Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Ampelometric Leaf Trait and SSR Loci Selection for a Multivariate Statistical Approach in Vitis vinifera L. Biodiversity Management

  • Research
  • Published:
Molecular Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

High estimated heritability values were recently revealed for mature leaf traits in grape (Vitis vinifera L.), thus redeeming ampelography in the era of molecular markers. The “Organisation Internationale de la Vigne et du Vin (OIV)” set a list of hundreds of descriptors for grapevine in order to standardize ampelographic and ampelometric scores. Therefore, the selection and reduction of the number of OIV codes can represent a major goal for leaner biodiversity assessment studies. The identification of ampelometric traits associated with grape diversity allows to construct Classification Trees with chi squared automatic interaction detection (CHAID) algorithm, a stepwise model-fitting method that produces a tree diagram in which at each step the sample pool is splitted based on the independent variables statistically different for the dependent variable. A collection of 100 table and wine grapevines (Vitis vinifera L.) was characterized and evaluated by means of six microsatellites and twenty-two ampelometric traits on mature leaves. Nine ampelometric traits were selected by principal component analysis and employed to build the classification trees based on CHAID algorithm. The strategy can represent an effective tool for grape biodiversity management, right allocations, and identification of new grape genotypes, implemented by a further microsatellite investigation only when unsolved cases occur, allowing faster and cheaper results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sefc, K. M., Lefort, F., Grando, M. S., Scott, K., Steinkellner, H., & Thomas, M. R. (2001). Microsatellite markers for grapevine: a state of the art. In K. A. Roubelakis-Angelakis (Ed.), Molecular biology and biotechnology of grapevine (pp. 407–438). Amsterdam: Kluwer Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chitwood, D. H., et al. (2014). A modern ampelography: a genetic basis for leaf shape and venation patterning in grape. Plant Physiology, 164, 259–272.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. OIV (2009). Second edition of the OIV descriptor list for grape varieties and Vitis species. Organisation Internationale de la Vigne et du Vin, Paris, France - International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Rome (www.oiv.org).

  4. Santiago, J. L., Boso, S., Martin, J. P., Ortiz, J. M., & Martinez, M. C. (2005). Characterization and identification of grapevine cultivars (Vitis vinifera L.) from Northwestern Spain using microsatellite markers and ampelometric methods. Vitis, 44(2), 67–72.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Preiner, D., Safner, T., Karoglan Kontić, J., Marković, Z., Šimon, S., & Maletić, E. (2014). Analysis of phyllometric parameters efficiency in discrimination of Croatian native V. vinifera cultivars. Vitis, 53(4), 215–217.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Galet, P. (1988). Cépages et vignobles de Frances (pp. 9–17). Montpellier: Dèhan.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Tomažič, I., & Korošec-Koruza, Z. (2003). Validity of phyllometric parameters used to differentiate local Vitis vinifera L. cultivars. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 50, 773–778.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Alba, V., Bergamini, C., Cardone, M. F., Gasparro, M., Perniola, R., Genghi, R., & Antonacci, D. (2014). Morphological variability in leaves and molecular characterization of novel table grape candidate cultivars (Vitis vinifera L.). Molecular Biotechnology, 54(3), 1021–1030.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kass, G. V. (1980). An exploratory technique for investigating large quantities of categorical data. Journal Applied Statistics, 29(2), 119–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mardia, K. V. (1970). Measures of multivariate skewness and kurtosis with applications. Biometrika, 57, 519–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Doornik J.A., H. Hansen (1994). An omnibus test for univariate and multivariate normality. Working Paper, Nuffield College, University of Oxford.

  12. Fernandez-Gonzalez, M., Mena, A., Izquierdo, P., & Martinez, J. (2007). Genetic characterization of grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) cultivars from Castilla La Mancha (Spain) using microsatellite markers. Vitis, 46(3), 126–130.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Carimi, F., Mercati, F., Abbate, L., & Sunseri, F. (2010). Microsatellite analysis for evaluation of genetic diversity among Sicilian grapevine cultivars. Genetic Resources Crop Evolution, 57, 703–719.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Cipriani, G., et al. (2010). The SSR-based molecular profile of 1005 grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) accessions uncovers new synonymy and parentages, and reveals a large admixture amongst varieties of different geographic origin. Theoretical Applied Genetics, 121(8), 1569–1585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Olmo, H. P. (1976). Grapes. In N. W. Simmonds (Ed.), Evolution of Crop Plants (pp. 294–298). London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ruffo Roberto S., A.M. de Assis, L.Y. Yamamoto, A.J. Sato, R. Koyama, W.S. Borges, W. Genta, W. Iwai (2013). “Black Star” and “Haruna”: new natural table grape mutations in Brazil. In: XIV Congreso Latinoamericano de Viticoltura y Enologia, 20 – 22 Noviembre, Tarija, Bolivia. Retrieved 10 Nov, 2014 from http://congresolatinoamericano.bo.

  17. Kobayashi, S., Goto-Yamamoto, N., & Hirochika, H. (2004). Retrotransposon-induced mutations in grape skin color. Science, 304, 982.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Vouillamoz, J. F., & Arnold, C. (2009). Etude historico-génétique de l’origine du ‘Chasselas’. Revue suisse Viticulture Arboriculture Horticulture, 41(5), 299–307.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Meredith, C. P., Bowers, J. E., Riaz, S., Handley, V., Bandman, E. B., & Dangl, G. S. (1999). The identity and parentage of the variety known in California as Petite Sirah. American Journal Enology and Viticulture, 50, 236–242.

    Google Scholar 

  20. This, P., et al. (2004). Development of a standard set of microsatellite reference alleles for identification of grape cultivars. Theoretical Applied Genetics, 109, 1448–1458.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Blaich, R., Konradi, J., Rühl, E., & Forneck, A. (2007). Assessing genetic variation among Pinot noir (Vitis vinifera L) clones with AFLP markers. American Journal Enology and Viticulture, 58(4), 526–529.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Stenkamp, S. H. G., Becker, M. S., Hill, B. H. E., Blaich, R., & Forneck, A. (2009). Clonal variation and stability assay of chimeric Pinot Meunier (Vitis vinifera L) and descending sports. Euphytica, 165, 197–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Alba, V., Anaclerio, A., Gasparro, M., Caputo, A. R., Montemurro, C., Blanco, A., & Antonacci, D. (2011). Ampelographic and molecular characterization of Aglianico accessions (Vitis vinifera L.) collected in Southern-Italy. South African Journal Enology Viticulture, 32(2), 164–173.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Meneghetti, S., Costacurta, A., Bavaresco, L., & Calo’, A. (2013). Genetic variability and geographic typicality of Italian former Prosecco grape variety using PCR-derived molecular markers. Molecular Biotechnology, 56(5), 408–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Naftulin, I. S., & Rebrova, O. Y. (2010). Application of C&RT, CHAID, C4.5 and Wizewhy algorithms for stroke type diagnosis. In L. Rutkowski (Ed.), ICAISC 2010. Part I, LNAI 6113 (pp. 651–656). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Byrd, E. T., & Gustke, L. (2007). Using decision trees to identify tourism stakeholders: the case of two Eastern North Carolina counties. Tourism and Hospitality Research, 7(3–4), 176–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ehrler D. and T. Lehmann (2007). Responder profiling with CHAID and dependency analysis. Lehrstuhl fur Wirtschafts und Sozialstatistik Friederich—Schriller- Universitat Jena. Carl-Zeiss-Str. 3, 07743 Jena.

  28. Driouchi A. and A. Baijou (2009). Interdependencies of health, education & poverty in Egypt, Morocco and Turkey using demographic and health survey. Munich Personal RePEc Archive (MPRA) No. 21409. Retrieved Nov 10, 2014 from http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/21409.

  29. Podgorelec, V., Kokol, P., Stiglic, B., & Rozman, I. (2002). Decision trees: an overview and their use in medicine. Journal Medical Systems, 26(5), 445–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Herrera, C. B., & Schubert, L. (2003). The estimation of biodiversity and the characterization of the dynamics: an application to the study of a pest. Revista De Matematica E Estatistica São Paulo, 21(3), 85–98.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Sowa, S. P., Gust, A., Morey, M. E., & Garringer, A. (2008). Improving Predicted Distribution Models for Riverine Species: An Example from Nebraska. Paper: Publications of the US Geological Survey. 27.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Tarkhnishvili, D., Serbinova, I., & Gavashelishvili, A. (2009). Modelling the range of Syrian spadefoot toad (Pelobates syriacus) with combination of GIS-based approaches. Amphibia-Reptilia, 30, 401–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Pande, S., Pawashe, A., Mahajan, M. N., Mahabal, A., Yosef, R., & Dahanukar, N. (2011). Biometry based ageing of nestling Indian Spotted Owlets (Athene brama brama). ZooKeys, 132, 75–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Antipov E., and E. Pokryshevskaya (2009) Applying CHAID for logistic regression diagnostics and classification accuracy improvement. Munich Personal RePEc Archive (MPRA) No. 21499.Retrieved Nov 10, 2014 from http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/21499/.

  35. Magidson J. (1993). SPSS for Windows CHAID Release 6.0, SPSS Inc., Chicago.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Consiglio per la Ricerca in Agricoltura e l’Analisi dell’Economia Agraria, Unità di ricerca per l’uva da tavola e la vitivinicoltura in ambiente mediterraneo, Via Casamassima 148, 70010, Turi, BA, Italy

    Vittorio Alba, Carlo Bergamini, Rosalinda Genghi, Marica Gasparro, Rocco Perniola & Donato Antonacci

Authors
  1. Vittorio Alba
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Carlo Bergamini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Rosalinda Genghi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Marica Gasparro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Rocco Perniola
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Donato Antonacci
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Donato Antonacci.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (XLS 113 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alba, V., Bergamini, C., Genghi, R. et al. Ampelometric Leaf Trait and SSR Loci Selection for a Multivariate Statistical Approach in Vitis vinifera L. Biodiversity Management. Mol Biotechnol 57, 709–719 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12033-015-9862-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12033-015-9862-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation