Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Sugar Yield of Sweet Pearl Millet and Sweet Sorghum as Influenced by Harvest Dates and Delays Between Biomass Chopping and Pressing

  • Published:
BioEnergy Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sweet pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R.Br] and sweet sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] have been identified as possible ethanol feedstocks because of their high biomass yield and concentration of readily fermentable sugars, but the effects of harvest dates and delays between biomass harvest and pressing on sugar yield and concentration are poorly known. The objective of this study was to determine the effects of two species, two harvest dates (August and September), and four delays between chopping and pressing (0.5, 2, 4, and 6 h) on yields and concentrations of nonstructural carbohydrates [NSC = water-soluble carbohydrates (WSC) + starch] of the biomass, bagasse, and extracted juice. An experiment was conducted at two contrasted sites in Québec, Canada [Saint-Augustin-de-Desmaures, 2,300–2,500 corn heat units (CHU); and Sainte-Anne-de-Bellevue, 2,900–3,100 CHU], in 2010. Sweet sorghum had lower biomass yield (15.8 vs. 20.4 Mg dry matter (DM) ha−1), but greater biomass NSC concentration (242 vs. 128 g kg−1 DM), extracted juice NSC concentration (61 vs. 42 g L−1) and yield (2.8 vs. 2.2 Mg ha−1) than sweet pearl millet. Delaying harvest increased biomass yield (+7 Mg DM ha−1), NSC concentrations of biomass (+97 g kg−1 DM), bagasse (+70 g kg−1 DM), and extracted juice (+38 g L−1), and NSC yield from the extracted juice (+1.6 Mg ha−1). The maximum extracted juice NSC yield (3.9 Mg ha−1) was obtained with sweet sorghum harvested in September. Delaying pressing the biomass up to 6 h after chopping did not affect NSC concentration and yield of the extracted juice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

DM:

Dry matter

NSC:

Nonstructural carbohydrates

WSC:

Water-soluble carbohydrates

CHU:

Corn heat unit

NIRS:

Near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy

SEM:

Standard error of the mean

References

  1. Bouchard A, Vanasse A, Seguin P, Bélanger G (2011) Yield and composition of sweet pearl millet as affected by row spacing and seeding rate. Agron J 103:995–1001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Leblanc V, Vanasse A, Bélanger G, Seguin P (2012) Sweet pearl millet yields and nutritive value as influenced by fertilization and harvest dates. Agron J 104:542–9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. AERC (Agriculture Environmental Renewal Canada) (2007) Canadian sweet sorghum hybrid (CSSH 45). http://www.aerc.ca/CSSH45Englishmarch182007.doc. Accessed 25 March 2014

  4. Andrews DJ, Kumar KA (1992) Pearl millet for food, feed, and forage. Adv Agron 48:89–139

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. AERC (Agriculture Environmental Renewal Canada) (2008) Canadian forage pearl millet-101. http://www.aerc.ca/millet_perle_grain_francais.doc. Accessed 25 March 2014

  6. Ball-Coelho B, Bruin AJ, Roy RC, Riga E (2003) Forage pearl millet and marigold as rotation crops for biological control of root-lesion nematodes in potato. Agron J 95:282–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bélair G, Dauphinais N, Fournier Y, Dangi OP, Clément MF (2005) Effect of forage and grain pearl millet on Pratylenchus penetrans and potato yields in Quebec. J Nematol 37:78–82

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bélair G, Dauphinais N, Fournier Y, Dangi OP, Ciotola M (2006) Effect of 3-year rotation sequences and pearl millet on population densities of Pratylenchus penetrans and subsequent potato yield. Can. J. Plant Pathol 28:230–5

    Google Scholar 

  9. Zhao YL, Dolat A, Steinberger Y, Wang X, Osman A, Xie GH (2009) Biomass yield and changes in chemical composition of sweet sorghum cultivars grown for biofuel. Field Crops Res 111:55–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wu X, Staggenborg S, Propheter JL, Rooney WL, Yu J, Wang D (2010) Features of sweet sorghum juice and their performance in ethanol fermentation. Ind Crops Prod 31:164–70

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Chamberland E (1976) Establishment trials of sweet sorghum in Québec. Nat Can 103:543–51

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hunter EL (1994) Development, sugar yield, and ethanol potential of sweet sorghum Iowa State University. Thesis. Ames. IA. pp 152

  13. Hassanat F, Mustafa AF, Seguin P (2006) Chemical composition and ensiling characteristics of normal and brown midrib pearl millet harvested at two stages of development in southwestern Québec. Can J Anim Sci 86:71–80

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Bennett AS, Anex RP (2009) Production, transportation and milling costs of sweet sorghum as a feedstock for centralized bioethanol production in the upper Midwest. Bioresour Technol 100:1595–607

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Burcer AM, DelRosario RA, Guevarra MM, Quilloy OT (2004) Evaluation of different harvesting and post-harvest approaches on sugarcane. Annual Report, Sugar Regulatory Administration Philippines

    Google Scholar 

  16. Solomon S, Singh P, Shrivastava AK, Chandra A, Jain R, Prajapati CP (2011) Physico-chemical method of preserving sucrose in harvested sugarcane at high ambient temperature in a sub-tropical climate. Sugar Tech 13:60–7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Brown DM, Bootsma A (1993) Crop heat units for corn and other warm season crops in Ontario. Factsheet, Agdex. 111/31. Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food, and Rural Affairs, Queen’s Park, ON, Canada.

  18. Centre de Référence en Agriculture et Agroalimentaire du Québec (CRAAQ) (2003) Guide de Référence en Fertilisation. 1st ed. pp. 294

  19. Pelletier S, Tremblay GF, Bertrand A, Bélanger G, Castonguay Y, Michaud R (2010) Drying procedures affect non-structural carbohydrates and other nutritive value attributes in forage samples. Anim Feed Sci Technol 157:139–50

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Suzuki M (1971) Semi-automatic analysis of the total available carbohydrates in alfalfa roots. Can J Plant Sci 51:184–5

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Blakeney AB, Mutton LL (1980) A simple colorimetric method for the determination of sugars in fruit and vegetables. J Sci Food Agric 31:889–97

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. SAS Institute (2003) Inc., SAS/STAT user’s guide. V.9.1.3 SAS Inst., Cary, NC

  23. Amer S, Hassanat R, Berthiaume R, Seguin P, Mustafa AF (2012) Effects of water soluble carbohydrate content on ensiling characteristics, chemical composition and in vitro gas production of forage millet and forage sorghum silages. Anim Feed Sci Technol 177:23–9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Murray SC, Sharma A, Rooney WL, Klein PE, Mullet JE, Mitchell SE et al. (2008) Genetic improvement of sorghum as a biofuel feedstock: I. QTL for stem sugar and grain nonstructural carbohydrates. Crop Sci 48:2165–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lingle SE, Tew TL, Rukavina H, Boykin DL (2012) Post-harvest changes in sweet sorghum I: Brix and Sugars. Bioenergy Res 5:158–67

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Broadhead DM (1972) Effects of stalk chopping on leaf removal and juice quality of Rio sweet sorghum. Agron J 64:306–08

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Soileau JM, Bradford BN (1985) Biomass and sugar yield response of sweet sorghum to lime and fertilizer. Agron J 77:471–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Dalvi US, Chavan UD, Shinde MS, Gadakh SR (2011) Assessment of sweet sorghum cultivars for efficient ethanol production. Sugar Tech 13:186–90

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Houx JH, Craig AR, Fritschi FB (2013) Evaluation of sweet sorghum bagasse as an alternative livestock feed. Crop Sci 53:1784–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Mario Laterrière for the technical assistance and AERC Inc. for the technical support. This study was funded by Ministère de l’Agriculture, des Pêcheries et de l’Alimentation du Québec (MAPAQ). We are grateful to the support from Valérie Bélanger, Olivier Lalonde, Marianne Crépeau, Francis Gagnon, and Mike Lewis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Département de Phytologie, Université Laval, Québec, QC, G1V 0A6, Canada

    Amélia dos Passos Bernardes, Annie Brégard & Anne Vanasse

  2. Soils and Crops Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, 2560 Hochelaga Boulevard, Québec, QC, G1V 2 J3, Canada

    Gaëtan F. Tremblay & Gilles Bélanger

  3. McGill University Macdonald Campus, 21111 Lakeshore Road, Sainte-Anne-de-Bellevue, QC, H9X 3 V9, Canada

    Philippe Seguin

Authors
  1. Amélia dos Passos Bernardes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gaëtan F. Tremblay
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Gilles Bélanger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Annie Brégard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Philippe Seguin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Anne Vanasse
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anne Vanasse.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

dos Passos Bernardes, A., Tremblay, G.F., Bélanger, G. et al. Sugar Yield of Sweet Pearl Millet and Sweet Sorghum as Influenced by Harvest Dates and Delays Between Biomass Chopping and Pressing. Bioenerg. Res. 8, 100–108 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-014-9504-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-014-9504-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation