Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Validation of an abridged, 60-item form, of the Junior Spanish NEO inventory (JS NEO-A60)

  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study was to develop a 60-item, abridged form of the Junior Spanish version of the NEO-PI-R (JS NEO-A60), consisting of 12 items per dimension. A sample of 399 high school students completed two personality scales to examine the factor structure (Exploratory Structural Equation Model), reliability and convergent validity of the JS NEO-A60. Our sample also completed several consequential life outcome measures in order to examine criterion validity. The five-factor structure, along with representation of the majority of lower-order facets, was satisfactorily covered by the JS NEO-A60. Sources of reliability (internal consistency and test-retest) and validity (convergent) were adequate. The life outcome variables revealed links to personality traits in the expected direction. Namely, internalizing emotional symptoms (anxiety and depression) were mainly predicted by emotional instability. Symptoms of behavioral problems (aggression and antisocial behavior) were predicted by low scores in both agreeableness and conscientiousness. Life satisfaction was significantly predicted by emotional stability. Last, academic performance via students’ grades was predicted by conscientiousness and openness. We conclude that the JS NEO-A60 is a sound inventory to assess the five broad personality domains in Spanish-speaking adolescents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allik, J., Laidra, K., Realo, A., & Pullmann, H. (2004). Personality development from 12 to 18 years of age: Changes in mean levels and structures of traits. European Journal of Personality, 18, 445–462. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandes, C. M., Herzhoff, K., Smack, A. J., & Tackett, J. L. (2019). The p factor and the n factor: Associations between the general factors of psychopathology and neuroticism in children. Clinical Psychological Science, 7, 1266–1284. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702619859332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandt, N. D., Becker, M., Tetzner, J., Brunner, M., Kuhl, P., & Maaz, K. (2020). Personality across the lifespan. Exploring measurement invariance of a short big five inventory from ages 11 to 84. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 36, 162–173. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caspi, A., Houts, R. M., Belsky, D. W., Goldman-Mellor, S. J., Harrington, H., Israel, S., Meier, M. H., Ramrakha, S., Shalev, I., Poulton, R., & Moffitt, T. E. (2014). The p factor: One general psychopathology factor in the structure of psychiatric disorders? Clinical Psychological Science, 2, 119–137. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702613497473.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO five-factor inventory (NEO-FFI): Professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc..

    Google Scholar 

  • Damian, R. I., Spengler, M., Sutu, A., & Roberts, B. W. (2019). Sixteen going on sixty-six: A longitudinal study of personality stability and change across 50 years. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 117, 674–695. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000210.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • De Pauw. (2016). Childhood personality and temperament. In T. A. Widiger (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of the five factor model (pp. 243–280). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199352487.013.21.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Etkin, P., Mezquita, L., López-Fernández, F. J., Ortet, G., & Ibáñez, M. I. (2020). Five factor model of personality and structure of psychopathological symptoms in adolescents. Personality and Individual Differences, 163, 110063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110063.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galindez, E., & Casas, F. (2010). Adaptación y validación de la Student’s Life Satisfaction Scale (SLSS) con adolescentes [Adaptation and validation of the students’ life satisfaction scale (SLSS) with adolescents]. Estudios de Psicología, 31, 79–87. https://doi.org/10.1174/021093910790744617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, L. R. (1992). The development of markers for the big-five factor structure. Psychological Assessment, 4, 26–42. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.4.1.26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoekstra, H. A., & De Fruyt, F. (2014). Dutch manual of the NEO-PI-3 and NEO-FFI-3 questionnaires. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Hogrefe Uitgevers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huebner, E. S., Laughlin, J. E., Ash, C., & Gilman, R. (1998). Further validation of the multidimensional students’ life satisfaction scale. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 16, 118–134. https://doi.org/10.1177/073428299801600202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ibáñez, M. I., Camacho, L., Mezquita, L., Villa, H., Moya-Higueras, J., & Ortet, G. (2015). Alcohol expectancies mediate and moderate the associations between big five personality traits and adolescent alcohol consumption and alcohol-related problems. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1838. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01838.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ibáñez, M. I., Viruela, A. M., Mezquita, L., Moya, J., Villa, H., et al. (2016). An investigation of five types of personality trait continuity: A two-wave longitudinal study of Spanish adolescents from age 12 to age 15. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 512. https://doi.org/10.3339/fpsyg.2016.00512.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • John, O. P., Naumann, L. P., & Soto, C. J. (2008). Paradigm shift to the integrative big-five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and conceptual issues. In O. P. John, R. W. Robins, & L. A. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 114–158). New York, NY: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, S. E., Miller, J. D., & Lynam, D. R. (2011). Personality, antisocial behavior, and aggression: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Criminal Justice, 39, 329–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2011.03.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kandler, C., & Papendick, M. (2017). Behavior genetics and personality development: A methodological and meta-analytic review. In J. Specht (Ed.), Personality development across the lifespan (pp. 473–495). London, UK: Elsevier Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-804674-6.00029-6.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Khazanov, G. K., & Ruscio, A. M. (2016). Is low positive emotionality a specific risk factor for depression? A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 142, 991–1015. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000059.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kotov, R., Gamez, W., Schmidt, F., & Watson, D. (2010). Linking “big” personality traits to anxiety, depressive, and substance use disorders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 768–821. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020327.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kotov, R., Krueger, R. F., Watson, D., Achenbach, T. M., Althoff, R. R., Bagby, R. M., Brown, T. A., Carpenter, W. T., Caspi, A., Clark, L. A., Eaton, N. R., Forbes, M. K., Forbush, K. T., Goldberg, D., Hasin, D., Hyman, S. E., Ivanova, M. Y., Lynam, D. R., Markon, K., Miller, J. D., Moffitt, T. E., Morey, L. C., Mullins-Sweatt, S. N., Ormel, J., Patrick, C. J., Regier, D. A., Rescorla, L., Ruggero, C. J., Samuel, D. B., Sellbom, M., Simms, L. J., Skodol, A. E., Slade, T., South, S. C., Tackett, J. L., Waldman, I. D., Waszczuk, M. A., Widiger, T. A., Wright, A. G. C., & Zimmerman, M. (2017). The hierarchical taxonomy of psychopathology (HiTOP): A dimensional alternative to traditional nosologies. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 126, 454–477. https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000258.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lensvelt-Mulders, G., & Hettema, J. (2001). Analysis of genetic influences on the consistency and variability of the big five across different stressful situations. European Journal of Personality, 15, 355–371. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lounsbury, J. W., Tatum, H., Gibson, L. W., Park, S. H., Sundstrom, E. D., Hamrick, F. L., & Wilburn, D. (2003). The development of a big five adolescent personality inventory. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 21, 111–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/073428290302100201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mann, F. D., Patterson, M. W., Grotzinger, A. D., Kretsch, N., Tackett, J. L., Tucker-Drob, E. M., & Harden, K. P. (2016). Sensation seeking, peer deviance, and genetic influences on adolescent delinquency: Evidence for person-environment correlation and interaction. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 125, 679–691. https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000160.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H. W., Martin, A. J., & Jackson, S. A. (2010). Introducing a short version of the physical self description questionnaire: New strategies, short-form evaluative criteria, and applications of factor analyses. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 32, 438–482. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.32.4.438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (2007). Brief versions of the NEO-PI-3. Journal of Individual Differences, 28, 116–128. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001.28.3.116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (2010). NEO inventories for the NEO personality inventory–3 (NEO–PI–3), NEO five-factor inventory–3 (NEO–FFI–3), NEO personality inventory-revised (NEO-PI-R): Professional manual. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mervielde, I., & De Fruyt, F. (1999). Construction of the hierarchical personality inventory for children (HiPIC). In I. J. Deary, F. De Fruyt, & F. Ostendorf (Eds.), Personality psychology in Europe (Vol. 7, pp. 107–127). Tilburg, Netherlands: Tilburg University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mervielde, I., Buyst, V., & De Fruyt, F. (1995). The validity of the big-five as a model for teachers’ ratings of individual differences among children aged 4-12 years. Personality and Individual Differences, 18, 525–534. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(94)00175-R.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mezquita, L., Ibáñez, M. I., Villa, H., Fañanás, L., Moya-Higueras, J., & Ortet, G. (2015). Five-factor model and internalizing and externalizing syndromes: A 5-year prospective study. Personality and Individual Differences, 79, 98–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.02.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morizot, J. (2014). Construct validity of adolescents’ self- reported big five personality traits: Importance of conceptual breadth and initial validation of a short measure. Assessment, 21, 580–606. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191114524015.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moya-Higueras J., Cuevas A., Marques-Feixa L., Mezquita, L., Mayoral, M., … & Ibáñez, M. (2018). Recent stressful life events (SLE) and adolescent mental health: Initial validation of the LEIA, a new checklist for SLE assessment according to their severity, interpersonal, and dependent nature. Assessment. Advance online publication. 1073191118817648.

  • Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2017). Mplus user’s guide (8th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oltmanns, J. R., Smith, G. T., Oltmanns, T. F., & Widiger, T. A. (2018). General factors of psychopathology, personality, and personality disorder: Across domain comparisons. Clinical Psychological Science, 6, 581–589. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702617750150.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ortet, G., Escrivá, P., Ibáñez, M. I., Moya, J., Villa, H., et al. (2010). Versión corta de la adaptación española para adolescentes del NEO-PI-R (JS NEO-S) [The short version of the Junior Spanish NEO-PI-R (JS NEO-S)]. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 10, 327–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortet, G., Ibáñez, M. I., Moya, J., Villa, H., Viruela, A., & Mezquita, L. (2012). Assessing the five factors of personality in adolescents: The junior version of the Spanish NEO-PI-R. Assessment, 19, 114–130. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191111410166.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ortet, G., Martínez, T., Mezquita, L., Morizot, J., & Ibáñez, M. I. (2017). Big five personality trait short questionnaire: Preliminary validation with Spanish adults. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 20, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1017/sjp.2017.8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poropat, A. E. (2014). A meta-analysis of adult-rated child personality and academic performance in primary education. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 239–252. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12019.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, M., Abraham, C., & Bond, R. (2012). Psychological correlates of university students' academic performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 138, 353–387. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026838.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, M. E., & Glendon, I. (2018). Development and initial validation of the five-factor model adolescent personality questionnaire (FFM-APQ). Journal of Personality Assessment, 100, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2017.1303776.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez-Sánchez, F., Fernández-Pinto, I., Santamaría, P., Carrasco, M., & del Barrio, V. (2016). SENA, Sistema de Evaluación de Niños y Adolescentes: proceso de desarrollo y evidencias de fiabilidad y validez. Revista de Psicología Clínica con Niños y Adolescentes, 3, 23–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soto, C. J. (2019). How replicable are links between personality traits and consequential life outcomes? The life outcomes of personality replication project. Psychological Science, 30, 711–727. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797619831612.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Soto, C. J., & John, O. P. (2017). The next big five inventory (BFI-2): Developing and assessing a hierarchical model with 15 facets to enhance bandwidth, fidelity, and predictive power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113, 117–143. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000096.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Soto, C. J., & Tackett, J. L. (2015). Personality traits in childhood and adolescence: Structure, development, and outcomes. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24, 358–362. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721415589345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soto, C. J., John, O. P., Gosling, S. D., & Potter, J. (2008). The developmental psychometrics of big-five self-reports: Acquiescence, factor structure, coherence, and differentiation from ages 10 to 20. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 718–737. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.94.4.718.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stautz, K., & Cooper, A. (2013). Impulsivity-related personality traits and adolescent alcohol use: A meta-analytic review. Clinical Psychology Review, 33, 574–592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2013.03.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Steel, P., Schmidt, J., Bosco, F., & Uggerslev, K. (2019). The effects of personality on job satisfaction and life satisfaction: A meta-analytic investigation accounting for bandwidth-fidelity and commensurability. Human Relations, 72, 217–247. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726718771465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suldo, S. M., Minch, D. R., & Hearon, B. V. (2015). Adolescent life satisfaction and personality characteristics: Investigating relationships using a five factor model. Journal of Happiness Studies, 16, 965–983. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-014-9544-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tackett, J. L., Slobodskaya, H. R., Mar, R. A., Deal, J., Halverson, C. F., Baker, S. R., et al. (2012). The hierarchical structure of childhood personality in five countries: Continuity from early childhood to early adolescence. Journal of Personality, 80, 847–879. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2011.00748.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vedel, A. (2014). The big five and tertiary academic performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 71, 66–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.07.011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vollrath, M. E., Hampson, S. E., & Torgersen, S. (2016). Constructing a short form of the hierarchical personality inventory for children (HiPIC): The HiPIC-30. Personality and Mental Health, 10, 152–165. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmh.1334.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M., & Huebner, E. S. (2015). Early adolescents’ personality and life satisfaction: A closer look at global vs. domain-specific satisfaction. Personality and Individual Differences, 83, 31–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.03.042.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Widiger, T. A., Selbom, M., Chmielewski, M., Clark, L. A., DeYoung, C. G., Kotov, R., et al. (2019). Personality in a hierarchical model of psychopathology. Clinical Psychological Science, 7, 77–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702618797105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank the students, parents, and the teachers of the high schools El Caminàs and Bovalar for making this study possible.

Availability of Data and Material

Data are openly available in https://osf.io/safn4/

Code Availability

Code with ESEM analysis is openly available in https://osf.io/g6r2s/

Funding

This research was funded, in part, by grants RTI2018–099800-B-I00 from the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities (MICIU/FEDER), AICO/2019/197 from the Generalitat Valenciana), UJI-B2017–74 and UJI-A2019–08 from Universitat Jaume I.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Basic and Clinical Psychology and Psychobiology, Universitat Jaume I, Av. de Vicent Sos Baynat, s/n, 12071, Castelló, Spain

    Jordi Ortet-Walker, Laura Mezquita, Verónica Vidal-Arenas, Generós Ortet & Manuel I. Ibáñez

  2. Centre for Biomedical Research Network on Mental Health (CIBERSAM), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain

    Laura Mezquita, Generós Ortet & Manuel I. Ibáñez

Authors
  1. Jordi Ortet-Walker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Laura Mezquita
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Verónica Vidal-Arenas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Generós Ortet
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Manuel I. Ibáñez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manuel I. Ibáñez.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 22 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ortet-Walker, J., Mezquita, L., Vidal-Arenas, V. et al. Validation of an abridged, 60-item form, of the Junior Spanish NEO inventory (JS NEO-A60). Curr Psychol 41, 6620–6630 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-01135-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-01135-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation