Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Phase I/II randomised study of a novel erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (AMG 114) for the treatment of anaemia with concomitant chemotherapy in patients with non-myeloid malignancies

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Medical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

AMG 114 is a novel, hyperglycosylated erythropoiesis-stimulating agent. In preclinical studies, AMG 114 demonstrated increased potency and longer half-life than darbepoetin alfa and epoetin alfa. This phase I/II, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-escalation study evaluated safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of AMG 114 in patients with non-myeloid malignancies and chemotherapy-induced anaemia. Patients were randomised (1:5) to receive subcutaneous placebo or AMG 114 Q3W for 6 weeks in 3 dose cohorts of 15 μg (cohort A1), 50 μg (cohort A2), or 200 μg (cohort A3). Safety endpoints included incidence of adverse events and dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs). The PK profile of AMG 114 was evaluated. Efficacy was assessed by change in haemoglobin from baseline to end of treatment. Forty-eight patients enrolled: 8 received placebo, 40 received AMG 114. No DLTs were observed; adverse events were consistent with underlying malignancies. The PK profile was dose-proportional over the dose range tested; terminal half-life of AMG 114 was approximately 130 h. Mean change (range) in haemoglobin from baseline in AMG 114-treated patients was −0.16 (−1.8 to 1.3), 0.21 (−1.5 to 3.4), and 0.76 (−1.0 to 2.9) g/dl in cohorts A1, A2, and A3, respectively. AMG 114 appeared to be well tolerated, but the study was halted, in part because of modest efficacy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Egrie JC, et al. Characterization and biological effects of recombinant human erythropoietin. Immunobiology. 1986;172:213–24.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Egrie JC, Dwyer E, Browne JK, Hitz A, Lykos MA. Darbepoetin alfa has a longer circulating half-life and greater in vivo potency than recombinant human erythropoietin. Exp Hematol. 2003;31:290–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Egrie JC, Browne JK. Development and characterization of novel erythropoiesis stimulating protein (NESP). Br J Cancer. 2001;84(Suppl 1):3–10.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ludwig H, et al. Pooled analysis of individual patient-level data from all randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of darbepoetin alfa in the treatment of patients with chemotherapy-induced anemia. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:2838–47.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bohlius J, et al. Recombinant human erythropoiesis-stimulating agents and mortality in patients with cancer: a meta-analysis of randomised trials. Lancet. 2009;373:1532–42.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Aranesp® (darbepoetin alfa) prescribing information, Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Amgen Inc.; 2010.

  7. Procrit® (epoetin alfa) prescribing information, Bridgewater, New Jersey: Ortho Biotech Products LP; 2010.

  8. European Medicines Agency. Questions and answers on epoetins and the risk of tumour growth and blood clots in the veins, 26 June 2008. Available at http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Medicine_QA/2009/11/WC500015145.pdf. Accessed 16 Sep 2010.

  9. Beveridge RA, et al. Impact of long-acting growth factors on practice dynamics and patient satisfaction. Pharmacotherapy. 2003;23:101S–9S.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Houts AC, Loh GA, Fortner BV, Kallich JD. Patient and caregiver time burden associated with anaemia treatment in different patient populations. Support Care Cancer. 2006;14:1195–204.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Schwartzberg L, et al. A multicenter retrospective cohort study of practice patterns and clinical outcomes of the use of darbepoetin alfa and epoetin alfa for chemotherapy-induced anemia. Clin Ther. 2003;25:2781–96.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Herrington JD, et al. Utilization of darbepoetin alfa and epoetin alfa for chemotherapy-induced anemia. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2005;62:54–62.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Morrison VA, et al. Observational study of the prevalence of febrile neutropenia in patients who received filgrastim or pegfilgrastim associated with 3–4 weeks chemotherapy regimens in community oncology practices. J Manag Care Pharm. 2007;13:337–48.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Glaspy J, et al. Effects of chemotherapy on endogenous erythropoietin levels and the pharmacokinetics and erythropoietic response of darbepoetin alfa: a randomised clinical trial of synchronous versus asynchronous dosing of darbepoetin alfa. Eur J Cancer. 2005;41:1140–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Elliott S, et al. Evaluation of hyperglycosylated erythropoiesis stimulating proteins developed using glycoengineering. Proc Amer Assoc Cancer Res. 2006;47 (Abstract 2176).

  16. Elliott S, et al. Control of rHuEPO biological activity: the role of carbohydrate. Exp Hematol. 2004;32:1146–55.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Canon JL, et al. Randomized, double-blind, active-controlled trial of every-3-week darbepoetin alfa for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced anemia. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006;98:273–84.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Vansteenkiste J, et al. Double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized phase III trial of darbepoetin alfa in lung cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002;94:1211–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the patients and their families for participation in the study and the clinical study staff at all participating institutions. We also wish to thank Julia R. Gage, PhD, for writing assistance on behalf of Amgen Inc. The Source of support is Amgen Inc.

Conflict of interest

Richard de Boer, Gabor Renczes, Jana Prausova, Norbert Marschner, and Michael Hedenus have no conflicts to disclose. Michael Clemens received financial support from Amgen for documentation of the study data. Dusan Kotasek has received honoraria from Roche Australia and research funding from Amgen, Roche, Cougar Pharmaceuticals, Sanofi-Aventis, Wyeth, and Pfizer. Sameer Doshi and Lisa Hendricks are employees and shareholders of Amgen Inc. Anders C. Österborg has received honoraria for lectures at symposia sponsored by Amgen.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard de Boer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

de Boer, R., Clemens, M., Renczes, G. et al. Phase I/II randomised study of a novel erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (AMG 114) for the treatment of anaemia with concomitant chemotherapy in patients with non-myeloid malignancies. Med Oncol 28, 1210–1217 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-010-9725-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-010-9725-7

Keywords

Navigation