Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The Role of Pacing in Elderly Patients with Unexplained Syncope

  • Arrhythmias (J. Bunch, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Cardiovascular Risk Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of Review

To discuss the role of pacing in elderly patients with unexplained syncope.

Recent Findings

In patients with recurrent syncope with suspected reflex mechanism, the decision of pacemaker implantation can be guided by a standardized algorithm which includes carotid sinus massage, tilt-table testing, and implantable loop recorder. Cardiac pacing may reduce recurrent syncope in cardioinhibitory carotid sinus syndrome. In select elderly patients with recurrent cardioinhibitory vasovagal syncope, cardiac pacing may also reduce syncope recurrence. There is no role of cardiac pacing in patients with without a cardioinhibitory response. There is increasing evidence that closed loop stimulation reduces the recurrence of cardioinhibitory vasovagal syncope. In patients with syncope and a positive electrophysiology study consistent with sinoatrial or conduction system disease, cardiac pacing has been shown to reduce recurrent syncope. Cardiac pacing is also effective in reducing recurrent syncope when high-grade atrioventricular block is documented on electrocardiography monitoring. In elderly patients with unexplained syncope and bundle branch block on ECG, diagnostic algorithm should be followed according to guidelines; empirical pacing is generally not recommended.

Summary

Permanent pacemaker implantation may be effective to reduce recurrent syncope in select groups of elderly patients. It is important to consider additional investigations to evaluate elderly patients with unexplained syncope. The results of these testing would guide the decision on permanent pacemaker implantation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. •• Shen WK, Sheldon RS, Benditt DG, et al. 2017 ACC/AHA/HRS guideline for the evaluation and management of patients with syncope: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;70:e39–e110 Guidelines for syncope by the ACC, AHA, and HRS.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Soteriades ES, Evans JC, Larson MG, Chen MH, Chen L, Benjamin EJ, et al. Incidence and prognosis of syncope. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:878–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chen LY, Gersh BJ, Hodge DO, Wieling W, Hammill SC, Shen WK. Prevalence and clinical outcomes of patients with multiple potential causes of syncope. Mayo Clin Proc. 2003;78:414–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sabharwal S, Wilson H, Reilly P, Gupte CM. Heterogeneity of the definition of elderly age in current orthopaedic research. Springerplus. 2015;4:516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ruwald MH, Hansen ML, Lamberts M, Hansen CM, Nume AK, Vinther M, et al. Comparison of incidence, predictors, and the impact of co-morbidity and polypharmacy on the risk of recurrent syncope in patients <85 versus >/=85 years of age. Am J Cardiol. 2013;112:1610–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ungar A, Mussi C, Ceccofiglio A, Bellelli G, Nicosia F, Bo M, et al. Etiology of syncope and unexplained falls in elderly adults with dementia: syncope and dementia (SYD) study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2016;64:1567–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ungar A, Galizia G, Morrione A, Mussi C, Noro G, Ghirelli L, et al. Two-year morbidity and mortality in elderly patients with syncope. Age Ageing. 2011;40:696–702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Tinetti ME, Williams CS. The effect of falls and fall injuries on functioning in community-dwelling older persons. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 1998;53:M112–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Karlsson MK, Magnusson H, von Schewelov T, Rosengren BE. Prevention of falls in the elderly--a review. Osteoporos Int. 2013;24:747–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kerr SR, Pearce MS, Brayne C, Davis RJ, Kenny RA. Carotid sinus hypersensitivity in asymptomatic older persons: implications for diagnosis of syncope and falls. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166:515–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. •• Brignole M, Moya A, de Lange FJ, et al. 2018 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of syncope. Eur Heart J. 2018;39:1883–948 Guidelines for syncope by the European Society of Cardiology.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Brignole M, Menozzi C, Lolli G, Bottoni N, Gaggioli G. Long-term outcome of paced and nonpaced patients with severe carotid sinus syndrome. Am J Cardiol. 1992;69:1039–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kenny RA, Richardson DA, Steen N, Bexton RS, Shaw FE, Bond J. Carotid sinus syndrome: a modifiable risk factor for nonaccidental falls in older adults (SAFE PACE). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;38:1491–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Claesson JE, Kristensson BE, Edvardsson N, Wahrborg P. Less syncope and milder symptoms in patients treated with pacing for induced cardioinhibitory carotid sinus syndrome: a randomized study. Europace. 2007;9:932–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Parry SW, Steen N, Bexton RS, Tynan M, Kenny RA. Pacing in elderly recurrent fallers with carotid sinus hypersensitivity: a randomised, double-blind, placebo controlled crossover trial. Heart. 2009;95:405–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ryan DJ, Nick S, Colette SM, Roseanne K. Carotid sinus syndrome, should we pace? A multicentre, randomised control trial (Safepace 2). Heart. 2010;96:347–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Flammang D, Antiel M, Church T, Chassing A, Hamani D, Donal E, et al. Is a pacemaker indicated for vasovagal patients with severe cardioinhibitory reflex as identified by the ATP test? A preliminary randomized trial. Europace. 1999;1:140–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Connolly SJ, Sheldon R, Roberts RS, Gent M. The North American Vasovagal Pacemaker Study (VPS). A randomized trial of permanent cardiac pacing for the prevention of vasovagal syncope. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999;33:16–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Sutton R, Brignole M, Menozzi C, Raviele A, Alboni P, Giani P, et al. Dual-chamber pacing in the treatment of neurally mediated tilt-positive cardioinhibitory syncope : pacemaker versus no therapy: a multicenter randomized study. The Vasovagal Syncope International Study (VASIS) Investigators. Circulation. 2000;102:294–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Ammirati F, Colivicchi F, Santini M, Syncope D, Treatment Study I. Permanent cardiac pacing versus medical treatment for the prevention of recurrent vasovagal syncope: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Circulation. 2001;104:52–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Connolly SJ, Sheldon R, Thorpe KE, Roberts RS, Ellenbogen KA, Wilkoff BL, et al. Pacemaker therapy for prevention of syncope in patients with recurrent severe vasovagal syncope: Second Vasovagal Pacemaker Study (VPS II): a randomized trial. JAMA. 2003;289:2224–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Raviele A, Giada F, Menozzi C, Speca G, Orazi S, Gasparini G, et al. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of permanent cardiac pacing for the treatment of recurrent tilt-induced vasovagal syncope. The vasovagal syncope and pacing trial (SYNPACE). Eur Heart J. 2004;25:1741–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Brignole M, Menozzi C, Moya A, Andresen D, Blanc JJ, Krahn AD, et al. Pacemaker therapy in patients with neurally mediated syncope and documented asystole: Third International Study on Syncope of Uncertain Etiology (ISSUE-3): a randomized trial. Circulation. 2012;125:2566–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Occhetta E, Bortnik M, Audoglio R, Vassanelli C, Investigators IS. Closed loop stimulation in prevention of vasovagal syncope. Inotropy Controlled Pacing in Vasovagal Syncope (INVASY): a multicentre randomized, single blind, controlled study. Europace. 2004;6:538–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Russo V, Rago A, Papa AA, Golino P, Calabro R, Russo MG, et al. The effect of dual-chamber closed-loop stimulation on syncope recurrence in healthy patients with tilt-induced vasovagal cardioinhibitory syncope: a prospective, randomised, single-blind, crossover study. Heart. 2013;99:1609–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. • Baron-Esquivias G, Morillo CA, Moya-Mitjans A, Martinez-Alday J, Ruiz-Granell R, Lacunza-Ruiz J, et al. Dual-chamber pacing with closed loop stimulation in recurrent reflex vasovagal syncope: the SPAIN study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;70:1720–8 Randomized trial showing that DDD-CLS pacing reduced syncope burden and prolonged time to first recurrence in patients age ≥40 years with head-up tilt test-induced vasovagal syncope compared with sham pacing.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. • Palmisano P, Dell’Era G, Russo V, et al. Effects of closed-loop stimulation vs. DDD pacing on haemodynamic variations and occurrence of syncope induced by head-up tilt test in older patients with refractory cardioinhibitory vasovagal syncope: the Tilt test-Induced REsponse in Closed-loop Stimulation multicentre, prospective, single blind, randomized study. Europace. 2018;20:859–66 Randomized trial showing that CLS reduces the occurrence of syncope induced by head-up tilt test in patients with cardioinhibitory vasovagal syncope, compared with DDD pacing.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Brignole M, Menozzi C. The natural history of carotid sinus syncope and the effect of cardiac pacing. Europace. 2011;13:462–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. McLeod CJ, Trusty JM, Jenkins SM, Rea RF, Cha YM, Espinosa RA, et al. Method of pacing does not affect the recurrence of syncope in carotid sinus syndrome. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2012;35:827–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Brignole M, Sutton R, Menozzi C, Garcia-Civera R, Moya A, Wieling W, et al. Early application of an implantable loop recorder allows effective specific therapy in patients with recurrent suspected neurally mediated syncope. Eur Heart J. 2006;27:1085–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Brignole M, Donateo P, Tomaino M, Massa R, Iori M, Beiras X, et al. Benefit of pacemaker therapy in patients with presumed neurally mediated syncope and documented asystole is greater when tilt test is negative: an analysis from the third International Study on Syncope of Uncertain Etiology (ISSUE-3). Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2014;7:10–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. • Brignole M, Arabia F, Ammirati F, Tomaino M, Quartieri F, Rafanelli M, et al. Standardized algorithm for cardiac pacing in older patients affected by severe unpredictable reflex syncope: 3-year insights from the Syncope Unit Project 2 (SUP 2) study. Europace. 2016;18:1427–33 Multicentre observational study assessing a standardized algorithm for selection of candidates for cardiac pacing in reflex syncope.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Brignole M, Ammirati F, Arabia F, Quartieri F, Tomaino M, Ungar A, et al. Assessment of a standardized algorithm for cardiac pacing in older patients affected by severe unpredictable reflex syncopes. Eur Heart J. 2015;36:1529–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Flammang D, Church TR, De Roy L, Blanc JJ, Leroy J, Mairesse GH, et al. Treatment of unexplained syncope: a multicenter, randomized trial of cardiac pacing guided by adenosine 5′-triphosphate testing. Circulation. 2012;125:31–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Deharo JC, Guieu R, Mechulan A, Peyrouse E, Kipson N, Ruf J, et al. Syncope without prodromes in patients with normal heart and normal electrocardiogram: a distinct entity. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62:1075–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Brignole M, Deharo JC, De Roy L, Menozzi C, Blommaert D, Dabiri L, et al. Syncope due to idiopathic paroxysmal atrioventricular block: long-term follow-up of a distinct form of atrioventricular block. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58:167–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Brignole M, Guieu R, Tomaino M, Iori M, Ungar A, Bertolone C, et al. Mechanism of syncope without prodromes with normal heart and normal electrocardiogram. Heart Rhythm. 2017;14:234–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Josephson ME, Caracta AR, Ricciutti MA, Lau SH, Damato AN. Electrophysiologic properties of procainamide in man. Am J Cardiol. 1974;33:596–603.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Englund A, Bergfeldt L, Rosenqvist M. Pharmacological stress testing of the His-Purkinje system in patients with bifascicular block. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1998;21:1979–87.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Katritsis DG, Josephson ME. Electrophysiological testing for the investigation of bradycardias. Arrhythmia Electrophysiol Rev. 2017;6:24–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Epstein AE, DiMarco JP, Ellenbogen KA, Estes NA III, Freedman RA, Gettes LS, et al. 2012 ACCF/AHA/HRS focused update incorporated into the ACCF/AHA/HRS 2008 guidelines for device-based therapy of cardiac rhythm abnormalities: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61:e6–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Moya A, Garcia-Civera R, Croci F, Menozzi C, Brugada J, Ammirati F, et al. Diagnosis, management, and outcomes of patients with syncope and bundle branch block. Eur Heart J. 2011;32:1535–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. •• Kalscheur MM, Donateo P, Wenzke KE, Aste M, Oddone D, Solano A, et al. Long-term outcome of patients with bifascicular block and unexplained syncope following cardiac pacing. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2016;39:1126–31 Recurrence of syncope in patients with bifascicular block and and unexplained syncope who received empiric pacing was 27%.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. • Giannopoulos G, Kossyvakis C, Panagopoulou V, et al. Permanent pacemaker implantation in octogenarians with unexplained syncope and positive electrophysiologic testing. Heart Rhythm. 2017;14:694–9 In elderly patients with unexplained syncope and signs of sinus node dysfunction or impaired atrioventricular conduction on invasive EP study, pacemaker was associated with longer syncope-free survival.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Barba-Pichardo R, Morina-Vazquez P, Venegas-Gamero J, Maroto-Monserrat F, Cid-Cumplido M, Herrera-Carranza M. Permanent His-bundle pacing in patients with infra-Hisian atrioventricular block. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2006;59:553–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Vijayaraman P, Naperkowski A, Ellenbogen KA, Dandamudi G. Electrophysiologic insights into site of atrioventricular block: lessons from permanent His bundle Pacing. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2015;1:571–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Santini M, Castro A, Giada F, Ricci R, Inama G, Gaggioli G, et al. Prevention of syncope through permanent cardiac pacing in patients with bifascicular block and syncope of unexplained origin: the PRESS study. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2013;6:101–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Woelfel AK, Simpson RJ Jr, Gettes LS, Foster JR. Exercise-induced distal atrioventricular block. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1983;2:578–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Byrne JM, Marais HJ, Cheek GA. Exercise-induced complete heart block in a patient with chronic bifascicular block. J Electrocardiol. 1994;27:339–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Aste M, Oddone D, Donateo P, Solano A, Maggi R, Croci F, et al. Syncope in patients paced for atrioventricular block. Europace. 2016;18:1735–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Maggi R, Rafanelli M, Ceccofiglio A, Solari D, Brignole M, Ungar A. Additional diagnostic value of implantable loop recorder in patients with initial diagnosis of real or apparent transient loss of consciousness of uncertain origin. Europace. 2014;16:1226–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Bhangu J, McMahon CG, Hall P, Bennett K, Rice C, Crean P, et al. Long-term cardiac monitoring in older adults with unexplained falls and syncope. Heart. 2016;102:681–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic Arizona, 5777 East Mayo Boulevard, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA

    Justin Z. Lee, Siva K. Mulpuru & Win K. Shen

  2. Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic Rochester, 200 1st St SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA

    Siva K. Mulpuru

Authors
  1. Justin Z. Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Siva K. Mulpuru
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Win K. Shen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Win K. Shen.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Arrhythmias

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, J.Z., Mulpuru, S.K. & Shen, W.K. The Role of Pacing in Elderly Patients with Unexplained Syncope. Curr Cardiovasc Risk Rep 13, 13 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12170-019-0608-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12170-019-0608-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation