Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Sifting Through the Ashes: Processing Arsonists in Juvenile Justice

  • Published:
American Journal of Criminal Justice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

National estimates have suggested that less than one-in-five arsons are cleared by arrest. Interestingly, juveniles account for nearly 50% of arson arrests, a proportion greater than all other non-status offenses. While the criminological literature on juvenile arson has been fairly consistent, a dearth of applied criminological literature has observed how the juvenile justice system responds to arsonists. Drawing on data on more than 5,000 juveniles from a large southern state, this study was able to differentiate between the system responses for arsonists and other felons. The findings suggested that the juvenile justice system distinguished between arsonists and other felons in some respects, but these distinctions failed to align with the suggested approaches of the criminological literature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. We would like to thank an anonymous reviewer that suggested more comprehensive descriptive statistics on intentionally set fires in the United States. Readers interested in these reports should visit the United States Fire Administration’s website at http://www.usfa.dhs.gov/.

  2. Several factors may contribute to the disproportionately high number of arsons cleared by a juvenile arrest. First, given the impulsive nature and familial dysfunctions (Becker et al., 2004; Kolko & Kazdin, 1990; Sakheim & Osborn, 1986), juvenile arson appears to be a poorly planned out event at best and, at worst, an outcry for relief from the arsonists’ environments. In either case, identification of a suspect is much easier for law enforcement when the suspect lacks criminal sophistication or acts impulsively.

  3. While there have been a limited number of scholarly efforts focused on how best to respond to juvenile arsonist, governmental agencies have established the need and called for further exploration of this topic. For example, both the U.S. Fire Administration and the Australian Bushfire Arson Prevention Initiative have published work promoting prevention and intervention strategies.

  4. The purpose of providing the sample characteristics is for a general understanding of the sample, not to make any inferences about the population of referrals or offenders.

  5. Aligning with previous research, our preliminary findings (not represented in tabular form) suggested that these arsonists were more likely to experience established risk factors of arson (e.g., behavioral health manifestations) and less likely to exhibit previous criminal associations or behaviors.

  6. The variance inflation factors (VIF) to test for multicollinearity among the independent variables was within the acceptable range (Gujarati, 2003), with the mean VIF = 1.10 and all independent variables being less than 1.37.

  7. The multinomial logistic regression model of case disposition level was significant (χ 2 = 407.33, p < .01). Additionally, the Small-Hsiao test for independence of irrelevant alternatives (IIA) (Long & Freese, 2006) suggested that the model met the model assumption.

  8. The model significantly predicted the type of community supervision (χ 2 = 673.37, p < .01) and the Small-Hsiao test failed to reject the null hypothesis, supporting the IIA (Long & Freese, 2006).

  9. The model significantly predicted treatment focused programming (χ 2 = 73.21, p < .01), with 2,003 youth of the sample being placed in some form of specialized program.

References

  • Armstrong, G. S., & Rodriguez, N. (2005). Effects of individual and contextual characteristics on preadjudication detention of juvenile delinquents. Justice Quarterly, 22(4), 521–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, K. D., Stuewig, J., Herrera, V. M., & McCloskey, L. A. (2004). A study of firesetting and animal cruelty in children: Family influences and adolescent outcomes. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 43(7), 905–912.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, D., Jr., & Lang, K. (1985). The intake dispositions of juvenile offenders. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 22(4), 309–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox-Jones, C., Lubestsky, M. J., Fultz, S. A., & Kolko, D. J. (1990). Case study: Inpatient psychiatric treatment of a young recidivist firesetter. The American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 29(6), 936–941.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fine, S., & Louie, D. (1979). Juvenile firesetters – Do agencies help? American Journal of Psychiatry, 136(4A), 433–435.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frazier, C. E., & Bishop, D. M. (1985). The pretrial detention of juveniles and its impact on case dispositions. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 76(4), 1132–1152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghetti, S., & Redlich, A. D. (2001). Reactions to youth crime: Perceptions of accountability and competency. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 19(1), 33–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gujarati, D. N. (2003). Basic econometrics (4th). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath, G. A., Hardesty, V. A., Goldfine, P. E., & Walker, A. M. (1985). Diagnosis and childhood firesetting. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 41(4), 571–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, R. W., Langevin, R., Paitich, D., Handy, L., Russon, A., & Wilkinson, L. (1982). Is arson an aggressive act or a property offence? A controlled study of psychiatric referrals. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 27(8), 648–654.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karchmer, C. L. (1984). Young arsonists. Social Science & Public Policy, 22(1), 78–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolko, D. J., & Kazdin, A. E. (1990). Matchplay and firesetting in children: Relationship to parent, marital, and family dysfunction. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 19(3), 229–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolko, D. J., & Kazdin, A. E. (1991). Aggression and psychopathology in matchplaying and firesetting children: A replication and extension. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 20(2), 191–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leiber, M. J., & Stairs, J. M. (1999). Race, contexts, and the use of intake diversion. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 36(1), 56–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long, J. S., & Freese, J. (2006). Regression models for categorical dependent variables using stata (2 nd ). College Station: Stata.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierce, J. L., & Hardesty, V. A. (1997). Non-referral of psychopathological child firesetters to mental health services. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 53(4), 349–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasanen, R., Hirvenoja, R., Hakko, H., & Vaisanen, E. (1995). A study of the finnish juvenile arsonists. Forensic Science International, 73, 41–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ray, K. E. B., & Alarid, L. F. (2004). Examining racial disparity of male property offenders in the Missouri juvenile justice system. Youth Violence & Juvenile Justice, 2(2), 107–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Repo, E., & Virkkunen, M. (1997). Young arsonists: History of conduct disorder, psychiatric diagnoses and criminal recidivism. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 8(2), 311–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Root, C., MacKay, S., Henderson, J., Del Bove, G., & Warling, D. (2008). The link between maltreatment and juvenile firesetting: Correlates and underlying mechanisms. Child Abuse & Neglect, 32, 161–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sakheim, G. A., & Osborn, E. (1986). A psychological profile of juvenile firesetters in residential treatment: A replication study. Child Welfare, 65(5), 495–503.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharp, A., Roe-Sepowitz, D., & Boberg, J. (2009). The interaction between juvenile school fire setting and bullying: An exploratory study. School Social Work Journal, 33(2), 86–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swaffer, T., & Hollin, C. R. (1995). Adolescent firesetting: Why do they say they do it? Journal of Adolescence, 18, 619–623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United States Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation. (2010). Crime in the United States, 2009. Washington, D.C.

  • Vaughn, M. G., Fu, Q., DeLisi, M., Wright, J. P., Beaver, K. M., Perron, B. E., et al. (2010). Prevalence and correlates of fire-setting in the united states: Results from the national epidemiological survey on alcohol and related conditions. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 51, 217–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

A previous version of this manuscript was presented at the 2010 American Society of Criminology annual meeting.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jonathan W. Caudill.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Caudill, J.W., Diamond, B., Trulson, C.R. et al. Sifting Through the Ashes: Processing Arsonists in Juvenile Justice. Am J Crim Just 37, 306–320 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-011-9142-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-011-9142-2

Keywords

Navigation