Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Three-dimensional SPECT reconstruction with transmission-dependent scatter correction

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Annals of Nuclear Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

The quality of single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging is hampered by attenuation, collimator blurring, and scatter. Correction for all of these three factors is required for accurate reconstruction, but unfortunately, reconstruction-based compensation often leads to clinically unacceptable long reconstruction times. Especially, efficient scatter correction has proved to be difficult to achieve. The objective of this article was to extend the well-known transmission-dependent convolution subtraction (TDCS) scatter-correction approach into a rapid reconstruction-based scatter-compensation method and to include it into a fast 3D reconstruction algorithm with attenuation and collimator-blurring corrections.

Methods

Ordered subsets expectation maximization algorithm with attenuation, collimator blurring, and accelerated transmission-dependent scatter compensation were implemented. The new reconstruction method was compared with TDCS-based scatter correction and with one other transmission-dependent scatter-correction method using Monte Carlo simulated projection data of 99mTc-ECD and 123I-FP-CIT brain studies.

Results

The new reconstruction-based scatter compensation outperformed the other two scatter-correction methods in terms of quantitative accuracy and contrast measured with normalized mean-squared error, gray-to-white matter and striatum-to-background ratios, and also in visual quality. Highest accuracy was achieved when all the corrections (i.e., attenuation, collimator blurring, and scatter) were applied.

Conclusions

The developed 3D reconstruction algorithm with transmission-dependent scatter compensation is a promising alternative to accurate and efficient SPECT reconstruction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Buvat I, Rodriguez-Villafuerte M, Todd-Pokropek A, Benali H, Di Paola R. Comparative assessment of nine scatter correction methods based on spectral analysis using Monte Carlo simulations. J Nucl Med 1995;36:1476–1488.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Frey EC, Tsui BMW, Ljungberg M. A comparison of scatter compensation methods in SPECT: subtraction-based techniques versus iterative reconstruction with accurate modeling of the scatter response. Conference Record of the 1992 Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference 1992;2:1035–1037.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Beekman FJ, Kamphuis C, Frey EC. Scatter compensation methods in 3D iterative reconstruction: a simulation study. Phys Med Biol 1997;42:1619–1632.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Meikle SR, Hutton BF, Bailey DL. A transmission-dependent method for scatter correction in SPECT. J Nucl Med 1994;35:360–367.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Iida H, Narita Y, Kado H, Kashikura A, Sugawara S, Shoji Y, et al. Effects of scatter and attenuation correction on quantitative assessment of regional cerebral blood flow with SPECT. J Nucl Med 1998;39:181–189.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kim KM, Varrone A, Watabe H, Shidahara M, Fujita M, Innis RB, et al. Contribution of scatter and attenuation compensation to SPECT images of nonuniformly distributed brain activities. J Nucl Med 2003;44:512–519.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hutton BF, Osiecki A, Meikle SR. Transmission-based scatter correction of 180° myocardial single-photon emission tomographic studies. Eur J Nucl Med 1996;23:1300–1308.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hutton BF, Baccarne V. Efficient scatter modelling for incorporation in maximum likelihood reconstruction. Eur J Nucl Med 1998;25:1658–1665.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bowsher JE, Floyd CE. Treatment of Compton scattering in maximum-likelihood expectation maximization reconstructions of SPECT images. J Nucl Med 1991;32:1285–1291.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hudson HM, Larkin RS. Accelerated image reconstruction using ordered subsets of projection data. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1994;13:601–609.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Zeng GL, Gullberg GT. Frequency domain implementation of the three-dimensional geometric point response correction in SPECT imaging. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 1992;39:1444–1453.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Zeng GL, Gullberg GT, Bai C, Christian PE, Trisjono F, Di Bella EVR, et al. Iterative reconstruction of fluorine-18 SPECT using geometric point response correction. J Nucl Med 1998;39:124–130.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kadrmas DJ, Frey EC, Karimi SS, Tsui BMW. Fast implementations of reconstruction-based scatter compensation in fully 3D SPECT image reconstruction. Phys Med Biol 1998;43:857–873.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ljungberg M, Strand SE. A Monte Carlo program for the simulation of scintillation camera characteristics. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 1989;29:257–272.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Zubal IG, Harrell CR, Smith EO, Rattner Z, Gindi G, Hoffer PB. Computerized three-dimensional segmented human anatomy. Med Phys 1994;21:299–302.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kim KM, Watabe H, Shidahara M, Ishida Y, Iida H. SPECT collimator dependency of scatter and validation of transmission-dependent scatter compensation methodologies. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 2001;48:689–696.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Di Bella EVR, Barclay AB, Eisner RL, Schafer RW. A comparison of rotation-based methods for iterative reconstruction algorithms. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 1996;43:3370–3376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Beekman FJ, de Jong HW, van Geloven S. Efficient fully 3-D iterative SPECT reconstruction with Monte Carlo-based scatter compensation. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2002;21:867–877.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Frey EC, Ju ZW, Tsui BMW. A fast projector-backprojector pair modeling the asymmetric, spatially varying scatter response function for scatter compensation in SPECT imaging. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 1993;40:1192–1197.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hidehiro Iida.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sohlberg, A., Watabe, H. & Iida, H. Three-dimensional SPECT reconstruction with transmission-dependent scatter correction. Ann Nucl Med 22, 549–556 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-008-0170-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-008-0170-z

Keywords

Navigation