Abstract
The future of qualitative methods regards the kind of object cultural psychology is interested and the kind of questions it can ask. I propose that the object should be experiencing, understood as a complex whole, consisting of lived-by action and counter-action, that is contextual inter-action with the world in the form of an experiencing subject and otherness. The kind of questions cultural psychology can ask is instead related to the epistemological status attributed to both researcher and participant. Probably few scholars such as Vygotsky, Piaget and Lewin understood to what extent experiencing is always changing, because the relationship between mind, alterity and culture is co-generative. This also implies a relativization and a decentralization of the psychology’s perspective. Finally, I provide some examples from the history of psychology and some suggestions to work at the level of such complexity by using methods that can work with complex objects such as products of human activity (e.g., art, literature, architecture, etc.).
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The term “state” could sound a bit old-fashioned. Nevertheless, only in year 2013, PsychINFO Database reports 342 original peer-reviewed journal articles using this term in the abstract. It is used of course with different meanings in very each area of psychology (e.g., Schizophrenia & Psychotic States; Health & Mental Health Services; Promotion & Maintenance of Health & Wellness; Educational Administration & Personnel; Social Processes & Social Issues; Professional Personnel Attitudes & Characteristics; Curriculum & Programs & Teaching Methods; Professional Education & Training; Classroom Dynamics & Student Adjustment & Attitudes; Behavior Disorders & Antisocial Behavior; Community & Social Services). Even though this is just a superficial observation, it tells us that the term is still in wide use.
Subject’s reaction time in seconds.
This is probably the first historical mention of the so-called aha-experience.
References
Allport, G.W. (1967). Gordon W. Allport. In E. G. Boring, and G. Lindzey (Eds.), A history of psychology in autobiography, Vol V, (pp. 1–25). East Norwalk: Appleton-Century-Crofts. doi:10.1037/11579-000
Bakhtin, M.M. (1996). Forms of time and of the chronotope in the novel. In M.M. Bakhtin, The dialogic imagination: Four essays (Michael Holquist Ed) (pp. 84–258). Austin: University of Texas Press.
Bhabha, H. K. (1990). DissemiNation: time, narrative, and the margins of the modern nation. In H. K. Bhabha (Ed.), Nation and narration (pp. 291–322). New York: Routledge.
Brinkmann, S. (2007). Could interviews be epistemic?: an alternative to qualitative opinion polling. Qualitative Inquiry, 13(8), 1116–1138. doi:10.1177/1077800407308222.
Buehler, K. (1951). On thought connections. In D. Rapaport (Ed.), Organization and pathology of thought. Selected sources (pp. 39–57). New York: Columbia University Press.
Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Davidson, D. (1980). Mental events. In D. Davidson (Ed.), Essays on action and events (pp. 207–227). Oxford: Claredon Press.
Garfinkel, H. (2002). Ethnomethodology’s program. New York: Rowan and Littlefield.
Herbst, D. P. (1995). What happens when we make a distinction: An elementary introduction to cogenetic logic. In T. Kindermann & J. Valsiner (Eds.), Development of person-context relations (pp. 67–79). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
Höffding, H. (1905). The present state of psychology and its relations to the neighboring sciences. Psychological Review, XII(2–3), 67–77.
James, W. (1950). The principles of psychology (Vol. 1). Mineola: Dover Publications.
Liberman, K. (2013). More studies in ethnomethodology. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Merrell, F. (2005). Capoeira and Candomblé: conformity and resistance through afro-Brazilian experience. Princeton: Marcus Wiener Publishers.
Michell, J. (2010). The quantity/quality interchange: a blind spot on the highway of science. In A. Toomela & J. Valsiner (Eds.), Methodological thinking in psychology: 60 years gone astray? (pp. 45–68). Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.
Morey, L. C. (1987). Observations on the meeting between Allport and Freud. Psychoanalytic Review, 74(1), 135–139.
Mörtl, K., & Gelo, O.C.G. (2015). Qualitative methods in psychotherapy process research. In Psychotherapy research (pp. 381–428). Springer Vienna.
Peirce, C. S. (1935). In: C. Hartshorne, P. Weiss (Eds) Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, vols 1–6. Cambridge: Harvard University Press [original in 1901].
Rommetveit, R. (1992). Outlines of a dialogically based social-cognitive approach to human cognition and communication. In A. H. Wold (Ed.), The dialogical alternative (pp. 19–44). Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.
Salvatore, S. (2011). Psychotherapy research needs theory. Outline for an epistemology of the clinical exchange. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 45(3), 366–388. doi:10.1007/s12124-011-9180-9.
Salvatore, S., Gennaro, A., Valsiner, J., & Valsiner, J. (Eds.). (2013). Making sense of infinite uniqueness. The emerging system of idiographic science (Yearbook of idiographic science 4th ed.). Charlotte: IAP, Information Age Publishing.
Sellars, W. (1963). Science, perception and reality. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd.
Starks, H., & Trinidad, S. B. (2007). Choose your method: a comparison of phenomenology, discourse analysis, and grounded theory. Qualitative Health Research, 17(10), 1372–1380. doi:10.1177/1049732307307031.
Swift, J. (2005). Gulliver’s travels. In P. M. Parker (Ed.), Webster’s thesaurus edition. San Diego: ICON Group International.
Tateo, L. (2013). Generalization as creative and reflective act: revisiting Lewin’s conflict between Aristotelian and Galileian modes of thought in psychology. Theory & Psychology, 23(4), 518–536. doi:10.1177/0959354313488844.
Tateo, L. (2014). The dialogical dance: self, identity construction, positioning and embodiment in tango dancers. Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science, 48(3), 299–321. doi:10.1007/s12124-014-9258-2.
Tateo, L. (2015a). Temporality and generalization in psychology: time as context. In L. M. Simão, D. S. Guimarães, & J. Valsiner (Eds.), Temporality: culture in the flow of human experience. Charlotte: IAP, Information Age Publishers.
Tateo, L. (2015b). Giambattista Vico and the principles of cultural psychology: A programmatic retrospective. History of Human Sciences.
Tateo, L., & Marsico, G. (2013). The self as tension of wholeness and emptiness. Interacções, 24, 1–19.
Tateo, L., & Marsico, G. (2014). Open complementarity in cultural psychology. In B. Wagoner, N. Chaudhary, & P. Hviid (Eds.), Culture psychology and Its future: complementarity in a New Key (pp. 77–91). Charlotte: IAP, Information Age Publications.
Valsiner, J. (1998). The guided mind: a sociogenetic approach to personality. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Valsiner, J. (2012). A guided science: history of psychology in the mirror of its making. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.
Valsiner, J. (2014a). An invitation to cultural psychology. London: Sage.
Valsiner, J. (2014b). Functional reality of the quasi-real: Gegenstandstheorie and cultural psychology today. Culture & Psychology, 20(3), 285–307. doi:10.1177/1354067X14542532.
Varzi, A. (2001). The best question. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 30(3), 251–258. doi:10.1023/A:1017549407042.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Interaction between learning and development. In M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, & E. Souberman (Eds.), Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes (pp. 79–91). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Wiley, N. (1994). The semiotic self. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Wright Mills, C. (1959). The sociological imagination. New York: Oxford University Press.
Acknowledgments
This work has been funded by the Marie Curie IEF-2012 grant “EPICS. Epistemology in psychological science, the heritage of Giambattista Vico and the cultural psychology” at Aalborg University (Denmark).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tateo, L. Gulliver’s Eggs: Why Methods are not an Issue of Qualitative Research in Cultural Psychology. Integr. psych. behav. 49, 187–201 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-015-9296-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-015-9296-4