Abstract
Purpose
Very few reports elaborate on the changes in P wave following superior septal approach to the mitral valve. We aimed to describe the changes in the P wave axis and other electrocardiographic changes following this approach among patients preoperatively in sinus rhythm.
Methods
We did a retrospective review of medical records among all our patients undergoing superior septal approach for mitral valve surgery from September 2014 to September 2019. Electrocardiograms during hospital stay and until 6-month follow-up were analyzed. A deviation in P wave axis from the normal range of + 30 to + 60° was classified as ectopic atrial rhythm.
Results
In the study population of 47 patients (age 16–75 years, 51.3 ± 13.6 years; M:F ratio 3.7:1), who were in normal sinus rhythm preoperatively, 34 patients (72.3%) had a visible P wave on electrocardiogram (ECG) at discharge. Among them, the P wave axes of 17 patients (36.2%) were within normal range (normal sinus rhythm), whereas 17 patients (36.2%) had ectopic atrial rhythm at discharge. The most frequent abnormal P wave axis was between 0 and − 30° (12 patients). At 6 months, 8 patients (17.0%) had a persistent ectopic atrial rhythm. These patients underwent a Holter test at 6 months and were followed up for symptomatic bradycardia for 3 years. None of the patients with ectopic atrial rhythm required pacemaker insertion.
Conclusion
Persistence of ectopic atrial rhythm at 6 months is common (17%) after superior septal approach. Documentation of P wave axis after this approach will help avoid missing it. These patients may be kept on follow-up to look for symptomatic bradycardia.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request, after permission from Sree Chitra Tirunal institute of Medical Sciences, Thiruvananthapuram, India.
References
Alfieri O, Sandrelli L, Pardini A, Fucci C, Zogno M, Ferrari M, Caradonna E. Optimal exposure of the mitral valve through an extended vertical transeptal approach. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1991;5:294–9.
Takeshita M, Furuse A, Kotsuka Y, Kubota H. Sinus node function after mitral valve surgery via the transseptal superior approach. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1997;12:341–4.
Gaudino M, Alessandrini F, Glieca F, Martinelli L, Santarelli P, Bruno P, et al. Conventional left atrial versus superior septal approach for mitral valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg. 1997;63:1123–7.
Boulemden A, Nadarajah D, Szafranek A, Richens D. Atrial approaches to the mitral valve: is there a difference in postoperative rhythm disturbance and permanent pacemaker implantation? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2018;27:536–42.
García-Villarreal OA, González-Oviedo R, Rodríguez-González H, Martínez-Chapa HD. Superior septal approach for mitral valve surgery: a word of caution. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2003;24:862–7.
Aydin E, Arslan A, Ozkokeli M. Comparison of superior septal approach with left atriotomy in mitral valve surgery. Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc. 2014;29:367–73.
Utley JR, Leyland SA, Nguyenduy T. Comparison of outcomes with three atrial incisions for mitral valve operations. Right lateral, superior septal, and transseptal. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1995;109:582–7.
Smith CR. Septal-superior exposure of the mitral valve: the transplant approach. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1992;103:623–8.
Guiraudon GM, Ofiesh JG, Kaushik R. Extended vertical transatrial septal approach to the mitral valve. Ann Thorac Surg. 1991;52:1058–60.
Nguyen HU. Improved combined superior-transseptal approach to the mitral valve. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2009;17:171–4.
Berreklouw E, Ercan H, Schönberger JP. Combined superior-transseptal approach to the left atrium. Ann Thorac Surg. 1991;51:293–5.
Sealy WC, Bache RJ, Seaber AV, Bhattacharga SK. The atrial pacemaking site after surgical exclusion of the sinoatrial node. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1973;65:841–50.
Lazzeroni D, Bini M, Camaiora U, Castiglioni P, Moderato L, Ugolotti PT, et al. Predictive role of P-wave axis abnormalities in secondary cardiovascular prevention. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2017;24:1994–9.
Shin H, Yozu R, Higashi S, Kawada S. Sinus node function after mitral valve surgery using the superior septal approach. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;71:587–90.
Masiello P, Triumbari F, Leone R, Itri F, Del Negro G, Di Benedetto G. Extended vertical transseptal approach versus conventional left atriotomy for mitral valve surgery. J Heart Valve Dis. 1999;8:440–4.
Kumar N, Saad E, Prabhakar G, De Vol E, Duran CM. Extended transseptal versus conventional left atriotomy: early postoperative study. Ann Thorac Surg. 1995;60:426–30.
Tenpaku H, Wariishi S, Kanemitsu N, Okabe M, Nakamura T. Combined superior-transseptal approach versus conventional approach for mitral valve surgery. Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2000;48:688–92.
Masuda M, Tominaga R, Kawachi Y, et al. Postoperative cardiac rhythms with superior-septal approach and lateral approach to the mitral valve. Ann Thorac Surg. 1996;62:1118–22.
Lukac P, Hjortdal VE, Pedersen AK, Mortensen PT, Jensen HK, Hansen PS. Superior transseptal approach to mitral valve is associated with a higher need for pacemaker implantation than the left atrial approach. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;83:77–82.
Kusumoto FM, Schoenfeld MH, Barrett C, Edgerton JR, Ellenbogen KA, Gold MR, et al. 2018 ACC/AHA/HRS guideline on the evaluation and management of patients with bradycardia and cardiac conduction delay: executive summary: a report of the American college of cardiology/American heart association task force on clinical practice guidelines, and the heart rhythm society. Circulation. 2019;140:e333–81.
Acknowledgements
Dr Biju Soman MD, Dr Gurpreet Singh MD, Dr Biju George MD, Dr Vincy Sabu MD, Jayakumar, for help with statistical analysis.
Funding
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection, and analysis were performed by Atul Abraham. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Atul Abraham and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
Approval was obtained from the Ethics Committee at SCTIMST, which waived the need for patient consent.
Informed Consent
Waived off by the Ethics Committee as no patient identifying material was used.
Statement on human and animal rights
There was no infringement of human or animal rights in this study.
Conflict of interest
The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the contents of this article.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Abraham, A., Panicker, V.T., Mohanan Nair, K.K. et al. Ectopic atrial rhythm after superior septal approach to the mitral valve — an often under-reported entity. Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 39, 340–349 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12055-022-01471-7
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12055-022-01471-7