Skip to main content
Log in

A National Survey on Coma Epidemiology, Evaluation, and Therapy in India: Revisiting the Curing Coma Campaign Come Together Survey

  • Original work
  • Published:
Neurocritical Care Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The limited representation from developing countries in the original COME TOGETHER survey gave us an impetus to conduct this survey in the Indian subcontinent.

Methods

This cross-sectional online survey was conducted from August through September 2022. Participants were health care physicians caring for patients with coma and disorders of consciousness. Fischer’s exact test or the Mann–Whitney U-test was used to compare respondents who agreed or disagreed with the preestablished coma definition. Fleiss κ values were calculated to assess agreement among respondents. A p value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

The survey was completed by 130 physicians. We found substantial interrater agreement on absence of wakefulness (71.54%; κ = 0.71), Glasgow Coma Score ≤ 8 (78.46%; κ = 0.78), and failure to respond purposefully to visual, verbal, or tactile stimuli (66.15%; κ = 0.66). Reported common etiologies of coma included traumatic brain injury (50.76%), ischemic stroke (30%), and intracerebral hemorrhage (29.23%). The most common clinical assessment tools used for coma included the Glasgow Coma Score (92.3%) and neurological examination (60.8%). Neurological examination was the most common diagnostic tool used (100%), followed by magnetic resonance imaging (89.2%), basic laboratory studies (88.5%), and head computed tomography/angiography (86.9%). Pharmacological interventions used to stimulate arousal in patients with coma were sedation vacation (91.5%), electrolyte/endocrine correction (65.4%), osmotic therapy with mannitol (60%), hypertonic saline (54.6%), modafinil (46.9%), and antidote for drugs (45.4%). Among the nonpharmacological interventions, sensory stimulation (57.7%) was the most commonly used modality. The most common discharge disposition for comatose patients who survived hospitalization were home with or without services (70.0%).

Conclusions

Differences from the global survey were noted regarding the following: traumatic brain injury being the most common etiology of coma in India, more frequent practice of sedation interruption, less frequent use of electroencephalography in India, rare use of pharmacological neurostimulants, and home being the most common discharge disposition in India.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brogan ME, Provencio JJ. Spectrum of catastrophic brain injury: coma and related disorders of consciousness. J Crit Care. 2014;29(4):679–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2014.04.014.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Glacino JT, Malone R. The vegetative and minimally conscious states. Handb Clin Neurol. 2008;90:99–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hammond FM, Katta-Charles S, Russell MB, et al. Research needs for prognostic modeling and trajectory analysis in patients with disorders of consciousness. Neurocrit Care. 2021;35(Suppl 1):55–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-021-01289-y.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Kondziella D, Menon DK, Helbok R, et al. A precision medicine framework for classifying patients with disorders of consciousness: advanced classification of consciousness endotypes (ACCESS). Neurocrit Care. 2021;35(Suppl 1):27–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-021-01246-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Luppi AI, Cain J, Spindler LRB, et al. Mechanisms underlying disorders of consciousness: bridging gaps to move toward an integrated translational science. Neurocrit Care. 2021;35(Suppl 1):37–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-021-01281-6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Edlow BL, Sanz LRD, Polizzotto L, et al. Therapies to restore consciousness in patients with severe brain injuries: a gap analysis and future directions. Neurocrit Care. 2021;35(Suppl 1):68–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-021-01227-y.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Provencio JJ, Hemphill JC, Claassen J, et al. The curing coma campaign: framing initial scientific challenges-proceedings of the first curing coma campaign scientific advisory council meeting. Neurocrit Care. 2020;33(1):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-020-01028-9.PMID:32578124;PMCID:PMC7392933.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Helbok R, Rass V, Beghi E, et al. The curing coma campaign international survey on coma epidemiology, evaluation, and therapy (COME TOGETHER). Neurocrit Care. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-021-01425-8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Kapoor I, Mahajan C, Zirpe KG, et al. The curing coma Campaign®: concerns in the Indian subcontinent. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2023;27(2):89–92.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33(1):159–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bickley LS, Szilzgyi PR, Hoffman RM. Bates Guide to physical examination and History taking, Twelfth edition, Wolters Kluwer. 2017; pp: 791.

  12. Kondziella D. Pearls and oysters: eyes-open coma. Neurology. 2021;96:864–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Prabhakar H, Tripathy S, Gupta N, et al. Consensus statement on analgo-sedation in neurocritical care and review of literature. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2021;25(2):126–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Claassen J, Doyle K, Matory A, et al. Detection of brain activation in unresponsive patients with acute brain injury. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(26):2497–505. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1812757.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Liu G, Su Y, Liu Y, et al. Predicting outcome in comatose patients: the role of EEG reactivity to quantifiable electrical stimuli. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2016;2016:8273716. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/8273716.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Hermann B, Stender J, Habert MO, et al. Multimodal FDG-PET and EEG assessment improves diagnosis and prognostication of disorders of consciousness. Neuroimage Clin. 2021;30:102601.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Peran P, Malagurski B, Nemmi F, et al. Functional and structural integrity of frontoparietal connectivity in traumatic and anoxic coma. Crit Care Med. 2020;48(8):e639–47.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Mattia GM, Sarton B, Villain E, et al. Multimodal MRI-based whole-brain assessment in patients in anoxoischemic coma by using 3D convolutional neural networks. Neurocrit Care. 2022;37(Suppl 2):303–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-022-01525-z.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Giacino JT, Whyte J, Bagiella E, et al. Placebo-controlled trial of amantadine for severe traumatic brain injury. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(9):819–26. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1102609.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hintze TD, Small CE, Montgomery J, Reveles KR, Hafeez S, Barthol CA. Comparison of amantadine, modafinil, and standard of care in the acute treatment of disorders of consciousness after severe traumatic brain injury. Clin Neuropharmacol. 2022;45(1):1–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/WNF.0000000000000487.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Leclerc AM, Riker RR, Brown CS, et al. Amantadine and modafinil as neurostimulants following acute stroke: a retrospective study of intensive care unit patients. Neurocrit Care. 2021;34(1):102–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-020-00986-4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Carey LM. Somatosensory loss after stroke. Crit Rev Phys Rehabil Med. 1995;7(1):51–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Norwood MF, Lakhani A, Watling DP, Marsh CH, Zeeman H. Efficacy of multimodal sensory therapy in adult acquired brain injury: a systematic review. Neuropsychol Rev. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11065-022-09560-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Padilla R, Domina A. Effectiveness of sensory stimulation to improve arousal and alertness of people in a coma or persistent vegetative state after traumatic brain injury: a systematic review. Am J Occup Ther. 2016;70(3):7003180030. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2016.021022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Zuo J, Tao Y, Liu M, Feng L, Yang Y, Liao L. The effect of family-centered sensory and affective stimulation on comatose patients with traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Nurs Stud. 2021;115:103846. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103846.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. van Veen E, van der Jagt M, Citerio G, Stocchetti N, Gommers D, Burdorf A, Menon DK, Maas AIR, Kompanje EJO, Lingsma HF, CENTER-TBI investigators and participants. Occurrence and timing of withdrawal of life-sustaining measures in traumatic brain injury patients: a CENTER-TBI study. Intensive Care Med. 2021;47(10):1115–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-021-06484-1

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Souter MJ, Blissitt PA, Blosser S, Bonomo J, Greer D, Jichici D, Mahanes D, Marcolini EG, Miller C, Sangha K, Yeager S. Recommendations for the critical care management of devastating brain injury: prognostication, psychosocial, and ethical management: a position statement for healthcare professionals from the Neurocritical care society. Neurocrit Care. 2015;23:4–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-015-0137-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kotwica Z, Jakubowski JK. Head-injured adult patients with GCS of 3 on admission–who have a chance to survive? Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1995;133(1–2):56–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

List of Collaborators are Dr Gayatri L Madhavan, Dr Prashanth Prabhu, Dr Sohail Sachdeva, Dr Amlendu Yadav, Dr Ashima Malhotra, Dr Himanshu Sikri, Dr Ankur Luthra, Dr Ratnesh K Shukla, Dr Ripenmeet salhotra, Dr Sanjiv S Bais, Dr Uma Hariharan, Dr Sivakumar M N, Dr Poonam V Bharambe, Dr Indu Kapoor, Dr Seema B Wasnik, Dr Dinesh Chandak, Dr Nivedita D Moulick, Dr S Manikandan, Dr Pramod Sood, Dr Varsha Zanwar, Dr Hariharan M, Dr Ramunaidu Yellapu, Dr Deepali Herode, Dr Sushma Gurav, Dr Jaya Wanchoo, Dr Shruti Sharma, Dr GSUM Rao, Dr Apurba K Borah, Dr Sudeshna Padhi, Dr Anil kumar, Dr Charu Mahajan, Dr Leena A Patil, Dr Suhas Karkamkar, Dr Vasudha Singhal, Dr Reshu G Khanikar, Dr Pragyan K Routray, Dr Shalini Nair, Dr Urvi Shukla, Dr Ria V Malhotra, Dr Hrishikesh Vaidya, Dr Afroz Khan, Dr Abhaya, Dr Khalid Khatib, Dr Subhal Dixit, Dr Sanjay Walke, Dr Vaibhav Rathi, Dr Ravindra Ghawat, Dr Piyush A Dhawad, dr Shrirang Bamne, Dr Prajakta Pote, Dr Upendra K, Dr Reshma, Dr Jayram Navade, Dr Balasaheb D Bande, Dr Milind Mane, Dr Zafer A Khan, Dr Yogesh Rathod, Dr Sudershana Patil, Dr Amol Jadhav, Dr Pravin S Gare, Dr Achal Gaidhar, Dr Pallavi Meshram, Dr Sonika V Makhija, Dr Suhail S Masoom, Dr Gunadhar Padhi, Dr Vitthal S Alane, Dr Tushar Yadav, Dr Anita Mohanty, Dr Amol Kulkarni, Dr Rahul Pingle, Dr Khusrav Bajan, Dr Sudhir Deshpande, Dr Kapil Zirpe, Dr Baljeet Kaur, Dr Vinay Singhal, Dr Anand Dongre, Dr Ajit K Thakur, Dr Prasad Suryawanshi, Dr Balkrishna Nimavat, Dr Prashant Kumar, Dr Anand Tiwari, Dr Abhijeet Deshmukh, Dr Jignesh Shah, Dr Sridhar, Dr Sharmili Sinha, Dr Sunita A Borade, Dr Ruchira Khasne, Dr Neeta Karmarkar, Dr Abdul S Ansari, Dr Ajit Tambolkar, Dr Santosh Sontakke, Dr Manisha Dhobe, Dr Yash Javeri, Dr Prajakta Lanjewar, Dr S Srinivas, Dr Sunitha Varghese, Dr Deven Juneja, Dr Gunjan Chanchalani, Dr Tadit P Mohanty, Dr Imran Khan, Dr Vivek B Sharma, Dr Suresh Ramasubban, Dr Abhishek Singh, Dr Shradha Gugale, Dr Nidhi Gupta, Dr Gaurav S Tomar, Dr Apurva Kakatkar, Dr Ranvir S Tyagi, Dr N Selvarajan, Dr Ishwar Behera, Dr Raymond D Savio, Dr Jayanti Singh, Dr Ajinkya Bhosle, Dr Gaurav Kakkar, Dr Chaitanya JSK, Dr Jyoti Shendge, Dr Kanwalpreet Sodhi, Dr Pradeep Sharma, Dr S B Mohapatra, Dr Devachandran, Dr Pratheema Ramachandran, Dr Nilesh Sharma, Dr Dona Saha, Dr Rajeev Aggarwal, Dr Raman Piplani, Dr Srikanth, Dr Sathyamurthy G, Dr Naveen Asokumar, Dr Ramchandra V Vinnu, Dr Jyoti Sharma.

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Contributions

CM prepared the first draft of the manuscript and made subsequent changes suggested by coauthors. HP conceived the plan of the study, conducted the survey, analyzed data, and helped in finalizing the draft of the manuscript. VR helped in analyzing data and preparation of the results. MMcN helped in reviewing the results and the manuscript. IK helped in preparation of the manuscript and writing the Discussion. RH reviewed and finalized the manuscript. KZ reviewed the manuscript and gave necessary inputs for the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hemanshu Prabhakar.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval/informed consent

The authors confirm adherence to ethical guidelines and indicate ethical approvals.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 31 kb)

Supplementary file2 (DOCX 59 kb)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mahajan, C., Prabhakar, H., Rass, V. et al. A National Survey on Coma Epidemiology, Evaluation, and Therapy in India: Revisiting the Curing Coma Campaign Come Together Survey. Neurocrit Care (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-023-01852-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-023-01852-9

Keywords

Navigation