Skip to main content
Log in

Police Officer-Civilian Confrontations Caught on Camera: the Influence of Contextual Frames on Judgements of Excessive Force

  • Published:
American Journal of Criminal Justice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the present studies, participants viewed a brief staged video of a physical confrontation between a police officer and a civilian. Participants were then asked if the police officer had used excessive force. When people view videos of police officer-civilian confrontations, their judgements concerning the use of excessive force by officers are likely constrained by various framing factors. Our studies were designed to investigate the effects of two different contextual frames on participants’ judgements of police officer use of excessive force. 1) We investigated how informational frames accompanying a confrontation video, might frame judgments about use of excessive force, and 2) we investigated how demographic frames, or demographic characteristics, might frame judgments of excessive force. In Study 1, an informational frame warned participants that the confrontation video captured a very brief segment of an event that transpired over a longer period of time. In Study 2, the video was accompanied with an informational frame in which a rationale for the activity of the police officer was explained. Police officer gender was experimentally manipulated in both studies: participants saw a video of either a female or a male police officer affecting an arrest. Participant demographic information was also collected. Logistic regression analysis showed that judgments of excessive force were related to participant demographic characteristics but not to police officer gender. The informational frames appeared to have no effect on excessive force judgments. The results have implications for future research regarding the types of factors that frame people’s judgments of the use of force by police officers when watching police officer-civilian confrontation videos. The results also have implications for efforts to provide a context for these types of videos when they appear in television news programs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The police officers who acted in our confrontation videos were actual police officers who worked for the Taylorsville Police Department in North Carolina.

References

  • Ariely, D., Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (2003). Coherent arbitrariness: Stable demand curves without stable preferences. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118, 73–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, M. A., Fox, P., & Wingrove, T. (2016). Crowdsourcing as a forensic psychology research tool. American Journal of Forensic Psychology, 34, 37–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradford, B., Jackson, J., & Stanko, E. B. (2009). Contact and confidence: Revisiting asymmetry in the impact of encounters with the police. Policing and Society, 19, 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, B., & Benedict, W. (2002). Perceptions of the police: Past findings, methodological issues, conceptual issues, and policy implications. Policing, 25, 543–580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011). Amazon’s mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 3–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bureau of Justice Statistics (2013). Study finds some racial difference in perceptions of police beahvior during contact with the public. Retrieved from: http://www.bjs.gov/.

  • Carr, P. J., Napolitano, L., & Keating, J. (2007). We never call the cops and here is why: A qualitative examination of legal cynicism in three Philadelphia neighborhoods. Criminology, 45, 701–736.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crank, D., & Caldero, M. (2000). Police ethics: The corruption of noble cause. Cincinnati: Anderson Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cush, R. K., & Delahunty, J. G. (2006). The influence of limiting instructions on processing and judgments of emotionally evocative evidence. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 13, 110–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engel, R. S. (2005). Citizens’ perceptions of distributive and procedural injustice during traffic stops with police. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 42, 445–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, J. K., Cryder, C. E., & Cheema, A. (2013). Data collection in a flat world: The strengths and weaknesses of mechanical Turk samples. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 26, 213–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagen, J., Shedd, C., & Payne, M. R. (2005). Race, ethnicity, and youth perception of injustice. American Sociological Review, 70, 381–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hennigan, K. M., Maxson, C. L., Sloane, D., & Ranney, M. (2002). Community views on crime and policing: Survey mode effects on bias in community surveys. Justice Quarterly, 19, 565–587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, C., & Vaughn, M. (1996). Support and confidence: Public attitudes towards the police. In T. J. Flanagan & D. R. Longmire (Eds.), Americans view crime and justice: A national public opinion survey (pp. 31–45). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, J., Stokes, R. J., Ridgeway, G., & Riley, K. J. (2007). Race, neighborhood context and perceptions of injustice by the police in Cincinnati. Urban Studies, 2007, 2567–2585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, W., & Suri, S. (2012). Conducting behavioural research on Amazon’s mechanical Turk. Behavior Research Methods, 44, 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minsky, M. (1997). A framework for representing knowledge. In J. Haugeland, J. Haugeland (Eds.), Mind design 2: Philosophy, psychology, artificial intelligence (2nd rev. & enlarged ed.) (pp. 111–142). Cambridge: The MIT Press.

  • Nabi, R. L. (2003). 'Feeling' resistance: Exploring the role of emotionally evocative visuals in inducing inoculation. Media Psychology, 5, 199–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NBC Chicago. (2015). Dashcam video showing 2nd police shooting released Monday. NBC Chicago News Network. Released December, 7, 2015. http://www.nbchicago.com/.

    Google Scholar 

  • Page-Gould, E., Mendoza-Denton, R., & Tropp, L. R. (2008). With a little help from my cross-group friend: Reducing anxiety in intergroup contexts through cross-group friendship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1080–1094.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paolacci, G., & Chandler, J. (2014). Inside the Turk: Understanding mechanical Turk as a participant pool. Current Directions in Psychology Science, 23, 184–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paolacci, G., Chandler, J., & Ipeirotis, P. G. (2010). Running experiments on Amazon mechanical Turk. Judgment and Decision making, 5, 411–419.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 751–783.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pratkins, A. R., Breckler, S. J., & Greenwald, A. G. (1989). Attitude, structure, and function. Hove: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Public Religion Research Institute (2015). Survey: Deep divide between Black and White Americans on criminal justice system’s racial equality; persists from Rodney King to Freddie Gray, May 2015 PRRI Religion & Politics Tracking Survey. Retrieved from http://www.publicreiligion.org/.

  • Reisig, M. D., & Parks, R. B. (2000). Experience, quality of life, and neighbourhood context: A hierarchical analysis of satisfaction with police. Justice Quarterly, 12, 42–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, D. P., Schuck, A. M., Costello, S. K., Hawkins, D. F., & Ring, M. K. (2005). Attitudes toward the police: The effects of direct and vicarious experience. Police Quarterly, 8, 343–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenfeld, R., Rojek, J., & Decker, S. (2012). Age matters: Race difference in police searches of young and older male drivers. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 49, 31–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R. J., & Bartusch, D. J. (1998). Legal cynicism and (subcultural?) tolerance of deviance: The neighbourhood context of racial differences. Law and Society Review, 32, 777–804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuck, A. M., & Rabe-Hemp, C. (2005). Women police: The use of force by and against female officers. Women & Criminal Justice, 16, 91–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sears, D. O. (1986). College sophomore in the laboratory: Influence of a narrow data base on social psychology’s view of human nature. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 515–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharp, E., & Johnson, P. (2009). Accounting for variation in distrust of the police. Justice Quarterly, 26, 157–812.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skogan, W. (2006). Asymmetry in the impact of encounters with police. Policing and Society, 16, 99–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sleed, M., Durrheim, K., Kriel, A., Solomon, V., & Baxter, V. (2002). The effectiveness of the vignette methodology: A comparison of written and video vignettes in eliciting responses about date rape. South African Journal Of Psychology, 32, 21–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. R., & Petrocelli, M. (2001). Racial profiling? A multivariate analysis of police traffic stop data. Police Quarterly, 4, 4–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, E. A., Baumer, E. P., Brunson, R. K., & Simons, R. L. (2009). Neighborhood racial context and perceptions of police-based racial discrimination among black youth. Criminology, 47, 847–887.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sunshine, J., & Tyler, T. R. (2003). The role of procedural justice and legitimacy in shaping public support for policing. Law and Society Review, 37, 555–589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The National Center for Women & Policing (2002). Men, women, and police excessive force: A tale of two genders. The national Center for Women & Policing, a division of the Feminist Majority Foundation, 1–11.

  • Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124–1131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211, 453–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. R. (1990). Why people obey the law. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. R. (2001). Public trust and confidence in legal authorities: What do majority and minority group members want from legal authorities? Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 19, 323–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. R., & Fagen, J. (2008). Legitimacy and cooperation: Why do people help the police fight crime in their communities? Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, 6, 231–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. R., & Huo, Y. J. (2002). Trust in the law. New York: Russell Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Justice. (1987). Principles of good policing: Avoiding violence between police and civilians. Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weitzer, R. (2000). Racialized policing. Law and Society Review, 34, 129–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weitzer, R. (2014). The puzzling neglect of Hispanic Americans in research on police-citizen relations. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 37, 1995–2013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weitzer, R., & Tuch, S. A. (2002). Incidents of police misconduct and public opinions. Journal of Criminal Justice, 30, 397–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weitzer, R., & Tuch, S. A. (2004). Race and perceptions of police misconduct. Social Problems, 51, 305–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weitzer, R., & Tuch, S. A. (2005a). Determinants of public satisfaction with the police. Police Quarterly, 8, 279–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weitzer, R., & Tuch, S. A. (2005b). Racially biased policing: Determinants of civilian perceptions. Social Forces, 83, 1009–1030.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wells, W. (2007). Types of contact and evaluations of police officers: The effects of procedural justice across three types of police-citizen contacts. Journal of Criminal Justice, 35, 612–621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West, T. V., & Kenny, D. A. (2011). The truth and bias model of judgment (T&B). Psychological Review, 118, 357–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WGN TV (2015). Cook County State’s Attorney Anita Alverez’s live press conference. WGN TV Chicago’s Very Own Network. Televised on December 7, 2015. http://www.wgntv.com/.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge the members of the Taylorsville Police Department located in North Carolina for helping us create an authentic police-civilian confrontation video. We truly appreciate the time, information, and resources that many Taylorsville Police Officers provided us during the design and data collection stages of our studies. We would also like to thank the undergraduate research assistants who helped us with the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Melissa A. Baker.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(MP4 42738 kb)

ESM 2

(MP4 45308 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Baker, M.A., Bacharach, V.R. Police Officer-Civilian Confrontations Caught on Camera: the Influence of Contextual Frames on Judgements of Excessive Force. Am J Crim Just 42, 683–697 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-017-9387-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-017-9387-5

Keywords

Navigation