Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of RF power and gas flow ratio on the growth and morphology of the PECVD SiC thin film s for MEMS applications

  • Published:
Bulletin of Materials Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Low temperature PECVD (Plasma Enhanced Chemical Vapour Deposition) deposited SiC thin films are promising materials for development of high temperature working MEMS (Microelectromechanical System) due to their excellent mechanical properties, non-corrosive nature and ability to withstand high temperature. However, the surface roughness of such thin films is the main obstacle to achieve thicker thin films for MEMS applications as the surface more rougher by increasing the thickness of PECVD SiC thin films. Therefore, in this present study, thicker SiC thin films were deposited by PECVD process by using the CH4 and SiH4 as the precursor gases in presence of Ar as the carrier gas and two process parameters i.e. RF (Radio Frequency) power with mixed frequency condition and flow ratio of silane to methane were varied by keeping the temperature and pressure constant to investigate the influence of these parameters on the growth rate, surface roughness and morphology of SiC thin films. It was observed that both the RF power (with the mixed frequency condition) and flow ratio of SiH4/CH4 can control the growth rate, surface roughness and morphology of the PECVD SiC thin films. Higher the carbon content in the thin films the surface became more smoother whereas the surface became for rougher by increasing the RF power.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Azevedo R G, Jones D G, Jog A V, Myers D R, Chen L, Fu X, Mehregany M, Wijesundara M B J and Pisano A P 2007 IEEE Sens. J. 7 568

  2. Wu C, Zorman C A and Mehregany M 2006 IEEE Sens. J. 6 316

  3. Roy S, DeAnna R G, Zorman C A and Mehregany M 2002 IEEE Trans. Electron. Devices 49 2323

  4. Liu L, Tang W, Zheng B and Zhang H 2011 Proceedings of the 2011 6th IEEE international conference on nano/microengineered and molecular systems, February 20–23, Kaohsiung, Taiwan, p 146

  5. El Khalfi A, El Maati Ech-chamikh, Ijdiyaou Y, Azizan M, Essafti A, Nkhaili L and Outzourhit A 2014 Spectrosch. Lett.: Int. J. Rapid Commun. 47 392

  6. Chandra S, Kumar S and Bose G 2012 J. Micromech. Microeng. 22 025010

  7. Sarro P 2000 Sens. Actuators 82 210

  8. Zorman C A, Rajgopal S, Fu X A, Jezeski R, Melzak J and Mehregany M 2002 Electrochem. Solid-State Lett. 5 99

  9. Fu X, Dunning J L, Zorman C A and Mehregany M 2005 Sens. Actuators A 119 169

  10. Liu F, Carraro C, Pisano A P and Maboudian R 2010 J. Micromech. Microeng. 20 035011

  11. Pelegrini M V, Rehder G P and Pereyra I 2010 Phys. Status Solidi C 7 786

  12. Guo H, Wang Y, Chen S, Zhang G, Zhang H and Li Z 2006 Proceedings of the 1st IEEE international conference on nano/microengineered and molecular systems, January 18–21, Zhuhai, China

  13. Ricciardi C, Primiceli A, Germani G, Rusconi A and Giorgis F 2006 J. Non-Cryst. Solids 352 1380

  14. Huran J, Hotovy I, Kobzev A P and Balalykin N I 2004 Thin Solid Films 459 149

  15. Milan P, Vladimír S, Miroslav M, Jozef H and Juraj O 2011 34th international spring seminar on electronics technology (ISSE), 11–15 May, Tratanska Lomnica

  16. Prado R J, Fantini M C A, Tabacnils M H, Cardoso C A V, Pereyra I and Flank A M 2001 J. Non-Cryst. Solids 283 1

  17. Kunle M, Janz S, Nickel K G and Eibl O 2011 Phys. Status Solidi A 208 1885

  18. Kim Y, Cho S, Hong B, Suh S, Jang G and Yoon D 2002 Mater. Trans. 43 2058

  19. Awad Y, El Khakani M A, Brassard D, Smirani R, Camiré N, Lessard M, Aktik C, Scarlete M and Mouine J 2010 Thin Solid Films 518 2738

  20. Avram M, Avram A, Bragaru1 A, Chen B, Poenar D and Iliescu C 2010 Semiconductor conference (CAS), international (Vol. 01), 11–13 October

  21. Hua Z, Liao X, Diao H, Kong G, Zeng X and Xu Y 2004 J. Cryst. Growth 264 7

  22. Oliveira A R and Carreno M N P 2006 J. Non-Cryst. Solids 352 1392

  23. Kaneko T, Nemoto D, Horiguchi A and Miyakawa N 2005 J. Cryst. Growth 275 1097

  24. Mernagh V A, Kelly T C, Ahern M, Kennedy A D, Adriaansen A P M, Ramaekers P P J, McDonnell L and Koekoek R 1991 Surf. Coat. Technol. 49 462

  25. Mastelaro V, Flank A M, Fantini M C A, Bittencourt D R S, Carreno M N P and Pereyra I 1996 J. Appl. Phys. 79 1324

  26. Rava P, Crovini G, Demichelis F, Giorgis F and Pirri C F 1996 J. Appl. Phys. 80 4116

Download references

Acknowledgements

The financial support was provided by ADA: NP-MASS under Grant no. 1.27 to carry out this work. The PECVD depositions were carried out at CeNSE, IISc Bangalore. We would like to thank the clean room manager Dr Raghavan and Aditi for their clean room assistance during the depositions of samples.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to RAJ KISHORA DASH.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

PERI, B., BORAH, B. & DASH, R.K. Effect of RF power and gas flow ratio on the growth and morphology of the PECVD SiC thin film s for MEMS applications. Bull Mater Sci 38, 1105–1112 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12034-015-0881-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12034-015-0881-4

Keywords

Navigation