Skip to main content
Log in

Adjudicating Frame Shifts and Frame Disputes in the New Millennial University: The Role of the Dean

  • Published:
The American Sociologist Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper argues that sociological theory provides a sound basis for analyzing the social organization and reorganization of the college or university and for guiding the activities of the college dean. Frame analysis theory, developed in the study of social movements, and the attendant concepts of frame shifts and frame disputes, are drawn on to facilitate understanding of the organizational change being experienced by many comprehensive universities today. Various university constituencies proffer sometimes competing frames that can be characterized as “old school” vs. “new school” or “theoretical” vs. “practical,” yet collective and at least moderately harmonious action is required to attend to the tasks at hand. More specifically, the processes of frame alignment detailing the way that the frames held by various individuals and groups link to larger frames, offer a valuable theoretical tool for a dean. The dean’s task is one of adjudicating frame disputes within the college, navigating frame shifts in the university and reframing the concerns of the college to both internal and external audiences. The author concludes that the use of frame analysis demonstrates that sociological theory can be a vital contributor to the leadership of colleges and universities and to leaders’ understanding of the changes occurring therein.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. I use the term “millennial university” to refer to modern American universities in the new millennium, especially comprehensive private universities that are being redefined as more research oriented, and more specifically, more oriented to practical research and teaching. Such a demand is fueled by industry and business, but also by a new generation of students, often referred to as the “millennial generation,” who are themselves oriented to what they view as relevant and useful content, as in, for example, their incorporation of internet technologies such as “Facebook.” Such a demand on the part of students is compelling and cannot be ignored by either the university administration or the professoriate. Such demands results in adjustment in the university itself, and make the use of the term “millennial university” appropriate.

References

  • American Association of Colleges & Universities (2002). Greater expectations: A new vision for learning as a nation goes to college. Washington, DC: AAC&U.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, H. S. (1967). Social Problems, 14(3), 239–247, Winter.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benford, R. D. (1993). Frame disputes within the nuclear disarmament movement. Social Forces, 71, 677–701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benford, R. D., & Snow, D. A. (2000). Framing processes and social movements: an overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 611–639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coser, L. A. (1977). Masters of sociological thought: Ideas in historical and social context (2nd edn.). New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donoghue, F. (2008). The last professors: The corporate university and the fate of the humanities. New York: Fordham University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerth, H. & Mills, C. W. (Eds.) and trans. (1946) From Max Weber. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Giddens, A. (1971). Capitalism and modern social theory: An analysis of the writings of Marx, Durkheim and Max Weber. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gouldner, A. W. (1968). The sociologist as Partisan: sociology and the welfare state. American Sociologist, 3(2), 103–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, E. C. (1971). The sociological eye: Selected papers. Chicago: Aldine-Atherton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lessor, R., Cervantes, N., O’Connor, N., Balmaceda, J., & Asch, R. (1993). An analysis of social and psychological characteristics of women volunteering to become oocyte donors. Fertility and Sterility, 59(1), 65–71, January.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, L. (1984). Liberal arts in an age of technology. American Education, June. http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1011/is_v20/ai_3285487/print.

  • Mills, C. W. (1959). The sociological imagination. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. (2006). For a conference on Tagore’s Philosophy of Education, in memory of Amita Sen, Kolkata, March 29–30. http://academic.evergreen.edu/curricular/awareness2006/Martha%20Nussbaum’s%20Liberal%20Education%20Paper.doc.

  • Park, R. S. (1952). Human communities. New York: Free.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, D. A. (2006). Framing and social movements. In R. George (Ed.), Blackwell encyclopedia of sociology (pp. 1780–1784). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, D. A., & Lessor R. (2007). Framing hazards in the health arena: misframings, frame disputes & frame shifts in relation to obesity, work-related diseases, and gamete transfer in infertility. Presented at Conference on Health and Social Movements, University of Michigan, October.

  • Snow, D., Rochford, E. B., Worden, S. K., & Benford, R. D. (1986). Frame alignment processes, micromobilization, and movement participation. American Sociological Review, 51(4), 464–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steck, H. (2003). Corporatization of the university: seeking conceptual clarity. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 585, 66–83, Higher Education in the Twenty-First Century, January.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A. L., Fagerhaugh, S., Suczek, B., & Wiener, C. (1985). The social organization of medical work. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, W. I., & Znaniecki, F. (1918). The Polish peasant in Europe and America. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1947). The theory of social and economic organization. In T. Parsons (Ed)., Translated and by A.M. Henderson and Talcott Parsons. New York: Free.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roberta G. Lessor.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lessor, R.G. Adjudicating Frame Shifts and Frame Disputes in the New Millennial University: The Role of the Dean. Am Soc 39, 114–129 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-008-9046-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-008-9046-x

Keywords

Navigation