Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Development and experimental verification of a prognosis model for cuproptosis-related subtypes in HCC

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Hepatology International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Cuproptosis is a recently discovered mechanism of programmed cell death caused by intracellular aggregation of mitochondrial lipoylated proteins and destabilization of iron-sulfur proteins triggered by copper. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a common malignant tumor with a poor prognosis. We aimed to predict the survival of patients with HCC using the cuproptosis-related gene (CRG) expression.

Methods

We analyzed the expression, methylation, and mutation status of CRGs in 538 HCC patients and correlated the date with clinical prognosis. HCC patients were divided into two clusters based on their CRG expression. The relationship between CRGs, risk genes, and the immune microenvironment was analyzed using the CIBERSORT algorithm and the single-cell data analysis method. A cuproptosis risk model was constructed according to the five risk genes using the LASSO COX method. To facilitate the clinical applicability of the proposed risk model, we constructed a nomogram and conducted an antineoplastic drug sensitivity analysis.

Results

Our results suggest that the expression levels of CRGs in HCC are regulated by methylation. The prognoses were significantly different between the patients of the two clusters. The prognostic risk score positively correlated with memory T cell activation and negatively correlated with natural killer (NK) and regulatory T cell activation.

Conclusion

Our findings indicate the involvement of CRG regulation in HCC and provide new insights into prognosis assessment. Drug sensitivity analysis predicted drug candidates for the treatment of patients with different HCC subtypes.

Graphical abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

The datasets analyzed for this study can be found in the TCGA (http://www.cancer.gov/tcga) and GEO (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo).

Code availability

The code data are available from the corresponding author on request.

References

  1. Villanueva A. Hepatocellular carcinoma. N Engl J Med 2019;380(15):1450–1462

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Piñero F, Dirchwolf M, Pessôa MG. Biomarkers in hepatocellular carcinoma: diagnosis, prognosis and treatment response assessment. Cells 2020;9(6):1370

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Tsvetkov P, et al. Copper induces cell death by targeting lipoylated TCA cycle proteins. Science 2022;375(6586):1254–1261

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Bock FJ, Tait SWG. Mitochondria as multifaceted regulators of cell death. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2020;21(2):85–100

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Zischka H, et al. Liver mitochondrial membrane crosslinking and destruction in a rat model of Wilson disease. J Clin Invest 2011;121(4):1508–1518

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Oliveri V. Selective targeting of cancer cells by copper ionophores: an overview. Front Mol Biosci 2022;9: 841814

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Tang D, Chen X, Kroemer G. Cuproptosis: a copper-triggered modality of mitochondrial cell death. Cell Res 2022;32:417–418

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Chandrashekar DS, et al. UALCAN: a portal for facilitating tumor subgroup gene expression and survival analyses. Neoplasia 2017;19(8):649–658

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Papatheodorou I, et al. Expression Atlas update: from tissues to single cells. Nucleic Acids Res 2020;48(D1):D77–D83

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Menyhárt O, Nagy Á, Győrffy B. Determining consistent prognostic biomarkers of overall survival and vascular invasion in hepatocellular carcinoma. R Soc Open Sci 2018;5(12):181006

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Newman AM, et al. Robust enumeration of cell subsets from tissue expression profiles. Nat Methods 2015;12(5):453–457

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Rooney MS, et al. Molecular and genetic properties of tumors associated with local immune cytolytic activity. Cell 2015;160(1–2):48–61

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Iasonos A, et al. How to build and interpret a nomogram for cancer prognosis. J Clin Oncol 2008;26(8):1364–1370

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Xu LX, et al. Genomic and transcriptional heterogeneity of multifocal hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Oncol 2019;30(6):990–997

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Aubert L, et al. Copper bioavailability is a KRAS-specific vulnerability in colorectal cancer. Nat Commun 2020;11(1):3701

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Michniewicz F, et al. Copper: an intracellular achilles’ heel allowing the targeting of epigenetics, kinase pathways, and cell metabolism in cancer therapeutics. ChemMedChem 2021;16(15):2315–2329

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Chen F, et al. Serum copper and zinc levels and the risk of oral cancer: A new insight based on large-scale case-control study. Oral Dis 2019;25(1):80–86

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Saleh SAK, et al. Serum levels of selenium, zinc, copper, manganese, and iron in prostate cancer patients. Curr Urol 2020;14(1):44–49

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Mossmann D, Park S, Hall MN. mTOR signalling and cellular metabolism are mutual determinants in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 2018;18(12):744–757

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Yu M, et al. PLCγ-dependent mTOR signalling controls IL-7-mediated early B cell development. Nat Commun 2017;8(1):1457

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Percival SS. Copper and immunity. Am J Clin Nutr 1998;67(5 Suppl):1064s–1068s

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Djoko KY, et al. The role of copper and zinc toxicity in innate immune defense against bacterial pathogens. J Biol Chem 2015;290(31):18954–18961

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhang Z, et al. Gasdermin E suppresses tumour growth by activating anti-tumour immunity. Nature 2020;579(7799):415–420

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Vivier E, et al. Targeting natural killer cells and natural killer T cells in cancer. Nat Rev Immunol 2012;12(4):239–252

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Kondratova M, et al. A multiscale signalling network map of innate immune response in cancer reveals cell heterogeneity signatures. Nat Commun 2019;10(1):4808

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Ludewig B, et al. Protective antiviral cytotoxic T cell memory is most efficiently maintained by restimulation via dendritic cells. J Immunol 1999;163(4):1839–1844

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Wherry EJ, et al. Lineage relationship and protective immunity of memory CD8 T cell subsets. Nat Immunol 2003;4(3):225–234

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Klebanoff CA, et al. Central memory self/tumor-reactive CD8+ T cells confer superior antitumor immunity compared with effector memory T cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005;102(27):9571–9576

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. van Panhuys N, et al. Effector lymphoid tissue and its crucial role in protective immunity. Trends Immunol 2005;26(5):242–247

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Cao J, et al. Screening and identifying immune-related cells and genes in the tumor microenvironment of bladder urothelial carcinoma: based on TCGA Database and Bioinformatics. Front Oncol 2019;9:1533

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Saito T, et al. Two FOXP3(+)CD4(+) T cell subpopulations distinctly control the prognosis of colorectal cancers. Nat Med 2016;22(6):679–684

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was supported by grants from the Clinical Research Plan of SHDC (SHDC2020CR4018), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81902907 and 81874182) and Shanghai Pujiang Program (2019PJD008).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

WY, WL, ZT: contributed to the conception of the study; WY, ZY, WL: performed the experiment; XW, ZN, ZY: contributed significantly to analysis and manuscript preparation; WY, ZJ: performed the data analyses and wrote the manuscript; XW, ZW: helped perform the analysis with constructive discussions.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Weiping Zhu, Ti Zhang or Lu Wang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that there are no conficts of interest.

Consent for publication

All authors approved the manuscript for publication.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, Y., Zhang, Y., Wang, L. et al. Development and experimental verification of a prognosis model for cuproptosis-related subtypes in HCC. Hepatol Int 16, 1435–1447 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12072-022-10381-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12072-022-10381-0

Keywords

Navigation