Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A comparison of buying disorder to addictive and obsessive–compulsive disorders on impulsivity, compulsivity, and reward processing: A narrative review

  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although Buying Disorder (BD) is not a formal diagnosis in commonly used diagnostic systems, this condition can cause significant impairments. Additionally, there is an ongoing discussion about the most appropriate conceptualization and classification of BD. Most often, BD is considered either an obsessive–compulsive and related disorder (OCRD) or an addictive behavior (i.e., substance use disorders or behavioral addictions), and was previously recognized as an impulse control disorder. The present narrative review examines the cognitive processes of impulsivity (i.e., impulsive action, impulsive choice, decision making, and personality), compulsivity, and reward processing (i.e., cue reactivity and craving), in BD, obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD), and addictive behaviors. Most evidence supports BD having overlapping features with behavioral addictions more so than with OCD due to similar impairments in decision-making and inhibition, as well as similar motivations behind BD. Further, BD demonstrates cue-reactivity and craving similar to behavioral addictions. There were also similar elevations on personality inventories between BD and addictive behaviors, which were less relevant in OCD. Although studies in these specific cognitive domains suggest similarities between BD and behavioral addiction, more studies are needed to further elucidate BD processes, which would in turn assist with the classification of BD. Further, despite similarities across conditions, directly comparing BD to these conditions on the aforementioned processes is needed. In future, study designs should directly compare BD to disorders within each classification to elucidate shared and distinct functions of these processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Study concept and design: VM; HSK; MMA.

Analysis and interpretation of data: VM; HSK; MMA

Writing original manuscript: VM

Editing Manuscript: HSK; MMA; VM

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vanessa Montemarano.

Ethics declarations

Review paper. No participant recruitment or participation.

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 24 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Montemarano, V., Kim, H.S. & Antony, M.M. A comparison of buying disorder to addictive and obsessive–compulsive disorders on impulsivity, compulsivity, and reward processing: A narrative review. Curr Psychol 43, 9336–9354 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-05040-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-05040-y

Keywords

Navigation