Skip to main content
Log in

The physical influence of inositides—a disproportionate effect?

  • Opinion Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Chemical Biology

Abstract

After the initial observation that lipids form a considerable part of biological membranes, the details of the physical role of lipids in biological systems have emerged gradually. There have been few ‘Eureka’ moments in which a class or individual lipid has appeared as a game-changing physical player. However, evidence collected in the last five years suggests that that notion may be about to change. In chemical biology studies, inositides are increasingly showing themselves to be lipids that have a physical influence on membrane systems that is as strong as their biological (signalling) one. Additionally, recent evidence has shown that the concentration of at least one inositide changes during important stages of the cell cycle, and not in a manner consistent with its traditional signalling roles. The balance between these data is explored and a forward-looking view is proposed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Berridge MJ (1987) Annu Rev Biochem 56:159–193

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Wenk MR, Lucast L, Di Paolo G, Romanelli AJ, Suchy SF, Nussbaum RL, Cline GW, Shulman GI, McMurray W, De Camilli P (2003) Nat Biotechnol 21:813–817

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Sekar MC, Hokin LE (1986) J Membr Biol 89:193–210

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Haylock-Jacobs S, Comerford I, Bunting M, Kara E, Townley S, Klingler-Hoffmann M, Vanhaesebroeck B, Puri KD, McColl SR (2011) J Autoimmun 36:278–287

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Moir LM, Trian T, Ge Q, Shepherd PR, Burgess JK, Oliver BGG, Black JL (2011) J Pharmacol Exp Ther 337:557–566

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Law AJ, Wang Y, Sei Y, O’Donnell P, Piantadosi P, Papaleo F, Straub RE, Huang W, Thomas CJ, Vakkalanka R, Besterman AD, Lipska BK, Hyde TM, Harrison PJ, Kleinman JE, Weinberger DR (2012) Proc Natl Acad Sci 109:12165–12170

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Fransson S, Uv A, Eriksson H, Andersson MK, Wettergren Y, Bergo M, Ejeskar K (2012) Oncogene 31:3277–3286

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Vanhaesebroeck B, Welham MJ, Kotani K, Stein R, Warne PH, Zvelebil MJ, Higashi K, Volinia S, Downward J, Waterfield MD (1997) Proc Natl Acad Sci 94:4330–4335

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hardie RC, Raghu P, Moore S, Juusola M, Baines RA, Sweeney ST (2001) Neuron 30:149–159

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhao Y, Yan A, Feijó JA, Furutani M, Takenawa T, Hwang I, Fu Y, Yang Z (2010) Plant Cell Online 22:4031–4044

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. DeCamilli P, Emr SD, McPherson PS, Novick P (1996) Science 271:1533–1539

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Wenk MR, De Camilli P (2004) Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101:8262–8269

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Milosevic I, Giovedi S, Lou X, Raimondi A, Collesi C, Shen H, Paradise S, O’Toole E, Ferguson S, Cremona O, De Camilli P (2011) Neuron 72:587–601

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Zoncu R, Perera RM, Sebastian R, Nakatsu F, Chen H, Balla T, Ayala G, Toomre D, De Camilli PV (2007) Proc Natl Acad Sci 104:3793–3798

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Di Paolo G, De Camilli P (2006) Nature 443:651–657

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Dumas F, Byrne RD, Vincent B, Hobday TMC, Poccia DL, Larijani B (2010) PLoS ONE 5:e12208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhao Y, Yan A, Feijo JA, Furutani M, Takenawa T, Hwang I, Fu Y, Yang ZB (2010) Plant Cell 22:4031–4044

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Furse S, Brooks NJ, Tate EW, Seddon AM, Woscholski R, Templer RH, Gaffney PRJ, Ces O (2012) Soft Matter 8:3090–3093

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Sewell GW, Hannun YA, Han X, Koster G, Bielawski J, Goss V, Smith PJ, Rahman FZ, Vega R, Bloom SL, Walker AP, Postle AD, Segal AW (2012) Int J Biochem Cell Biol 44:1839–1846

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Mulet X, Templer RH, Woscholski R, Ces O (2008) Langmuir 24:8443–8447

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Delacroix H, GulikKrzywicki T, Seddon JM (1996) J Mol Biol 258:88–103

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Seddon JM, Zeb N, Templer RH, McElhaney RN, Mannock DA (1996) Langmuir 12:5250–5253

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Larijani B, Dufourc EJ (2006) Lipids 41:925–932

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Atilla-Gokcumen GE, Muro E, Relat-Goberna J, Sasse S, Bedigian A, Coughlin ML, Garcia-Manyes S, Eggert US (2014) Cell 156:428–439

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Furse S, Liddell S, Ortori CA, Williams H, Neylon DC, Scott DJ, Barrett DA, Gray DA (2013) J Chem Biol 6:63–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Domart M-C, Hobday TMC, Peddie CJ, Chung GHC, Wang A, Yeh K, Jethwa N, Zhang Q, Wakelam MJO, Woscholski R, Byrne RD, Collinson LM, Poccia DL, Larijani B (2012) PLoS ONE 7:e51150

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Byrne RD, Applebee C, Poccia DL, Larijani B (2012) PLoS ONE 7:e40669

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Laganowsky A, Reading E, Allison TM, Ulmschneider MB, Degiacomi MT, Baldwin AJ, Robinson CV (2014) Nature 510:172–175

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Samuel Furse.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Furse, S. The physical influence of inositides—a disproportionate effect?. J Chem Biol 8, 1–3 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12154-014-0117-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12154-014-0117-x

Keywords

Navigation