Skip to main content
Log in

Rapid analysis of underivatized fatty acids by electrospray-ionization-ion mobility spectrometry

  • Original Research
  • Published:
International Journal for Ion Mobility Spectrometry

Abstract

The current analytical method for the determination of fatty acids is by GC-FAMEs (gas chromatography-Fatty Acid Methyl Esters). GC-FAMEs consist of a time-consuming esterification process to increase the volatility and decrease the polarity of fatty acids before gas chromatographic separation. The work reported here evaluates ion mobility spectrometry as alternative method for the analysis of FAMEs. Electrospray ionization—ion mobility spectrometry (ESI-IMS) enabled the rapid qualitative analysis of both the non-volatile and volatile fatty acids (FAs) and FAMEs. For the volatile FAME compounds, a 63Ni ionization source was also evaluated. While individual analytes worked well, a mixture of the FAME analytes experienced ion suppression. Introduction of a FAME analyte mixture by electrospray-ionization improved both detection and separation. The introduction of the FAs by direct ESI with ion mobility separation, however, provided the best results producing a rapid method for the characterization of FAs that did not require derivatization. Reduced mobility values (K0) were reported for the first time for six FA analytes: heneicosanoic acid (1.03 ± 0.02 cm2V−1 s−1), cis-11-eicosenoic acid (1.07 ± 0.02 cm2V−1 s−1) oleic acid (1.13 ± 0.0 cm2V−1 s−1),cis-vaccenic acid (1.13 ± 0.02 cm2V−1 s−1), γ-linolenic acid (1.16 ± 0.02 cm2V−1 s−1), and lauric acid (1.31 ± 0.02 cm2V−1 s−1), as well as their corresponding FAME analytes: methyl heneicosanoate (0.90 ± 0.02 cm2V−1 s−1), methyl-cis-11-eicosenate (0.96 ± 0.02 cm2V−1 s−1), cis-11-vaccenic acid methyl ester (1.03 ± 0.02 cm2V−1 s−1), methyl oleate (1.05 ± 0.02 cm2V−1 s−1), methyl linolenate (1.12 ± 0.02 cm2V−1 s−1), methyl laurate (1.21 ± 0.02 cm2V−1 s−1).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Christie WW (1993) Preparation of ester derivatives of fatty acids for chromatographic analysis. Adv Lipid Methodol: 69–111

  2. Smedes F, Askland TK (1999) Revisiting the development of the bligh and dyer total lipid determination method. Mar Pollut Bull 38(3):193–201

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Sawada H, Nogami C (2004) Capillary electrophoresis-electrospray ionization mass spectrometry using uncoated fused-silica capillaries and alkaline buffer solution for the analysis of small carboxylic acids. Anal Chim Acta 507:191–198

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. SF A. (1997) Handbook of instrumental techniques for analytical chemsitry

  5. Dodd RS, Rafii ZA (1995) Ecogeographic variation in seed fatty acids of Austrocedrus chilensis. Biochem Syst Ecol 23:825–833

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. von Muhlen C, Marriott PJ (2011) Retention indices in comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography. Anal Bioanal Chem 401:2351–2360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Johnson DW (2000) Alkyldimethylaminoethyl ester iodides for improved analysis of fatty acids by electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 14:2019–2024

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Rustan AC, Drevon CA (2005) Fatty acids: Structures and properies. Encyclopedia of life sciences

  9. Eiceman GA, Karpas Z (2005) Ion mobility spectrometry. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. Bruins AP, Henion JD, Covey TR (1987) Ion spray interface for combined liquid chromatography/atmospheric pressure ionization mass spectrometry. vol 59. Analytical Chemistry

  11. Davis EJ, Williams MD, Siems WF, Hill HHJ (2011) Voltage sweep ion mobility spectrometry. Anal Chem 83:1260–1267

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Matz LM, Hill HH, Beegle LW, Kanik I (2002) Investigation of drift gas selectivity in high resolution ion mobility spectrometry with mass spectrometry detection. 13:300–307

  13. Miller JM (2005) Chromatography: concepts and contrasts. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  14. Harris DC Quantitative chemical analysis. W.H. Freeman and Company, New York

  15. Jayalakshmi T, Santhakumaran A (2011) Statistical normalization and back propagation for classification. Int J Comput Theor Eng 3(1):1793–8201

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kanicky JR, Shah DO (2002) Effect of degree, type, and position of unsaturation on the pKa of long-chain fatty acids. J Colloid Interface Sci 256:201–207

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Wu C, Siems WF, Asbury GR, Hill HH (1998) Electrospray ionization high-resolution ion mobility spectrometry-mass spectrometry. Anal Chem 70:4929–4938

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The original suggestion that IMS analyses of FAMEs in the gas phase might be feasible was made by Mr. David Sickenberger, US Army Edgewood Chemical Biological Center, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Herbert H. Hill Jr..

Additional information

Submitted to International Journal of Ion Mobility Spectrometry February 2015

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tufariello, J.A., Grows, K., Davis, E.J. et al. Rapid analysis of underivatized fatty acids by electrospray-ionization-ion mobility spectrometry. Int. J. Ion Mobil. Spec. 18, 95–104 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12127-015-0167-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12127-015-0167-y

Keywords

Navigation