Skip to main content
Log in

Towards an operations strategy model of servitization: the role of sustainability pressure

  • Published:
Operations Management Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Servitization requires an important strategic shift to drive changes in the operations of manufacturing firms. Using a large-scale survey, the purpose of this paper is (1) to build and validate an operations strategy model of servitization confirming previous case study findings on servitization as a strategic action and (2) to explore the role of sustainability pressures in, and the sustainability performance effects of, pursuing service-based operations strategies. To reach these objectives, a dataset including the responses of 735 manufacturing plants from 21 different countries is analyzed using the PLS-SEM method. The results indicate that the sustainability pressures of stakeholders can push manufacturers to adopt a service-based operations strategy, materializing in the provision of both basic (product-oriented) and advanced (customer-oriented) services (BAS and ADS). Our analysis further indicates that while offering BAS is a precondition for ADS provision, only ADS can offer a competitive edge for manufacturers, both in terms of service and sustainability-related operational performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adebanjo D, Teh PL, Ahmed PK (2016) The impact of external pressure and sustainable management practices on manufacturing performance and environmental outcomes. Int J Opera Prod Manag 36:995–1013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alves Filho AG, Nogueira E, Bento PEG (2015) Operations strategies of engine assembly plants in the Brazilian automotive industry. Int J Opera Prod Manag 35:817–838

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Annarelli A, Battistella C, Nonino F (2016) Product service system: a conceptual framework from a systematic review. J Clean Prod 139:1011–1032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avella L, Vázquez-Bustelo D (2010) The multidimensional nature of production competence and additional evidence of its impact on business performance. Int J Oper Prod Manag 30:548–583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baines TS, Lightfoot HW, Evans S, Neely A, Greenough R, Peppard J, Roy R, Shehab E, Braganza A, Tiwari A, Alcock JR, Angus JP, Bastl M, Cousens A, Irving P, Johnson M, Kingston J, Lockett H, Martinez V, Michele P, Tranfield D, Walton IM, Wilson H (2007) State-of-the-art in product-service systems. Proc Inst Mech Eng B J Eng Manuf 221:1543–1552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baines TS, Lightfoot HW, Benedettini O, Kay JM (2009a) The servitization of manufacturing: a review of literature and reflection on future challenges. J Manuf Technol Manag 20:547–567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baines TS, Lightfoot HW, Peppard J, Johnson M, Tiwari A, Shehab E, Swink M (2009b) Towards an operations strategy for product-centric servitization. Int J Opera Prod Manag 29:494–519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baines T, W. Lightfoot H (2014) Servitization of the manufacturing firm: exploring the operations practices and technologies that deliver advanced services. Int J Opera Prod Manag 34:2–35

  • Baines T, Bigdeli AZ, Bustinza OF, Shi VG, Baldwin J, Ridgway K (2017) Servitization: revisiting the state-of-the-art and research priorities. Int J Opera Prod Manag 37:256–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benedettini O, Neely A, Swink M (2015) Why do servitized firms fail? A risk-based explanation. Int J Opera Prod Manag 35:946–979

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beuren FH, Ferreira MGG, Miguel PAC (2013) Product-service systems: a literature review on integrated products and services. J Clean Prod 47:222–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyer KK, Lewis MW (2002) Competitive priorities: investigating the need for trade-offs in operations strategy. Prod Oper Manag 11:9–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brax S (2005) A manufacturer becoming service provider–challenges and a paradox. Manag Serv Qual: Int J 15:142–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christiansen T, Berry WL, Bruun P, Ward P (2003) A mapping of competitive priorities, manufacturing practices, and operational performance in groups of Danish manufacturing companies. Int J Opera Prod Manag 23:1163–1183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • da Silveira GJ (2005) Market priorities, manufacturing configuration, and business performance: an empirical analysis of the order-winners framework. J Oper Manag 23:662–675

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dijkstra TK, Henseler J (2015) Consistent partial least squares path modeling. MIS Q 39:297–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson T, Preston LE (1995) The stakeholder theory of the corporation: concepts, evidence, and implications. Acad Manag Rev 20:65–91

  • Eloranta V, Turunen T (2015) Seeking competitive advantage with service infusion: a systematic literature review. J Serv Manag 26:394–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fang E, Palmatier RW, Steenkamp JBE (2008) Effect of service transition strategies on firm value. J Mark 72:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finne M, Holmström J (2013) A manufacturer moving upstream: triadic collaboration for service delivery. Supply Chain Manag: Int J 18:21–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman E (1984) Strategic management: a stakeholder approach. Pitman, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Frohlich MT, Dixon JR (2001) A taxonomy of manufacturing strategies revisited. J Oper Manag 19:541–558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao J, Yao Y, Zhu VC, Sun L, Lin L (2011) Service-oriented manufacturing: a new product pattern and manufacturing paradigm. J Intell Manuf 22:435–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garson GD (2016) Partial least squares: regression and structural equation models. Statistical Associates Publishing, Asheboro, NC

    Google Scholar 

  • Gebauer H, Fleisch E, Friedli T (2005) Overcoming the service paradox in manufacturing companies. Eur Manag J 23:14–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gebauer H, Friedli T, Fleisch E (2006) Success factors for achieving high service revenues in manufacturing companies. Benchmarking: Int J 13:374–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gebauer H (2008) Identifying service strategies in product manufacturing companies by exploring environment–strategy configurations. Ind Mark Manag 37:278–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gebauer H, Fischer T, Fleisch E (2010) Exploring the interrelationship among patterns of service strategy changes and organizational design elements. J Serv Manag 21:103–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelbmann U, Hammerl B (2015) Integrative re-use systems as innovative business models for devising sustainable product–service-systems. J Clean Prod 97:50–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant N, Cadden T, McIvor R, Humphreys P (2013) A taxonomy of manufacturing strategies in manufacturing companies in Ireland. J Manuf Technol Manag 24:488–510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair JFJ, Hult GTM, Ringle C, Sarstedt M (2014) A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes RH, Wheelwright SC (1984) Restoring our competitive edge: competing through manufacturing. Wiley and Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Henseler J, Hubona G, Ray PA (2016) Using PLS path modeling in new technology research: updated guidelines. Indust Manag Data Syst 116:2–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill T (1993) Manufacturing strategy: the strategic management of the manufacturing function. Macmillan, London, UK

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Huxtable J, Schaefer D (2016) On Servitization of the manufacturing industry in the UK. Proc CIRP 52:46–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ketokivi M, Schroeder R (2004) Manufacturing practices, strategic fit and performance: a routine-based view. Int J Opera Prod Manag 24:171–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kindström D (2010) Towards a service-based business model–key aspects for future competitive advantage. Eur Manag J 28:479–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kock N (2015) Common method bias in PLS-SEM: a full collinearity assessment approach. Int J e-Collab 11:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Kock N, Lynn GS (2012) Lateral collinearity and misleading results in variance-based SEM: an illustration and recommendations. J Assoc Inf Syst 13:546–580

    Google Scholar 

  • Koufteros XA, Vonderembse MA, Doll WJ (2002) Examining the competitive capabilities of manufacturing firms. Struct Equ Model Multidiscip J 9:256–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lightfoot H, Baines T, Smart P (2013) The servitization of manufacturing: a systematic literature review of interdependent trends. Int J Opera Prod Manag 33:1408–1434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu N, Roth AV, Rabinovich E (2011) Antecedents and consequences of combinative competitive capabilities in manufacturing. Int J Opera Prod Manag 31:1250–1286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manzini E, Vezzoli C (2003) A strategic design approach to develop sustainable product service systems: examples taken from the ‘environmentally friendly innovation’ Italian prize. J Clean Prod 11:851–857

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinez V, Neely A, Velu C, Leinster-Evans S, Bisessar D (2016) Exploring the journey to services. Int J Prod Econ 192:66–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathieu V (2001a) Product services: from a service supporting the product to a service supporting the client. J Bus Indust Market 16:39–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathieu V (2001b) Service strategies within the manufacturing sector: benefits, costs and partnership. Int J Serv Indust Manag 12:451–475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthyssens P, Vandenbempt K (2010) Service addition as business market strategy: identification of transition trajectories. J Serv Manag 21:693–714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller JG, Roth AV (1994) A taxonomy of manufacturing strategies. Manag Sci 40:285–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg H, Waters JA (1985) Of strategies, deliberate and emergent. Strat Manag J 6:257–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mont OK (2002) Clarifying the concept of product–service system. J Clean Prod 10:237–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neely A (2008) Exploring the financial consequences of the servitization of manufacturing. Oper Manag Res 1:103–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliva R, Kallenberg R (2003) Managing the transition from products to services. Int J Serv Ind Manag 14:160–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pawar KS, Beltagui A, Riedel JC (2009) The PSO triangle: designing product, service and organisation to create value. Int J Opera Prod Manag 29:468–493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee JY, Podsakoff NP (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J Appl Psychol 88:879–903

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn JB, Doorley TL, Paquette PC (1990) Beyond products: services-based strategy. Harv Bus Rev 68:58–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabetino R, Kohtamäki M, Gebauer H (2017) Strategy map of servitization. Int J Prod Econ 192:144–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reim W, Parida V, Sjödin DR (2016) Risk management for product-service system operation. Int J Opera Prod Manag 36:665–686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig ED, Easton GS (2010) Tradeoffs in manufacturing? A meta-analysis and critique of the literature. Prod Oper Manag 19:127–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ringle CM, Sarstedt M, Straub DW (2012) A critical look at the use of PLS-SEM in MIS quarterly. MIS Quarterly 36:3–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Ringle CM, Wende S, Becker JM (2015) SmartPLS 3. SmartPLS, Bönningstedt http://www.smartpls.com. Accessed 03 October 2017

    Google Scholar 

  • Salonen A (2011) Service transition strategies of industrial manufacturers. Ind Mark Manag 40:683–690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarkis J, Gonzalez-Torre P, Adenso-Diaz B (2010) Stakeholder pressure and the adoption of environmental practices: the mediating effect of training. J Oper Manag 28:163–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmenner RW, Vastag G (2006) Revisiting the theory of production competence: extensions and cross-validations. J Oper Manag 24:893–909

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoenherr T, Narasimhan R (2012) The fit between capabilities and priorities and its impact on performance improvement: revisiting and extending the theory of production competence. Int J Prod Res 50:3755–3775

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seuring S, Müller M (2008) From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management. J Clean Prod 16:1699–1710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith L, Maull R, Ng ICL (2014) Servitization and operations management: a service dominant-logic approach. Int J Opera Prod Manag 34:242–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sousa R, da Silveira GJ (2017) Capability antecedents and performance outcomes of servitization: Differences between basic and advanced services. Int J Opera Prod Manag 37:444–467

  • Spring M, Araujo L (2009) Service, services and products: rethinking operations strategy. Int J Oper Prod Manag 29:444–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szász L, Demeter K (2014) How do companies lose orders? A multi-country study of internal inconsistency in operations strategies. Oper Manag Res 7:99–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szász L, Demeter K (2015) Business models along supply chain position and servitisation: an empirical investigation of European manufacturers. Acta Oeconomica 65:367–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szász L, Demeter K, Boer H (2015) Production competence revisited–a critique of the literature and a new measurement approach. J Manuf Technol Manag 26:536–560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szász L, Demeter K, Boer H, Cheng Y (2017) Servitization of manufacturing: the effect of economic context. J Manuf Technol Manag 28:1011–1034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tukker A (2004) Eight types of product–service system: eight ways to sustainability? Experiences from SusProNet Business. Strat Environ 13:246–260

  • Turunen TT, Toivonen M (2011) Organizing customer-oriented service business in manufacturing. Oper Manag Res 4:74–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulaga W, Reinartz WJ (2011) Hybrid offerings: how manufacturing firms combine goods and services successfully. J Mark 75:5–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voss CA (2005) Paradigms of manufacturing strategy re-visited. Int J Opera Prod Manag 25:1223–1227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward PT, Duray R (2000) Manufacturing strategy in context: environment, competitive strategy and manufacturing strategy. J Opera Manag 18:123–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward PT, McCreery JK, Anand G (2007) Business strategies and manufacturing decisions: an empirical examination of linkages. Int J Opera Prod Manag 27:951–973

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams A (2006) Product-service systems in the automotive industry: the case of micro-factory retailing. J Clean Prod 14:172–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wise R, Baumgartner P (1999) Go downstream: the new imperative in manufacturing. Harv Bus Rev 77:133–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao X, Sum CC, Qi Y, Zhang H, Lee TS (2006) A taxonomy of manufacturing strategies in China. J Oper Manag 24:621–636

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Levente Szász.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 7 Indirect effects between model constructs
Table 8 Total effects between model constructs

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Szász, L., Seer, L. Towards an operations strategy model of servitization: the role of sustainability pressure. Oper Manag Res 11, 51–66 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12063-018-0132-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12063-018-0132-0

Keywords

Navigation