Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Ethical Dilemmas Linked to Fragile X Testing of Minors—a Preliminary Survey Among Professionals

  • Published:
Journal of Molecular Neuroscience Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Asymptomatic female carriers of the FMR1 premutation at childbearing age have been mostly identified through prenatal genetic testing, which is routinely proposed in Israel. During the last few years, a premutation phenotype in males and females has been defined—FXAND, including neuropsychiatric disorder, learning difficulties, endocrine dysfunction, and premature ovarian failure. So when a family at risk is identified, should individuals be tested for premutation even if minors? In order to understand what professionals’ views are with regard to testing FMR1 premutation in minors, we performed a questionnaire testing both ethical attitudes and knowledge. Eighty-two percent of professionals would positively consider fragile X testing in minors, and an additional 15.4% would consider it in boys only. The specific phenotype of full mutation is recognized well by health professionals, while the premutation phenotype is not well known. There is a need to expand awareness on the fragile X premutation phenotype through better information. Testing of fragile X premutation status in minors should be considered, when at risk due to family history.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen EG, Sullivan AK, Marcus M, Small C, Dominguez C, Epstein MP et al (2007) Examination of reproductive aging milestones among women who carry the FMR1 premutation. Hum Reprod 22(8):2142–2152

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey DB Jr, Skinner D, Davis AM, Whitmarsh I, Powell C (2008) Ethical, legal, and social concerns about expanded newborn screening: fragile X syndrome as a prototype for emerging issues. Pediatrics 121(3)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey DB Jr, Hatton DD, Tassone F, Skinner M, Taylor AK (2001) Variability in FMRP and early development in males with fragile X syndrome. Am J Ment Retard 106(1):16–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey DB, Berry-Kravis E, Gane LW, Guarda S, Hagerman R, Powell CM et al (2017) Fragile X newborn screening: lessons learned from a multisite screening study. Pediatrics 139(Supplement 3):S216–S225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry-Kravis E, Abrams L, Coffey SM, Hall DA, Greco C, Gane LW et al (2007) Fragile X-associated tremor/ataxia syndrome: clinical features, genetics, and testing guidelines. Mov Disord

  • Binedell J, Soldan JR, Scourfield J, Harper PS (1996) Huntington’s disease predictive testing: the case for an assessment approach to requests from adolescents. J Med Genet 33:912–918

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Borry P, Fryns JP, Schotsmans P, Dierickx K (2005) Attitudes towards carrier testing in minors: a systematic review. Genet Couns 16:341–352

  • Botkin JR, Belmont JW, Berg JS, Berkman BE, Bombard Y, Holm IA, Levy HP, Ormond KE, Saal HM, Spinner NB, Wilfond BS, McInerney J (2015) Points to consider: ethical, legal, and psychosocial implications of genetic testing in children and adolescents. Am J Hum Genet 97(1):6–21

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Botta-Orfila T, Tartaglia GG, Michalon A (2016) Molecular pathophysiology of fragile X-associated tremor/ataxia syndrome and perspectives for drug development. Cerebellum 15:599–610

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bourgeois JA, Coffey SM, Rivera SM, Hessl D, Gane LW, Tassone F et al (2009) A review of fragile X premutation disorders: expanding the psychiatric perspective. J Clin Psychiatry 70:852–862

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chiang PW, Carpenter LE, Hagerman PJ (2001) The 5′-untranslated region of the FMR1 message facilitates translation by internal ribosome entry. J Biol Chem 276(41):37916–37921

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cozaru GC, Aschie M, Mitroi AF, Poinareanu I, Gorduza EV (2016) Ethical and genetic aspects regarding presymptomatic testing for neurodegenerative diseases. Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi 120(1):15–22

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • D’Amanda CS, Peay HL, Wheeler AC, Turbitt E, Biesecker BB (2019) Fragile X syndrome clinical trials: exploring parental decision-making. J Intellect Disabil Res

  • Farzin F, Perry H, Hessl D, Loesch D, Cohen J, Bacalman S, Gane L, Tassone F, Hagerman P, Hagerman R (2006) Autism spectrum disorders and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in boys with the fragile X premutation. J Dev Behav Pediatr 27(2 Suppl):S137–S144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabis L, Raz R (2010) The knowledge base of Israeli pediatricians in the area of child development. Harefuah 149(1)

  • Gabis L V, Kesner Baruch Y, Jokel A, Raz R (2011) Psychiatric and autistic comorbidity in fragile X syndrome across ages. J Child Neurol. 2011/04/30

  • Gabis LV, Hochberg O, Leon Attia O, Banet-Levi Y, Topf D, Shefer S (2017) Prolonged time lag to final diagnosis of fragile X syndrome. J Pediatr

  • Godard B, ten Kate L, Evers-Kiebooms G, Aymé S (2003) Population genetic screening programmes: principles, techniques, practices, and policies. Eur J Hum Genet 11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagerman RJ, Protic D, Rajaratnam A, Salcedo-Arellano MJ, Aydin EY, Schneider A (2018) Fragile X-associated neuropsychiatric disorders (FXAND). Front Psychiatry 9

  • Hamlin AA, Sukharev D, Campos L, Mu Y, Tassone F, Hessl D et al (2012) Hypertension in FMR1 premutation males with and without fragile X-associated tremor/ataxia syndrome (FXTAS). Am J Med Genet A 158A(6):1304–1309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hantash FM, Goos DM, Crossley B, Anderson B, Zhang K, Sun W, Strom CM (2011) FMR1 premutation carrier frequency in patients undergoing routine population-based carrier screening: insights into the prevalence of fragile X syndrome, fragile X-associated tremor/ataxia syndrome, and fragile X-associated primary ovarian insufficiency i. Genet Med 13(1):39–45

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jorde LB, Carey JC, Bamshad MJ (2015) Medical genetics. Elsevier. (Student consult)

  • Kraan CM, Hocking DR, Georgiou-Karistianis N, Metcalfe SA, Archibald AD, Fielding J et al (2014) Impaired response inhibition is associated with self-reported symptoms of depression, anxiety, and ADHD in female FMR1 premutation carriers. Am J Med Genet Part B Neuropsychiatr Genet 165(1):41–51

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kromberg JG, Wessels TM (2013) Ethical issues and Huntington’s disease. South African Med J 103(SUPPL. 1):1023–1026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lidia G, Annick R. Online survey on the atitiudes towards genetic testing of Fragile X in minors [Internet]. surveymonkey. 2018 [cited 2018 Feb 6]. Available from: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/Q2QMQD6

  • Loesch DZ, Huggins RM, Hagerman RJ (2004) Phenotypic variation and FMRP levels in fragile X. Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev 10(1):31–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metcalfe SA, Delatycki MB, Cohen J, Archibald AD, Emery JD (2018) Fragile X population carrier screening. Genetics in Medicine 20:1091–1092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quarrell OW, Clarke AJ, Compton C, de Die-Smulders CEM, Fryer A, Jenkins S et al (2018) Predictive testing of minors for Huntington’s disease: the UK and Netherlands experiences. Am J Med Genet Part B Neuropsychiatr Genet 177(1):35–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross LF, Acharya K (2008) Policy considerations in designing a fragile X population screening program. Genetics in Medicine 10:711–713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau F, Rouillard P, Morel ML, Khandjian EW, Morgan K (1995) Prevalence of carriers of premutation-size alleles of the FMRI gene--and implications for the population genetics of the fragile X syndrome. Am J Hum Genet 57(5):1006–1018

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner D, Choudhury S, Sideris J, Guarda S, Buansi A, Roche M et al (2011) Parents decisions to screen newborns for FMR1 gene expansions in a pilot research project. Obstet Gynecol Surv 66:616–617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SurveyMonkey Inc. www.surveymonkey.com [Internet]. San Mateo, California, USA. 2018. Available from: https://www.surveymonkey.com/welcome/sem/?&opt=brand&iv_=__iv_p_1_a_173788055_g_8916172415_c_207770216800_k_servermonkey_m_b_w_kwd-6161441176_n_g_d_c_v__l__t__r_1t1_x__y__f__o__z__i__j__s__e__h_2376_ii__vi__&utm_source=adwords&utm_medium=ppc&utm_term=serv

  • Toledano-Alhadef H, Basel-Vanagaite L, Magal N, Davidov B, Ehrlich S, Drasinover V, Taub E, Halpern GJ, Ginott N, Shohat M (2001) Fragile-X carrier screening and the prevalence of premutation and full-mutation carriers in Israel. Am J Hum Genet 69(2):351–360

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Verkerk AJMH, Pieretti M, Sutcliffe JS, Fu YH, Kuhl DPA, Pizzuti A, Reiner O, Richards S, Victoria MF, Zhang FP (1991) Identification of a gene (FMR-1) containing a CGG repeat coincident with a breakpoint cluster region exhibiting length variation in fragile X syndrome. Cell. 65(5):905–914

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Welt CK, Smith PC, Taylor AE (2004) Evidence of early ovarian aging in fragile X premutation carriers. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 89(9):4569–4574

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler AC, Bailey DB, Berry-Kravis E, Greenberg J, Losh M, Mailick M et al (2014) Associated features in females with an FMR1 premutation. J Neurodev Disord 6

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Leora Allen for editing at the time of manuscript submission. We are also grateful to Mrs. Meirav Shaham for the statistical contribution.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lidia V. Gabis.

Ethics declarations

The study and the questionnaire was approved by Helsinki committee 5018–18-SMC and was conducted in accordance with the provisions of the Declaration of Helsinki and GCP and adhered to ICMJE guidelines with regard to study registration.

Conflict Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gabis, L.V., Shefer, S. & Raas-Rothschild, A. Ethical Dilemmas Linked to Fragile X Testing of Minors—a Preliminary Survey Among Professionals. J Mol Neurosci 70, 254–259 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12031-019-01445-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12031-019-01445-2

Keywords

Navigation