Skip to main content
Log in

Parental balanced chromosomal rearrangement leading to major genomic imbalance and an autosomal trisomy resulting in consecutive pregnancy loss: a case report

  • Research Note
  • Published:
Journal of Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Chromosomal aberrations such as parental balanced translocation contribute to a significant proportion of recurrent pregnancy losses. These have extreme genetic implications on the foetus which can either cause physical and/or mental retardation or early death. In this study, we report a unique clinical case of a couple with three consecutive pregnancy losses and we aim to determine the genetic abnormalities causing the miscarriages. Conventional cytogenetic and molecular genetic analysis were performed on the products of conception as well as for the parents. Chromosomal analysis was performed based on the ISCN 2016 guidelines. This was followed by Chromosomal microarray analysis carried out using ISCA consortium probe set (8X60K). Genetic testing for the 1st product of conception was not performed. However, the 2nd and 3rd products of conception indicated an autosomal trisomy 22 and a 3.7 Mb deletion of 2p (cytoband p25.3) along with 13.6 Mb duplication of 16p (cytoband p13.3p13.12), respectively. The paternal karyotype was normal but mother showed a balanced translocation 46,XX,t(2;16)(p25.3;p13.3). This was parallel to the products of conception microarray findings, unbalanced chromosomal abnormality in the foetus. Balanced translocation carriers are susceptible for meiotic nondisjunction processes and early detection of genetic anomalies can be informative to parents trying to conceive. Genetic analysis of the abortus after the 1st loss can be helpful to understand the cause of miscarriage. A combined approach with microarray and karyotyping of the products of conception can be important to determine the specific aberrations in the foetal chromosomes leading to abortion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4

References

  • Choi T. Y., Lee H. M., Park W. K., Jeong S. Y. and Moon H. S. 2014 Spontaneous abortion and recurrent miscarriage: a comparison of cytogenetic diagnosis in 250 cases. Obstet. Gynecol. Sci. 57, 518–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De P., Chakravarty S. and Chakravarty A. 2015 Novel balanced chromosomal translocations in females with recurrent spontaneous abortions: two case studies. J. Hum. Reprod. Sci. 8, 114–117.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Digilio M. C., Bernardini L., Capalbo A., Capolino R., Gagliardi M. G., Marino B. et al. 2009 16p subtelomeric duplication: a clinically recognizable syndrome. Eur. J. Med. Genet. 17, 1135–1140.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Flynn H., Yan J., Saravelos S. H. and Li T. C. 2014 Comparison of reproductive outcome, including the pattern of loss, between couples with chromosomal abnormalities and those with unexplained repeated miscarriages. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res. 40, 109–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner R. J. M., Sutherland G. R. and Shaffer L. G. 2012 Chromosome abnormalities and genetic counseling, 4th edition. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghazaey S., Keify F., Mirzaei F., Maleki M., Tootian S., Ahadian M. and Abbaszadegan M. R. 2015 Chromosomal analysis of couples with repeated spontaneous abortions in Northeastern Iran. Int. J. Fertil. Steril. 9, 47–54.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Jobanputra V., Sobrino A., Kinney A., Kline J. and Warburton D. 2002 Multiplex interphase fish as a screen for common aneuploidies in spontaneous abortions. Hum. Reprod. 17, 1166–1170.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kunwar F. and Bakshi S. R. 2016 Familial constitutional rearrangement of chromosomes 4 & 8: phenotypically normal mother and abnormal progeny. J. Clin. Diagn. Res. 10, Gd01–Gd04.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Levy B., Sigurjonsson S., Pettersen B., Maisenbacher M. K., Hall M. P., Demko Z. et al. 2014 Genomic imbalance in products of conception: single-nucleotide polymorphism chromosomal microarray analysis. Obstet. Gynecol. 124, 202–209.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mackie Ogilvie C. and Scriven P. N. 2004 Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) for reciprocal translocations. Prenat. Diagn. 24, 553–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pourjafari B., Pour-Jafari H., Farimani M., Ghahramani S. and Saleh E. K. 2012 Genetic counseling in carriers of reciprocal translocations involving two autosomes. Indian J. Hum. Genet. 18, 250–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pylyp L. Y., Spynenko L. O., Verhoglyad N. V., Mishenko A. O., Mykytenko D. O. and Zukin V. D. 2018 Chromosomal abnormalities in products of conception of first-trimester miscarriages detected by conventional cytogenetic analysis: a review of 1000 cases. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 35, 265–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadler T. W. and Langman J. 2011 Langman’s medical embryology, 12th edition. Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheth F. J., Liehr T., Kumari P., Akinde R., Sheth H. J. and Sheth J. J. 2013 Chromosomal abnormalities in couples with repeated fetal loss: an Indian retrospective study. Indian J. Hum. Genet. 19, 415–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sierra S. and Stephenson M. 2006 Genetics of recurrent pregnancy loss. Semin. Reprod. Med. 24, 17–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stern C., Pertile M., Norris H., Hale L. and Baker H. 1999 Chromosome translocations in couples with in-vitro fertilization implantation failure. Hum. Reprod. 14, 2097–2101.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • van den Berg M. M., van Maarle M. C., van Wely M. and Goddijn M. 2012 Genetics of early miscarriage. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Basis Dis. 1822, 1951–1959.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu X., Li J., Zhu Y., Wang W., Wu X., Yang Y., Gu L. et al. 2018 Application of chromosomal microarray analysis in products of miscarriage. Mol. Cytogenet. 11, 44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors acknowledge support from Advanced Genomics Institute and Laboratory Medicine, AGILE, New Delhi. Authors are grateful to the patients for the kind support and consent for the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sonal R. Bakshi.

Additional information

Corresponding editor: B. K. Thelma

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shrivastava, A., Thakur, S., Nath, T. et al. Parental balanced chromosomal rearrangement leading to major genomic imbalance and an autosomal trisomy resulting in consecutive pregnancy loss: a case report. J Genet 100, 54 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12041-021-01304-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12041-021-01304-3

Keywords

Navigation