Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Life Cycle Performance of Cellulosic Ethanol and Corn Ethanol from a Retrofitted Dry Mill Corn Ethanol Plant

  • Published:
BioEnergy Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study conducts a life cycle assessment of a simulated dry mill corn ethanol facility in California’s Central Valley retrofitted to also produce ethanol from corn stover, a cellulosic feedstock. The assessment examines three facility designs, all producing corn ethanol and wet distiller’s grains and solubles as a co-product: a baseline facility with no cellulosic retrofit, a facility retrofitted with a small capacity for stover feedstock, and a facility retrofitted for a large capacity of stover feedstock. Corn grain is supplied by rail from the Midwest, while stover is sourced from in-state farms and delivered by truck. Two stover feedstock supply scenarios are considered, testing harvest rates at 25 or 40 % of stover mass. Allocation is required to separate impacts attributable to co-products. Additional scenarios are explored to assess the effect of co-product allocation methods on life cycle assessment results for the two fuel products, corn ethanol and stover ethanol. The assessment tracks greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, energy consumption, criteria air pollutants, and direct water consumption. The GHG intensity of corn ethanol produced from the three facility designs range between 61.3 and 68.9 g CO2e/MJ, which includes 19.8 g CO2e/MJ from indirect land use change for Midwestern corn grain. The GHG intensity of cellulosic ethanol varies from 44.1 to 109.2 g CO2e/MJ, and 14.6 to 32.1 g CO2e/MJ in the low and high stover capacity cases, respectively. Total energy input ranges between 0.60 and 0.71 MJ/MJ for corn ethanol and 0.13 to 2.29 MJ/MJ for stover ethanol. This variability is the result of the stover supply scenarios (a function of harvest rate) and co-product allocation decisions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Feed grains: yearbook tables (2016) United States Department of Agriculture Economic Research Service. http://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/feed-grains-database/feed-grains-custom-query.aspx#ResultsPanel. Accessed December 16, 2015

  2. Wang M, Han J, Dunn JB, Cai H, Elgowainy A (2012) Well-to-wheels energy use and greenhouse gas emissions of ethanol from corn, sugarcane and cellulosic biomass for US use. Environ Res Lett 7(4):045905

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Looker D (2015) World’s largest cellulosic ethanol plant opens in U.S. http://www.agriculture.com/news/business/wlds-largest-cellulosic-ethol-plt-opens_5-ar51218. Accessed Dec 12 2015

  4. Morrison GM, Witcover J, Parker NC, Fulton L (2016) Three routes forward for biofuels: incremental, leapfrog, and transitional. Energ Policy 88:64–73. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2015.10.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wallace R, Ibsen K, McAloon A, Yee W (2005) Feasibility study for co-locating and integrating ethanol production plants from corn starch and lignocellulosic feedstocks (revised). National Renewable Energy Laboratory. Golden, CO, US

  6. Dias MOS, Junqueira TL, Cavalett O, Cunha MP, Jesus CDF, Rossell CEV, Maciel Filho R, Bonomi A (2012) Integrated versus stand-alone second generation ethanol production from sugarcane bagasse and trash. Bioresour Technol 103(1):152–161. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2011.09.120

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dias MOS, Junqueira TL, Cavalett O, Pavanello LG, Cunha MP, Jesus CDF, Maciel Filho R, Bonomi A (2013) Biorefineries for the production of first and second generation ethanol and electricity from sugarcane. Appl Energy 109:72–78. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.03.081

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gnansounou E, Vaskan P, Pachón ER (2015) Comparative techno-economic assessment and LCA of selected integrated sugarcane-based biorefineries. Bioresour Technol 196:364–375. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2015.07.072

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ou L, Brown TR, Thilakaratne R, Hu G, Brown RC (2014) Techno-economic analysis of co-located corn grain and corn Stover ethanol plants. Biofuels Bioprod Biorefin 8(3):412–422

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Canter C, Dunn J, Han J, Wang Z, Wang M (2015) Policy implications of allocation methods in the life cycle analysis of integrated corn and corn stover ethanol production. Bioenerg Res:1–11. doi:10.1007/s12155-015-9664-4

  11. Technical Committee ISO/TC207 (2006) ISO 14044 International standard: environmental management—life cycle assessment—principals and framework. International Organization for Standardization. Geneva

  12. Forster P, Ramaswamy V, Artaxo P, Berntsen T, Betts R, Fahey DW, Haywood J, Lean J, Lowe DC, Myhre G, Nganga J, Prinn R, Raga G, Schulz M, Dorland RV (2007) Changes in atmospheric constituents and in radiative forcing. Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Press CU, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY

  13. Murphy CW, Kendall A (2013) Life cycle inventory development for corn and stover production systems under different allocation methods. Biomass Bioenergy 58(0):67–75. doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2013.08.008

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Mobile Source Emission Inventory (2011) California Environmental Protection Agency. http://www.arb.ca.gov/msei/modeling.htm

  15. Off-Road Mobile Source Emission Inventory (2007) California Environmental Protection Agency. http://www.arb.ca.gov/msei/modeling.htm

  16. Brittan KL, Schmierer JL, Munier DJ, Klonsky KM, Livingston P (2008) Sample costs to produce field corn on mineral soils in the Sacramento Valley. University of California Cooperative Extension. Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, UC Davis

  17. Frate CA, Marsh BH, Klonsky KM, De Moura RL (2008) Sample costs to produce grain corn San Joaquin Valley-South 2008. University of California Cooperative Extension. Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, UC Davis. http://coststudies.ucdavis.edu

  18. Hess JR, Kenney KL, Ovard LP, Searcy EM, Wright CT (2009) Commodity-scale production of an infrastructure-compatible bulk solid from herbaceous lignocellulosic biomass. Idaho National Laboratory. Idaho Falls, ID. https://bioenergy.inl.gov/Reports/Uniform%20Format%20Bioenergy%20Feedstock.pdf

  19. Kendall A, Marvinney E, Brodt S, Zhu W (2015) Life cycle-based assessment of energy use and greenhouse gas emissions in almond production, part I: analytical framework and baseline results. J Ind Ecol 19(6):1008–1018

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Mitchell J, Klonsky K, Stewert D (2015) Sample costs to produce silage corn: conservation tillage practices San Joaquin Valley—North. University of California Cooperative Extension. Davis, California http://coststudyfiles.ucdavis.edu/uploads/cs_public/a9/c5/a9c55e16-83cf-46f3-86b8-436ae2deb41f/15ctsilagecornsanjoaquinvalleyfinaldraftjuly20.pdf

  21. Alexiades A (2014) Applying adaptive agricultural management & industrial ecology principles to produce lower-carbon ethanol from California energy beets. University of California Davis

  22. Long R, Leinfelder-Miles M, Putnam D, Klonsky K, Stewart D (2015) Sample costs to establish and produce alfalfa hay in the Sacramento Valley and Northern San Joaquin Valley flood irrigation University Of California Cooperative Extension Davis, California, USA. http://coststudyfiles.ucdavis.edu/uploads/cs_public/39/f2/39f29aa5-b991-4a13-816e-c695ed243249/alfalfa-flood-sv-2015.pdf

  23. Vargas RN, Frate CA, Canevari WM, Campbell-Mathews M, Klonsky KM, De Moura RL (2003) Sample costs to produce grain corn San Joaquin Valley. University of California Cooperative Extension. Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, UC Davis. http://coststudies.ucdavis.edu

  24. Brittan KL, Munier DJ, Klonsky KM, Livingston P (2004) Sample costs to produce field corn Sacramento Valley. University of California Cooperative Extension. Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, UC Davis. http://coststudies.ucdavis.edu

  25. Hutmacher RB, Wright SD, Godfrey L, Munk DS, Marsh BH, Klonsky KM, De Moura RL, Tumber KP (2012) sample costs to produce cotton—pima variety—San Joaquin Valley. UC Cooperative Extension. Davis, California, US. http://cottoninfo.ucdavis.edu/files/150403.pdf

  26. Graham RL, Nelson R, Sheehan J, Perlack R, Wright LL (2007) Current and potential US corn stover supplies. Agron J 99(1):1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Laird DA, Chang C-W (2013) Long-term impacts of residue harvesting on soil quality. Soil Tillage Res 134:33–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Moebius-Clune BN, van Es HM, Idowu OJ, Schindelbeck RR, Moebius-Clune DJ, Wolfe DW, Abawi GS, Thies JE, Gugino BK, Lucey R (2008) Long-term effects of harvesting maize stover and tillage on soil quality. Soil Sci Soc Am J 72(4):960–969

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Blanco-Canqui H, Lal R (2009) Corn stover removal for expanded uses reduces soil fertility and structural stability. Soil Sci Soc Am J 73(2):418–426

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Lugato E, Jones A (2015) Modelling soil organic carbon changes under different maize cropping scenarios for cellulosic ethanol in Europe. Bioenerg res 8 (2):537–545. doi:10.1007/s12155-014-9529-2

  31. California Corn for Grain County Estimates (2012) National Agriculture Statistics Service. http://nass.usda.gov/Statistics_by_State/California/Publications/County_Estimates/2012corngrnF.pdf

  32. Kim S, Dale BE, Jenkins R (2009) Life cycle assessment of corn grain and corn stover in the United States. Int J Life Cycle Assess 14(2):160–174

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. BNSF 6003 Rail Miles Inquiry (2013) BNSF Railway Company. http://www.bnsf.com/bnsf.was6/RailMiles/RMCentralController. 05 Accessed 2014/08

  34. Vachal K (2012) Regional elevator transportation: market decisions and rail service. Upper Great Plains Transportation Institute. North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND. http://www.ugpti.org/resources/reports/details.php?id = 732

  35. Vachal K (2015) Northern Plains Grain Farm Truck Fleet & Marketing Patterns. Upper Great Plains Transportation Institute. North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND. http://www.ugpti.org/resources/reports/details.php?id = 821#citation

  36. ISO (2006) 14040:2006. Environmental management—life cycle assessment—principles and framework. International Organization for Standardization (ISO), Geneva.

  37. Arora S, Wu M, Wang M (2010) Estimated displaced products and ratios of distillers’ co-products from corn ethanol plants and the implications of lifecycle analysis. Biofuels 1(6):911–922

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Robinson PH, Ahmadi A (2005) PCDAIRY least cost and ration analysis programs for dairy cattle vol 2005 USA. Davis, CA

  39. CDFA (2015) California dairy statistics and trends mid-year review January–June 2015 data. Dairy Marketing Branch, California Department of Food and Agriculture. Sacramento, CA. https://www.cdfa.ca.gov/dairy/pdf/Annual/2015/MidYear2015.pdf

  40. California Dairy Review Newsletters (2015) California Department of Food and Agriculture. http://www.cdfa.ca.gov/dairy/uploader/postings/dairyreview/Default.aspx. 09 Accessed 08/2015

  41. U.S. Bioenergy Statistics overview prices table 14—fuel ethanol, corn and gasoline prices, by month (2014) United States Department of Agriculture Economic Research Service. http://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/us-bioenergy-statistics.aspx#30039

  42. U.S. bioenergy statistics overview co-products table 8—dried distillers grain with solubles: supply and disappearance (2014) Economic Research Service. http://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/us-bioenergy-statistics.aspx#30039

  43. Californi Air Resources Board (2015) staff report: calculating carbon intensity values from indirect land use change of crop-based biofuels. California Environmental Protection Agency Air Resource Board. Sacramento, California. http://www.arb.ca.gov/fuels/lcfs/peerreview/050515staffreport_iluc.pdf

  44. California Air Resources Board (2015) CA-GREET model documentation. http://www.arb.ca.gov/fuels/lcfs/ca-greet/ ca-greet.htm

  45. Nebraska Department of Natural Resources (2013) Annual evaluation of availability of hydrologically connected water supplies. http://www.dnr.ne.gov/iwm/annual-report-2014-final

  46. Dunn JB, Mueller S, Wang M, Han J (2012) Energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions from enzyme and yeast manufacture for corn and cellulosic ethanol production. Biotechnol Lett 34(12):2259–2263

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. MacLean HL, Spatari S (2009) The contribution of enzymes and process chemicals to the life cycle of ethanol. Environ Res Lett 4(1):014001

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge financial support from California Energy Commission, contract grant award number ARV-11-018. We are also grateful to Lily Wachter, Tom Griffin, Richard Woods, and Cameron Cast at Edeniq, Inc. for providing valuable data and helpful discussions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California Davis, 1605 Tilia St., Davis, CA, 95616, USA

    Yizhen Zhang

  2. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California Davis, 1 Shields Avenue, Davis, CA, 95616, USA

    Alissa Kendall

Authors
  1. Yizhen Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Alissa Kendall
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alissa Kendall.

Electronic Supplementary Material

ESM 1

(DOCX 64 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, Y., Kendall, A. Life Cycle Performance of Cellulosic Ethanol and Corn Ethanol from a Retrofitted Dry Mill Corn Ethanol Plant. Bioenerg. Res. 10, 183–198 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-016-9776-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-016-9776-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation