Skip to main content
Log in

A retrospective analysis of treatment outcomes in 45 patients with cardiac light-chain amyloidosis: a single-center experience in Japan

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Hematology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The prognosis of cardiac light-chain (AL) amyloidosis is considered to be very poor. We studied the treatment efficacy and outcomes by retrospectively analyzing the clinical results of 45 patients with cardiac AL amyloidosis treated at our hospital between September 2008 and March 2016. The group of patients analyzed included 29 males and 16 females with a median age of 68 years. Their baseline median NT-proBNP, cTnT, and dFLC were 3167 pg/ml, 0.080 ng/ml, and 286.17 mg/l, respectively. Twenty-eight patients were in Cardiac Stage (CS) III and 17 patients were in Revised Prognostic Stage (RPS) IV. At the median follow-up of 10 months, the median overall survival (OS) was 16 months and 3-year OS was 35.9%. The patients in CS III showed significantly poorer survival rate than those in CS I or II (3-year OS: 12.2% vs. 65.8%, p = 0.0115) and the patients in RPS IV showed significantly poorer survival rate than those in RPS I, II, or III (3-year OS: 11.0% vs. 53.3%, p = 0.000914). Regardless of the therapeutic approaches, patients who achieved hematological CR or cardiac organ response demonstrated significantly improved prognosis. Therefore, achievement of hematological and organ responses is important in the treatment of cardiac AL amyloidosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Grogan M, Dispenzieri A. Natural history and therapy of AL cardiac amyloidosis. Heart Fail Rev. 2015;20:155–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Esplin BL, Gertz MA. Current trends in diagnosis and management of cardiac amyloidosis. Curr Probl Cardiol. 2013;38:53–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Shimazaki C, Hata H, Iida S, Ueda M, Katoh N, Sekijima Y, et al. Nationwide survey of 741 patients with systemic amyloid light-chain amyloidosis in Japan. Intern Med. 2018;57:181–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Liao R, Jain M, Teller P, Connors LH, Ngoy S, Skinner M, et al. Infusion light chains from patients with cardiac amyloidosis causes diastolic dysfunction in isolated mouse hearts. Circulation. 2001;104:1594–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Diomede L, Rognoni P, Lavatelli F, Romeo M, del Favero E, Cantù L, et al. A Caenorhabditis elegans-based assay recognizes immunoglobulin light chains causing heart amyloidosis. Blood. 2014;123:3543–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Dispenzieri A, Gertz MA, Kyle RA, Lacy MQ, Burritt MF, Therneau TM, et al. Serum cardiac troponins and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide: a staging system for primary systemic amyloidosis. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:3751–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kumar S, Dispenzieri A, Lacy MQ, Hayman SR, Buadi FK, Colby C, et al. Revised prognostic staging system for light chain amyloidosis incorporating cardiac biomarkers and serum free light chain measurements. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:989–95.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Palladini G, Dispenzieri A, Gertz MA, Kumar S, Wechalekar A, Hawkins PN, et al. New criteria for response to treatment in immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis based on free light chain measurement and cardiac biomarkers: impact on survival outcomes. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:4511–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wechalekar AD, Schonland SO, Kastritis E, Gillmore JD, Dimopoulos MA, Lane T, et al. A European collaborative study of treatment outcomes in 346 patients with cardiac stage III AL amyloidosis. Blood. 2013;121:3420–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kastritis E, Dimopoulos MA. Recent advances in the management of AL amyloidosis. Br J Haematol. 2016;172:170–86.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Gertz MA. Immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis: 2014 update on diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment. Am J Hematol. 2014;89:1132–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jaccard A, Moreau P, Leblond V, Leleu X, Benboubker L, Hermine O, et al. High-dose melphalan versus melphalan plus dexamethasone for AL amyloidosis. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:1083–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. D’Souza A, Dispenzieri A, Wirk B, Zhang MJ, Huang J, Gertz MA, et al. Improved outcomes after autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation for light chain amyloidosis: a Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research Study. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:3741–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Dispenzieri A, Seenithamby K, Lacy MQ, Kumar SK, Buadi FK, Hayman SR, et al. Patients with immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation have superior outcomes compared with patients with multiple myeloma: a retrospective review from a tertiary referral center. Bone Marrow Transpl. 2013;48:1302–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Cordes S, Dispenzieri A, Lacy MQ, Hayman SR, Buadi FK, Dingli D, et al. Ten-year survival after autologous stem cell transplantation for immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis. Cancer. 2012;118:6105–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Sanchorawala V, Sun F, Quillen K, Sloan JM, Berk JL, Seldin DC. Long-term outcome of patients with AL amyloidosis treated with high-dose melphalan and stem cell transplantation: 20-year experience. Blood. 2015;126:2345–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Palladini G, Perfetti V, Obici L, Caccialanza R, Semino A, Adami F. Association of melphalan and high-dose dexamethasone is effective and well tolerated in patients with AL [primary] amyloidosis who are ineligible for stem cell transplantation. Blood. 2004;103:2936–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Palladini G, Milani P, Foli A, Obici L, Lavatelli F, Nuvolone M, et al. Oral melphalan and dexamethasone grants extended survival with minimal toxicity in AL amyloidosis: long-term results of a risk-adapted approach. Haematologica. 2014;99:743–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Dietrich S, Schönland SO, Benner A, Bochtler T, Kristen AV, Beimler J, et al. Treatment with intravenous melphalan and dexamethasone is not able to overcome the poor prognosis of patients with newly diagnosed systemic light chain amyloidosis and severe cardiac involvement. Blood. 2010;116:522–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Jelinek T, Kryukova E, Kufova Z, Kryukov F, Hajek R. Proteasome inhibitors in AL amyloidosis: focus on mechanism of action and clinical activity. Hematol Oncol. 2017;35:408–19.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Palladini G, Sachchithanantham S, Milani P, Gillmore J, Foli A, Lachmann H, et al. A European collaborative study of cyclophosphamide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone in upfront treatment of systemic AL amyloidosis. Blood. 2015;126:612–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Cole DC, Frishman WH. Cardiovascular complications of proteasome inhibitors used in multiple myeloma. Cardiol Rev. 2018;226:122–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lin G, Dispenzieri A, Kyle R, Grogan M, Brady PA. Implantable cardioverter defibrillators in patients with cardiac amyloidosis. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2013;24:793–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shin-ichi Fuchida.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fuchida, Si., Ide, D., Taminishi-Katsuragawa, Y. et al. A retrospective analysis of treatment outcomes in 45 patients with cardiac light-chain amyloidosis: a single-center experience in Japan. Int J Hematol 111, 803–811 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12185-020-02835-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12185-020-02835-8

Keywords

Navigation