Skip to main content
Log in

Differences between Preadolescent Victims and Non-Victims of Cyberbullying in Cyber-Relationship Motives and Coping Strategies for Handling Problems with Peers

  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

While preliminary research supports the association of interpersonal difficulties with cyberbullying victimization in adolescence, it remains unclear how cyber-relationship motives and strategies for coping with stressful peer situations in “real settings” differ between victims and non-victims of cyberbullying. The purpose of this study was to verify whether there are differences between groups of cyberbullying victims (severe, occasional and non-victims) in regards to cyber-relationship motives and coping strategies for handling problems with peers among 1058 preadolescents aged 10–12 years. The results show that cyberbullying victims use the Internet to create new relationships, search for anonymity, escape the real world and to compensate for their lack of social skills to a greater extent than non-victims. Severe victims of cyberbullying also use less effective strategies to handle problems with peers than non-victims and occasional victims. The results of this study represent a new stimulus to thoroughly understand the psychological and behavioral factors associated with cyberbullying victimization and to identify key recommendations to develop more effective interventions and prevent cyberbullying episodes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akbulut, Y., Sahin, Y. L., & Eristi, B. (2010). Cyberbullying victimization among Turkish online social utility members. Educational Technology & Society, 13(4), 192–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andreou, E. (2001). Bully/victim problems and their association with coping behaviour in conflictual peer interactions among school-age children. Educational Psychology, 21(1), 59–66. doi:10.1080/01443410125042.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balakrishnan, V. (2015). Cyberbullying among young adults in Malaysia: the roles of gender, age and internet frequency. Computers in Human Behavior, 46, 149–157. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1991). Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 248–287. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90022-L.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandy, T., & Moore, K. A. (2011). What works for African American children and adolescents: Lessons from experimental evaluations of programs and interventions. Child Trends, 2011 .Available from: https://www.ncjtc.org/NCJTC_Member_Resources/Public/What%20Works%20%20African%20American%20Children.pdf

  • Beasley, T. M., & Schumacker, R. E. (1995). Multiple regression approach to analyzing contingency tables: Post hoc and planned comparison procedures. The Journal of Experimental Education, 64(1), 79–93. doi:10.1080/00220973.1995.9943797.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boulton, M. J., Trueman, M., Chau, C., Whitehand, C., & Amataya, K. (1999). Concurrent and longitudinal links between friendship and peer victimization: Implications for befriending interventions. Journal of Adolescence, 22, 461–466. doi:10.1006/jado.1999.0240.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bremer, J., & Rauch, P. K. (1998). Children and computers: Risks and benefits. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 37(5), 559–560. doi:10.1097/00004583-199805000-00019.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buelga, S., Cava, M. J., Musitu, G., & Torralba, E. (2015a). Cyberbullying aggressors among Spanish secondary education students: an exploratory study. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 12(2). doi:10.1108/ITSE-08-2014-0025.

  • Buelga, S., Iranzo, B., Cava, M. J., & Torralba, E. (2015b). Psychological profile of adolescent cyberbullying aggressors. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 30(2), 382–406. doi:10.1080/21711976.2015.1016754.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cappadocia, M. C., Craig, W. M., & Pepler, D. (2013). Cyberbullying prevalence, stability, and risk factors during adolescence. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 28(2), 171–192. doi:10.1177/0829573513491212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cassidy, T., & Taylor, L. (2005). Coping and psychological distress as a function of the bully victim dichotomy in older children. Social Psychology of Education, 8(3), 249–262. doi:10.1007/s11218–005-3021-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowie, H., & Smith, P. K. (2010). Peer support as a means of improving schools safety and reducing bullying and violence. In B. Doll, W. Pfohl, & J. Yoon (Eds.), Handbook of Youth Prevention Science (pp. 177–193). Nueva York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross, E., Piggen, R., Douglas, T., & Vonkaenel-Flatt, J. (2009). Virtual violence: Protecting children from cyberbullying. London: Beatbullying.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, C., & Eynon, R. (2012). Teenagers and technology. East Sussex: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, K., & Koepke, L. (2015). Risk and protective factors associated with cyberbullying: are relationships or rules more protective? Learning, Media and Technology, 1–25. doi:10.1080/17439884.2014.994219.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Morentin, J. I. M., Cortés, A., Medrano, C., & Apodaca, P. (2014). Internet use and parental mediation: A cross-cultural study. Computers & Education, 70, 212–221. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.07.036.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dempsey, A. G., Sulkowski, M. L., & Nichols, R. (2009). Differences between peer victimization in cyber and physical settings and associated psychosocial adjustment in early adolescence. Psychology in the Schools, 46(10), 962–972. doi:10.1002/pits.20437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durlak, J. A., Weissberg, R. P., Dymnicki, A. B., Taylor, R. D., & Schellinger, K. B. (2011). The impact of enhancing students’ social and emotional learning: A meta-analysis of school-based universal interventions. Child Development, 82(1), 405–432. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01564.x

  • Eslea, M., Menesini, E., Morita, Y., O'Moore, M., Mora-Merchán, J. A., Pereira, B., & Smith, P. K. (2004). Friendship and loneliness among bullies and victims: Data from seven countries. Aggressive Behavior, 30(1), 71–83. doi:10.1002/ab.20006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Estévez, E., Musitu, G., & Herrero, J. (2005). The influence of violent behavior and victimization at school on psychological distress: the role of parents and teachers. Adolescence, 40, 183195.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Estévez, A., Villardón, L., Calvete, E., Padilla, P., & Orue, I. (2010). Adolescentes víctimas de cyberbullying: prevalencia y características. Behavioral Psychotherapy, 18(1), 73–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkelhor, D., Turner, H., Ormrod, R., & Hamby, S. L. (2010). Trends in childhood violence and abuse exposure: evidence from 2 national surveys. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 164(3), 238–242. doi:10.1001/archpediatrics.2009.283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzpatrick, S., & Bussey, K. (2011). The development of the social bullying involvement scales. Aggressive Behavior, 37(2), 177–192. doi:10.1002/ab.20379.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, C. L., & Boulton, M. J. (2005). The social skills problems of victims of bullying: self, peer and teacher perceptions. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 313–328. doi:10.1348/000709905X25517.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frydenberg, E. (2004). Coping competencies: What to teach and when. Theory Into Practice, 43(1), 14–22. doi:10.1207/s15430421tip4301_3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frydenberg, E., & Lewis, R. (1996). A replication study of the structure of the adolescent coping scale: Multiple forms and applications of a self-report inventory in a counselling and research context. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 12(3), 224–235. doi:10.1027/1015-5759.12.3.224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gosling, S. D., & Mason, W. (2015). Internet research in psychology. Annual Review of Psychology, 66, 877–902. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015321.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gross, E. F. (2004). Adolescent internet use: what we expect, what teens report. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 25, 633–649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo, S. (2016). A meta-analysis of the predictors of cyberbullying perpetration and victimization. Psychology in the Schools, 53(4), 432–453. doi:10.1002/pits.21914.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrera, C., Grossman, J. B., Kauh, T. J., & McMaken, J. (2011). Mentoring in Schools: An Impact Study of Big Brothers Big Sisters School-Based Mentoring. Child Development, 82(1), 346–361. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01559.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Huttunen, A., Salmivalli, C., & Lagerspetz, K. M. (1996). Friendship networks and bullying in schools. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 794(1), 355–359. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1996.tb32541.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, L. M., Mitchell, K. J., & Finkelhor, D. (2012). Trends in youth internet victimization: Findings from three youth internet safety surveys 2000–2010. Journal of Adolescent Health, 50(2), 179–186. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2011.09.015.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Joronen, K., Konu, A., Rankin, H. S., & Åstedt-Kurki, P. (2012). An evaluation of a drama program to enhance social relationships and anti-bullying at elementary school: a controlled study. Health Promotion International, 27(1), 5–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jung, Y. E., Leventhal, B., Kim, Y. S., Park, T. W., Lee, S. H., Lee, M., Park, S. H., Yang, J. C., Chung, S. K., & Park, J. I. (2014). Cyberbullying, problematic internet use, and psychopathologic symptoms among Korean youth. Yonsei Medical Journal, 55(3), 826–830. doi:10.3349/ymj.2014.55.3.826.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Juvonen, J., & Gross, E. (2008). Extending the school grounds? Bullying experiences in cyberspace. The Journal of School Health, 78(9), 496–505. doi:10.1111/j.1746-1561.2008.00335.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kowalski, R. M., Giumetti, G. W., Schroeder, A. N., & Lattanner, M. R. (2014). Bullying in the digital age: A critical review and meta-analysis of cyberbullying research among youth. Psychological Bulletin, 140(4), 1073–1137. doi:10.1037/a0035618.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, R. S. (1984). Stress appraisal and coping. New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S. J. (2009). Online communication and adolescent social ties: who benefits more from internet use? Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14, 509–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mangope, H., Dinama, B., & Kefhilwe, M. (2012). Bullying and its consequences: A case of Botswana junior secondary schools. Journal of Education and Practice, 3(16), 65–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mesch, G. S. (2012). Technology and youth. New Directions for Youth Development, 2012(135), 97–105. doi:10.1002/yd.20032.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, P. M., Danaher, D. L., & Forbes, D. (1986). Sex-related strategies for coping with interpersonal conflict in children aged five and seven. Developmental Psychology, 22(4), 543–548. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.22.4.543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morales-Rodríguez, F. M., Trianes Torres, M. V., Blanca Mena, M. J., Miranda Páez, J., Escobar Espejo, M., & Fernández Baena, F. J. (2012). Escala de afrontamiento en niños: propiedades psicométricas. Anales de psicología, 28(2), 475–483. doi:10.6018/analesps.28.2.136221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Navarro, R., & Yubero, S. (2012). Impacto de la ansiedad social, las habilidades sociales y la cibervictimización en la comunicación online. Escritos de Psicología (Internet), 5(3), 4–15. doi:10.5231/psy.writ.2012.2009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Navarro, R., Yubero, S., Larrañaga, E., & Martínez, V. (2012). Children’s cyberbullying victimization: associations with social anxiety and social competence in a Spanish sample. Child indicators research, 5(2), 281–295. doi:10.1007/s12187-011-9132-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Navarro, R., Serna, C., Martínez, V., & Ruiz-Oliva, R. (2013). The role of Internet use and parental mediation on cyberbullying victimization among Spanish children from rural public schools. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 28(3), 725–745. doi:10.1007/s10212-012-0137-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Navarro, R., Yubero, S., & Larrañaga, E. (2015). Psychosocial Risk Factors for Involvement in Bullying Behaviors: Empirical Comparison between Cyberbullying and Social Bullying Victims and Bullies. School Mental Health, 7(4), 235–248. doi:10.1007/s12310-015-9157-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ortega-Barón, J. O., Vázquez, S. B., & Cava, M. J. (2016). The Influence of School and Family Environment on Adolescent Victims of Cyberbullying. Comunicar, 24, 57–65. doi:10.3916/C46-2016-06.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ovejero, A., Yubero, S., Larrañaga, E., & Moral, M. V. (2015). Cyberbullying: Definitions and Facts from a Psychosocial Perspective. In R. Navarro, S. Yubero, & E. Larrañaga (Eds.), Cyberbullying across the globe: gender, family and mental health (pp. 1–31). New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-25552-1_1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pabian, S., & Vandebosch, H. (2016). An investigation of short-term longitudinal associations between social anxiety and victimization and perpetration of traditional bullying and cyberbullying. Journal of youth and adolescence, 45(2), 328-339. doi: 10.1007/s10964-015-0259-3

  • Padilla-Walker, L. M., Fraser, A. M., Black, B. B., & Bean, R. A. (2015). Associations between friendship, sympathy, and prosocial behavior toward friends. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 25(1), 28–35. doi:10.1111/jora.12108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paiva, A., Dias, J., Sobral, D., Aylett, R., Woods, S., Hall, L., & Zoll, C. (2005). Learning by feeling: Evoking empathy with synthetic characters. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 19(3–4), 235–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papatraianou, L. H., Levine, D., & West, D. (2014). Resilience in the face of cyberbullying: an ecological perspective on young people’s experiences of online adversity. Pastoral Care in Education, 32(4), 264–283. doi:10.1080/02643944.2014.974661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peter, J., Valkenburg, P. M., & Schouten, A. P. (2006). Characteristics and motives of adolescents talking with strangers on the Internet. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 9(5), 526–530. doi:10.1089/cpb.2006.9.526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raskauskas, J., & Huynh, A. (2015). The process of coping with cyberbullying: A systematic review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 23, 118–125. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2015.05.019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin-Vaughan, A., Pepler, D., Brown, S., & Craig, W. (2011). Quest for the Golden Rule: An effective social skills promotion and bullying prevention program. Computers & Education, 56(1), 166–175. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.08.009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schäfer, M., Korn, S., Smith, P. K., Hunter, S. C., Mora-Merchán, J. A., Singer, M. M., & Meulen, K. (2004). Lonely in the crowd: Recollections of bullying. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 22(3), 379–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seiffge-Krenke, I., Molinar, R., Ciariano, S., Menna, P., Michel, G., Hoareau, E. & Hendry, L. B. (2010). Competence in coping with future-related stress in adolescents from France, Italy, Great Britain, and Germany. Journal of Happiness Studies, 11(6), 703–720. doi: 10.1007/s10902–009–9157-2

  • Ševčíková, A., Macháčková, H., Wright, M. F., Dědková, L., & Černá, A. (2015). Social Support Seeking in Relation to Parental Attachment and Peer Relationships Among Victims of Cyberbullying. Journal of Psychologists and Counsellors in Schools, 1–13. doi:10.1017/jgc.2015.1.

  • Shin, N., & Ahn, H. (2015). Factors affecting adolescents' involvement in cyberbullying: what divides the 20 % from the 80 %? Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 18(7), 393–399. doi:10.1089/cyber.2014.0362.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Slonje, R., Smith, P. K., & Frisén, A. (2013). The nature of cyberbullying, and strategies for prevention. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 26–32. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.05.024.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tokunaga, R. S. (2010). Following you home from school: a critical review and synthesis of research on cyberbullying victimization. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(3), 277–287. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2009.11.014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ttofi, M. M., & Farrington, D. P. (2011). Effectiveness of school-based programs to reduce bullying: A systematic and meta-analytic review. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 7(1), 27–56. doi:10.1007/s11292-010-9109-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2007). Preadolescents’ and adolescents’ online communication and their closeness to friends. Developmental Psychology, 43, 267–277. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.43.2.267.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2009). Social consequences of the Internet for adolescents. A decade of research. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 1–5. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01595.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2011). Online communication among adolescents: An integrated model of its attraction, opportunities, and risks. Journal of Adolescent Health, 48(2), 121–127. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2010.08.020.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Valkenburg, P. M., Peter, J., & Schouten, A. P. (2006). Friend networking websites and their relationship to adolescents’ well-being and self-esteem. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 9, 584–590. doi:10.1089/cpb.2006.9.584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walrave, M., & Heirman, W. (2011). Cyberbullying: predicting victimization and perpetration. Children & Society, 25, 59–72. doi:10.1111/j.1099-0860.2009.00260.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, C. C., & Chang, Y. T. (2010). Cyber relationship motives: Scale development and validation. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 38(3), 289–300. doi:10.2224/sbp.2010.38.3.289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webster-Stratton, C., Jamila Reid, M., & Stoolmiller, M. (2008). Preventing conduct problems and improving school readiness: evaluation of the incredible years teacher and child training programs in high-risk schools. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49(5), 471–488.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, M. A., Bukowski, W. M., & Lis, E. (2015). The Digital Self: How Social Media Serves as a Setting that Shapes Youth’s Emotional Experiences. Adolescent Research Review. doi:10.1007/s40894-015-0014-8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, M., Banerjee, R., Hoek, W., Rieffe, C., & Novin, S. (2010). Depression and social anxiety in children: Differential links with coping strategies. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 38(3), 405–419. doi:10.1007/s10802-009-9375-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ybarra, M. L., & Mitchell, K. J. (2004). Online aggressors/targets, aggressors, and targets: a comparison of associated youth characteristics.Journal of. Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45(7), 1308–1316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Raúl Navarro.

Ethics declarations

Compliance with Ethical Standards

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no financial or non-financial competing interests.

Authors’ Contributions

All authors contributed equally and significantly in writing this article. All authors take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This research was financed by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness under the National Program of Research and Innovation (I + D + i 2015): PSI2015–70,822-R.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Navarro, R., Larrañaga, E. & Yubero, S. Differences between Preadolescent Victims and Non-Victims of Cyberbullying in Cyber-Relationship Motives and Coping Strategies for Handling Problems with Peers. Curr Psychol 37, 116–127 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-016-9495-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-016-9495-2

Keywords

Navigation