Skip to main content
Log in

Living Being and Speaking Being: Toward a Dialogical Approach to Intentionality

  • Target Article
  • Published:
Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

One of the main goals of cognitive science is to shed light on human knowledge. This paper states that, if daily conversations, literature, and private thought, are proper expressions of human behavior, then cognitive sciences ought to elaborate a concept of knowledge suited to this kind of activities. I draw upon the notion of discourse in Bakhtin to specify the attributes of knowing needed to account for human behavior, whose manifestations in everyday life are not reduced to representing objects but essentially oriented toward responding to others. As a central aspect of knowledge, I focus on intentionality and offer a discussion about different aspects of it. Specifically, I examine the difference between intentionality as the faculty of representation (aboutness) and intentionality as the subjective positioning toward contextually relevant ideological perspectives (meaning).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination. Austin: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakhtin, M. M. (1984). Problems of Dostoevskys poetics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bechtell, W. (1998). Representations and cognitive explanations: Assessing the dynamicist challenge in cognitive science. Cognitive Science, 22, 295–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Churchland, P. (1986). Neurophilosophy. Cambridge: MIT Press.

  • Cole, M. (2002). Culture and development. In H. Keller, Y. H. Poortinga, & A. Schömerick (Eds.) Between culture and biology: Perspectives on ontogenetic development (pp. 303–319). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenfield, P. (2002). The mutual definition of culture and biology in development. In H. Keller, Y. H. Poortinga, & A. Schömerick (Eds.) Between culture and biology: Perspectives on ontogenetic development (pp. 57–77). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maturana, H., & Valera, F. (1980). Autopoiesis and cognition: The realization of the living. Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, C. S. (1931–1958). Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J. (1983). Intentionality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomasello, M. (1999). The cultural origins of human cognition. Harvard University Press.

  • Volosinov, V. N. (1929/1992). Marxism and the philosophy of language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. (1934/1962). Thinking and speech. In R. W. Rieber & A. S. Carton (Eds.) The Collected Works of L. S. Vygotsky: Vol. 1 (pp. 37–285). New York: Plenum Press.

Download references

Acknowledgements

I am grateful to Antonia Larraín, Ivana Marková, Per Linell, Michèle Grossen, Selma Leitão, and Diego Cosmelli for their useful comments on a previous version of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrés A. Haye.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Haye, A.A. Living Being and Speaking Being: Toward a Dialogical Approach to Intentionality. Integr. psych. behav. 42, 157–163 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-007-9051-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-007-9051-6

Keywords

Navigation