Abstract
Hill coefficients (n H) derived from four parameter logistic fits to dose–response curves were compared to calculated realistic reaction schemes and related to experimental data: (1) Hill coefficients may give information on the number of interacting sites but cannot distinguish between competitive, non-competitive or ortho-, iso-, or allosteric mechanisms. (2) For enzymatic dose–inhibition curves, Hill coefficients smaller than one do not indicate anticooperative binding but show that at least one ternary complex has enzymatic activity. (3) Hill coefficients different from one are proof for multiple ligand binding. The large variations of reported Hill coefficients corresponds to multiple allosteric binding, where induced conformational changes cause loss of the active conformation. Such a denaturation mechanism is in stark contrast to the desired specificity of drugs. The discussion is open.





Similar content being viewed by others
References
Inglese J, Auld DS, Jadhav A, Johnson RL, Simeonov A, Yasgar A, Zheng W, Austin CP (2006) Quantitative high-throughput screening: a titration-based approach that efficiently identifies biological activities in large chemical libraries. PNAS 103:11473–11478
Guidelines for standardized dose–response curves. http://www.ncgc.nih.gov/guidance/manual_toc.html
Hill AV (1910) The possible effects of the aggregation of the molecules of haemoglobin on its dissociation curves. J Physiol (Lond.) 40:iv–vii
Langley JN (1905) On the reaction of cells and of nerve-endings to certain poisons, chiefly as regards the reaction of striated muscle to nicotine and to curare. J Physiol 33:374–413
Weiss JN (1997) The Hill equation revisited: uses and misuses. FASEB J 11:835–841
Prinz H, Schönichen A (2008) Transient binding patches: a plausible concept for drug binding. J Chem Biol 1:95–104
Monod J, Wyman J, Changeux J–P (1965) On the nature of allosteric transitions: a plausible model. J Mol Biol 12:88–118
Schirmer T, Evans PR (1990) Structural basis of the allosteric behaviour of phosphofructokinase. Nature 343:140–145
Fenton AW (2008) Allostery: an illustrated definition for the ‘second secret of life’. Trends Biochem Sci 33:420–425
May LT, Leach K, Sexton PM, Christopoulos A (2007) Allosteric modulation of G protein-coupled receptors. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 47:1–51
Swain JF, Gierasch LM (2006) The changing landscape of protein allostery. Curr Opin Struck Biol 16:102–108
Gunasekaran K, Ma B, Nussinov R (2004) Is allostery an intrinsic property of All dynamic proteins? Proteins 57:433–443
Prinz H, Maelicke A (1983) Interaction of cholinergic ligands with the purified acetylcholine receptor protein. I. Equilibrium binding studies. J Biol Chem 258:10263–10271
Koshland DE (1958) Application of a theory of enzyme specificity to protein synthesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci 44(2):98–104
NIH Data base. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez (search PubChem BioAssay)
Li Wand Lee VM (2006) Characterization of two VQIXXK motifs for tau fibrillization in vitro. Biochemistry 45:15692–15701
Kimmel JL, Reinhart GD (2000) Reevaluation of the accepted allosteric mechanism of phosphofructokinase from Bacillus stearothermophilus. PNAS 97:3844–3849
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Prinz, H. Hill coefficients, dose–response curves and allosteric mechanisms. J Chem Biol 3, 37–44 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12154-009-0029-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12154-009-0029-3