Abstract
In the present studies, participants viewed a brief staged video of a physical confrontation between a police officer and a civilian. Participants were then asked if the police officer had used excessive force. When people view videos of police officer-civilian confrontations, their judgements concerning the use of excessive force by officers are likely constrained by various framing factors. Our studies were designed to investigate the effects of two different contextual frames on participants’ judgements of police officer use of excessive force. 1) We investigated how informational frames accompanying a confrontation video, might frame judgments about use of excessive force, and 2) we investigated how demographic frames, or demographic characteristics, might frame judgments of excessive force. In Study 1, an informational frame warned participants that the confrontation video captured a very brief segment of an event that transpired over a longer period of time. In Study 2, the video was accompanied with an informational frame in which a rationale for the activity of the police officer was explained. Police officer gender was experimentally manipulated in both studies: participants saw a video of either a female or a male police officer affecting an arrest. Participant demographic information was also collected. Logistic regression analysis showed that judgments of excessive force were related to participant demographic characteristics but not to police officer gender. The informational frames appeared to have no effect on excessive force judgments. The results have implications for future research regarding the types of factors that frame people’s judgments of the use of force by police officers when watching police officer-civilian confrontation videos. The results also have implications for efforts to provide a context for these types of videos when they appear in television news programs.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The police officers who acted in our confrontation videos were actual police officers who worked for the Taylorsville Police Department in North Carolina.
References
Ariely, D., Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (2003). Coherent arbitrariness: Stable demand curves without stable preferences. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118, 73–105.
Baker, M. A., Fox, P., & Wingrove, T. (2016). Crowdsourcing as a forensic psychology research tool. American Journal of Forensic Psychology, 34, 37–50.
Bradford, B., Jackson, J., & Stanko, E. B. (2009). Contact and confidence: Revisiting asymmetry in the impact of encounters with the police. Policing and Society, 19, 1–19.
Brown, B., & Benedict, W. (2002). Perceptions of the police: Past findings, methodological issues, conceptual issues, and policy implications. Policing, 25, 543–580.
Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011). Amazon’s mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 3–5.
Bureau of Justice Statistics (2013). Study finds some racial difference in perceptions of police beahvior during contact with the public. Retrieved from: http://www.bjs.gov/.
Carr, P. J., Napolitano, L., & Keating, J. (2007). We never call the cops and here is why: A qualitative examination of legal cynicism in three Philadelphia neighborhoods. Criminology, 45, 701–736.
Crank, D., & Caldero, M. (2000). Police ethics: The corruption of noble cause. Cincinnati: Anderson Publishing Company.
Cush, R. K., & Delahunty, J. G. (2006). The influence of limiting instructions on processing and judgments of emotionally evocative evidence. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 13, 110–123.
Engel, R. S. (2005). Citizens’ perceptions of distributive and procedural injustice during traffic stops with police. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 42, 445–481.
Goodman, J. K., Cryder, C. E., & Cheema, A. (2013). Data collection in a flat world: The strengths and weaknesses of mechanical Turk samples. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 26, 213–224.
Hagen, J., Shedd, C., & Payne, M. R. (2005). Race, ethnicity, and youth perception of injustice. American Sociological Review, 70, 381–407.
Hennigan, K. M., Maxson, C. L., Sloane, D., & Ranney, M. (2002). Community views on crime and policing: Survey mode effects on bias in community surveys. Justice Quarterly, 19, 565–587.
Huang, C., & Vaughn, M. (1996). Support and confidence: Public attitudes towards the police. In T. J. Flanagan & D. R. Longmire (Eds.), Americans view crime and justice: A national public opinion survey (pp. 31–45). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
MacDonald, J., Stokes, R. J., Ridgeway, G., & Riley, K. J. (2007). Race, neighborhood context and perceptions of injustice by the police in Cincinnati. Urban Studies, 2007, 2567–2585.
Mason, W., & Suri, S. (2012). Conducting behavioural research on Amazon’s mechanical Turk. Behavior Research Methods, 44, 1–23.
Minsky, M. (1997). A framework for representing knowledge. In J. Haugeland, J. Haugeland (Eds.), Mind design 2: Philosophy, psychology, artificial intelligence (2nd rev. & enlarged ed.) (pp. 111–142). Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Nabi, R. L. (2003). 'Feeling' resistance: Exploring the role of emotionally evocative visuals in inducing inoculation. Media Psychology, 5, 199–223.
NBC Chicago. (2015). Dashcam video showing 2nd police shooting released Monday. NBC Chicago News Network. Released December, 7, 2015. http://www.nbchicago.com/.
Page-Gould, E., Mendoza-Denton, R., & Tropp, L. R. (2008). With a little help from my cross-group friend: Reducing anxiety in intergroup contexts through cross-group friendship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1080–1094.
Paolacci, G., & Chandler, J. (2014). Inside the Turk: Understanding mechanical Turk as a participant pool. Current Directions in Psychology Science, 23, 184–188.
Paolacci, G., Chandler, J., & Ipeirotis, P. G. (2010). Running experiments on Amazon mechanical Turk. Judgment and Decision making, 5, 411–419.
Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 751–783.
Pratkins, A. R., Breckler, S. J., & Greenwald, A. G. (1989). Attitude, structure, and function. Hove: Psychology Press.
Public Religion Research Institute (2015). Survey: Deep divide between Black and White Americans on criminal justice system’s racial equality; persists from Rodney King to Freddie Gray, May 2015 PRRI Religion & Politics Tracking Survey. Retrieved from http://www.publicreiligion.org/.
Reisig, M. D., & Parks, R. B. (2000). Experience, quality of life, and neighbourhood context: A hierarchical analysis of satisfaction with police. Justice Quarterly, 12, 42–62.
Rosenbaum, D. P., Schuck, A. M., Costello, S. K., Hawkins, D. F., & Ring, M. K. (2005). Attitudes toward the police: The effects of direct and vicarious experience. Police Quarterly, 8, 343–365.
Rosenfeld, R., Rojek, J., & Decker, S. (2012). Age matters: Race difference in police searches of young and older male drivers. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 49, 31–55.
Sampson, R. J., & Bartusch, D. J. (1998). Legal cynicism and (subcultural?) tolerance of deviance: The neighbourhood context of racial differences. Law and Society Review, 32, 777–804.
Schuck, A. M., & Rabe-Hemp, C. (2005). Women police: The use of force by and against female officers. Women & Criminal Justice, 16, 91–117.
Sears, D. O. (1986). College sophomore in the laboratory: Influence of a narrow data base on social psychology’s view of human nature. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 515–530.
Sharp, E., & Johnson, P. (2009). Accounting for variation in distrust of the police. Justice Quarterly, 26, 157–812.
Skogan, W. (2006). Asymmetry in the impact of encounters with police. Policing and Society, 16, 99–126.
Sleed, M., Durrheim, K., Kriel, A., Solomon, V., & Baxter, V. (2002). The effectiveness of the vignette methodology: A comparison of written and video vignettes in eliciting responses about date rape. South African Journal Of Psychology, 32, 21–28.
Smith, M. R., & Petrocelli, M. (2001). Racial profiling? A multivariate analysis of police traffic stop data. Police Quarterly, 4, 4–27.
Stewart, E. A., Baumer, E. P., Brunson, R. K., & Simons, R. L. (2009). Neighborhood racial context and perceptions of police-based racial discrimination among black youth. Criminology, 47, 847–887.
Sunshine, J., & Tyler, T. R. (2003). The role of procedural justice and legitimacy in shaping public support for policing. Law and Society Review, 37, 555–589.
The National Center for Women & Policing (2002). Men, women, and police excessive force: A tale of two genders. The national Center for Women & Policing, a division of the Feminist Majority Foundation, 1–11.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124–1131.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211, 453–458.
Tyler, T. R. (1990). Why people obey the law. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Tyler, T. R. (2001). Public trust and confidence in legal authorities: What do majority and minority group members want from legal authorities? Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 19, 323–345.
Tyler, T. R., & Fagen, J. (2008). Legitimacy and cooperation: Why do people help the police fight crime in their communities? Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, 6, 231–275.
Tyler, T. R., & Huo, Y. J. (2002). Trust in the law. New York: Russell Sage.
U.S. Department of Justice. (1987). Principles of good policing: Avoiding violence between police and civilians. Washington, DC: Author.
Weitzer, R. (2000). Racialized policing. Law and Society Review, 34, 129–155.
Weitzer, R. (2014). The puzzling neglect of Hispanic Americans in research on police-citizen relations. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 37, 1995–2013.
Weitzer, R., & Tuch, S. A. (2002). Incidents of police misconduct and public opinions. Journal of Criminal Justice, 30, 397–408.
Weitzer, R., & Tuch, S. A. (2004). Race and perceptions of police misconduct. Social Problems, 51, 305–325.
Weitzer, R., & Tuch, S. A. (2005a). Determinants of public satisfaction with the police. Police Quarterly, 8, 279–297.
Weitzer, R., & Tuch, S. A. (2005b). Racially biased policing: Determinants of civilian perceptions. Social Forces, 83, 1009–1030.
Wells, W. (2007). Types of contact and evaluations of police officers: The effects of procedural justice across three types of police-citizen contacts. Journal of Criminal Justice, 35, 612–621.
West, T. V., & Kenny, D. A. (2011). The truth and bias model of judgment (T&B). Psychological Review, 118, 357–378.
WGN TV (2015). Cook County State’s Attorney Anita Alverez’s live press conference. WGN TV Chicago’s Very Own Network. Televised on December 7, 2015. http://www.wgntv.com/.
Acknowledgements
We would like to acknowledge the members of the Taylorsville Police Department located in North Carolina for helping us create an authentic police-civilian confrontation video. We truly appreciate the time, information, and resources that many Taylorsville Police Officers provided us during the design and data collection stages of our studies. We would also like to thank the undergraduate research assistants who helped us with the study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Baker, M.A., Bacharach, V.R. Police Officer-Civilian Confrontations Caught on Camera: the Influence of Contextual Frames on Judgements of Excessive Force. Am J Crim Just 42, 683–697 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-017-9387-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-017-9387-5