment and Development (IIED), London
Cornwall, A. (2004). Spaces for Transformation? Reflections of power and difference in participation in development. In S. Hickey & G. Mohan (Eds.), Participation: From tyranny to transformation? Exploring new approaches to participation in development (pp. 75–91). London: Zed Books.
Corsaro, W. A. (1992). Interpretive reproduction in peer cultures. Social Psychology Quarterly, 55(2), 160–177.
Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions (2nd ed.). London: Sage Publications.
Ferguson, C. (1999). Global social policy principles: Human rights and social justice, Social Development Department, DFID, London
Hart, R. (1998). The developing capacities of children to participate. In V. Johnson et al. (Eds.), Stepping forward: Children and young people’s participation in the development process (pp. 27–31). London: IT Publications.
Hart, J. (2008). Business as usual? The global political economy of childhood poverty, young lives technical note No. 13, Department of International Development, University of Oxford
James, A., & Prout, A. (1997). Constructing and reconstructing childhood: Contemporary issues in the sociological study of childhood (2nd ed.). London: RoutledgeFalmer.
Johnson, V. (2010). Are children’s perspectives valued in changing contexts: revisiting a rights-based evaluation in Nepal’ Journal for International Development, Wiley Publishers.
Johnson, V., Hill, J., Rana, S., Bharadwaj, M., Sapkota, P., Lamichanne, R., et al. (1995). Listening to smaller voices: Children in an environment of change (Nepal case study). Kathmandu: ActionAid Nepal.
Johnson, V., Nurick, R., & Ivan-Smith, E. (2001). Rights through Evaluation: Putting child rights into practice in South Africa and Nepal, funded by Department for International Development (DFID), available on www.developmentfocus.org.uk
Kirby, P., & Bryson, S. (2002). Measuring the Magic? Evaluating and researching young people’s participation in public decision-making. London: Carnegie Young People’s Initiative.
Lansdown, G. (2005). The evolving capacities of the child, Innocenti, Unicef, Florence, referred to in Van Beers, H., Invernizzi, A., and Milne, B. eds. (2006), Beyond Article 12: Essential readings in children’s participation, Knowing Children, Bangkok
Lansdown, G. (2010). The realisation of children’s particiaption rights: Critical reflections. In B. Percy-Smith & N. Thomas (Eds.), ‘Conclusion’, a handbook of children and young people’s participation: perspectives from theory and practice. Routledge: Oxford.
Lerner, R. M. (2005). Foreword, Urie Bronfenbrenner: Career contributions of the consummate developmental scientist. In U. Bronfenbrenner (Ed.), On making human beings human: Bioecological perspectives on human development. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Mannion, G. (2010). After participation: The socio-spatial performance of intergenerational becoming. In B. Percy-Smith & N. Thomas (Eds.), A handbook of children and young people’s participation: Perspectives from theory and practice. Routledge: Oxford.
Marcus, R., Wilkinson, J., & Marshall, J. (2002). ‘Poverty Reduction Strategy papers (PRSPs)—What can they deliver for children in poverty’, draft from Childhood Poverty Research and Policy Centre (CHIP) website, accessed 30/06/09, www.childhoodpoverty.org/index.php?action=publicationdetails&id=43
Mayall, B. (2002). Conversations with children: working with general issues. In P. Christensen & A. James (Eds.), Research with children: Perspectives and practices. London: Routledge/Falmer.
Moncrieffe, J. (2009). Introduction: intergenerational transmissions: cultivating children’s agency? IDS Bulletin, 40(1), 1–8. IDS, Falmer, Brighton.
Patton, M. Q. (1997). Utilization-focused evlauation: The new century text (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage. cited in Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd Edition). Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Pawson, R., & Tilley, N. (1997). Realistic evaluation. London: Sage.
Percy-Smith, B. (2006). From consultation to social learning in community participation with young people. Children, Youth and Environments, 16(2), 153–179. Retrieved 12/3/10 from http://www.colorado.edu.journals/cye.
Robson, C. (2002). Real world research (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.
Sayer, A. (2000). Realism and social science. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Shier, H. (2010). Children as actors: navigating the tensions. Children and Society, 24, 24–37.
Stake, R. E. (2003). Case studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Strategies for qualitative inquiry (2nd ed., pp. 134–165). London: Sage Publications.
Sumner, A., Haddad, L., & Climent, G. L. (2009). ‘Rethinking Intergenerational Transmission(s): Does a wellbeing lens help? The case of nutrition’, IDS Bulletin, Vol 40: 1, Jan 2009, pp22-30, (Intergenerational transmissions: Cultivating agency), Institute of Development Studies
Theis, J. (2010). Children as active citizens: An agenda for children’s civil rights and civic engagement. In B. Percy-Smith & N. Thomas (Eds.), A handbook of children and young people’s participation: Perspectives from theory and practice. Routledge: Oxford.
Thomas, N. (2007). Towards a theory of children’s participation. International Journal of Children’s Rights, 16(3), 379–394.
Tisdall, K., Davis, J., Prout, A., & Hill, M. (2006). Children, young people and social inclusion: participation for what? Bristol: Policy.
Tudge, J. (2008). The everyday lives of young children: Culture, class and child rearing in diverse societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tudge, J., & Hogan, D. (2005). An ecological approach to observations of children’s everyday lives. In S. Greene & D. Hogan (Eds.), Researching children’s experience: Methods and approaches, Sage. London: Sage Publications Ltd.
White, S. C., & Choudhury, S. A. (2007). The politics of child participation in international development: The dilemma of agency. European Journal of Development Research, 19(4), 529–550.
White, S. C., & Choudhury, S. A. (2010). Children’s Participation in Bangladesh: Issues of agency and structures of violence. In B. Percy-Smith & N. Thomas (Eds.), A handbook of children and young people’s participation: Perspectives from theory and practice. Routledge: Oxford.
Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: design and methods, Applied social research methods, Volume 5 (3rd ed.). London: Sage Publications.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Johnson, V. Conditions for Change for Children and Young People’s Participation in Evaluation: ‘Change-Scape’. Child Ind Res 4, 577–596 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-010-9099-6
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-010-9099-6