Abstract
The objective of this study is to determine whether the morphometric evaluation of the foramen magnum using computed tomography can be used as an accurate tool in estimating the sex of an individual. An extensive search of the databases, PubMed, ProQuest, Google Scholar, and Scopus, was carried out to procure articles that fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The AQUA tool was used to assess the quality of the included studies. A random effects model was used for the meta-analysis of the eligible studies using the STATA software, version 16, 2019 at 95% CI and p ≤ 0.05. Eleven eligible articles that measured the transverse and sagittal diameters of the foramen magnum using computed tomography were included in this study. The sagittal diameter of the foramen magnum was greater than the transverse diameter, and both the diameters were greater in males than in females. Meta-analysis revealed that both transverse and sagittal diameters were more reliable for male sex estimation. Since there is a dimensional variation between the male and female foramen magnum, it can be used for initial sex identification and also as an auxiliary to other advanced methods of sex estimation.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The data that supports the findings of this study will be provided by the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
Lynnerup N. Forensic anthropology and human identification. Scandinavian J Forensic Sci. 2013. https://doi.org/10.2478/sjfs-2013-0005.
Thompson T, Errickson D, editors. Human remains: another dimension: the application of imaging to the study of human remains. Academic Press. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-804602-9.00006-0.
Rai H, Keluskar V, Patil S, Bagewadi A. Accuracy of measurements of foramen magnum and occipital condyle as an indicator for sex determination using computed tomography. Indian J Health Sci Biomed Res (KLEU). 2017. https://doi.org/10.4103/2349-5006.198595.
Dawson C, Ross D, Mallett X. Sex determination. Forensic Anthropol. 2011;61–94. https://doi.org/10.1201/b10727-4.
Gapert R, Black S, Last J. Sex determination from the foramen magnum: discriminant function analysis in an eighteenth and nineteenth century British sample. Int J Legal Med. 2008. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-008-0256-0.
Spradley MK, Jantz RL. Sex estimation in forensic anthropology: skull versus postcranial elements. J Forensic Sci. 2011. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2010.01635.x.
Kelley MA. Sex determination with fragmented skeletal remains. J Forensic Sci. 1979. https://doi.org/10.1520/jfs10802j.
Scheuer L, Black S. Preface. Develop Juvenile Osteol. 2000;ix–x. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-012624000-9/50001-0.
Romanes GJ. Cunningham’s textbook of anatomy. 12 ed. Oxford: Oxford university press. 1981;114.
Annuar SH. Sex and height determination by foramen magnum morphometry using multiplanar reconstruction (MPR) CT skull images (Doctoral dissertation, Universiti Sains Malaysia).
Le Blanc-Louvry I, Thureau S, Duval C, Papin-Lefebvre F, Thiebot J, Dacher JN, et al. Post-mortem computed tomography compared to forensic autopsy findings: a French experience. Eur Radiol. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-013-2779-0.
Garofalo EM. Radiography/nondestructive analysis. Int Encycloped Biol Anthropol. 2018;1–3. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118584538.ieba0420.
Jackowski C, Wyss M, Persson A, Classens M, Thali MJ, Lussi A. Ultra-high-resolution dual-source CT for forensic dental visualization—discrimination of ceramic and composite fillings. Int J Legal Med. 2008. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-008-0224-8.
Zdilla M, Russell M, Bliss K, Mangus K, Koons A. The size and shape of the foramen magnum in man. J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2017. https://doi.org/10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_62_17.
Zhan M, Cui J, Zhang K, Chen Y, Deng Z. Estimation of stature and sex from skull measurements by multidetector computed tomography in Chinese. Leg Med. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.legalmed.2019.101625.
Darwish R, Salama N, Elsirafy M, Kholeif W. Identification of sex from foramen magnum of Egyptian skulls using three dimensional computed tomography. Ain Shams J Forensic Med Clin Toxicol. 2014.https://doi.org/10.21608/ajfm.2014.19158.
Henry BM, Tomaszewski KA, Ramakrishnan PK, Roy J, Vikse J, Loukas M, et al. Development of the Anatomical Quality Assessment (AQUA) Tool for the quality assessment of anatomical studies included in meta-analyses and systematic reviews. Clin Anat. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.22799.
Henry BM, Tomaszewski KA, Walocha JA. Methods of Evidence-Based Anatomy: a guide to conducting systematic reviews and meta-analysis of anatomical studies. Ann Anat. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aanat.2015.12.002.
Tellioglu AM, Durum Y, Gok M, Karakas S, Polat AG, Karaman CZ. Suitability of foramen magnum measurements in sex determination and their clinical significance. Folia Morphol (Warsz). 2018. https://doi.org/10.5603/fm.a2017.0070.
More C, Saha N, Vijayvargiya R. Morphological analysis of foramen magnum for gender determination by using computed tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2015;1(2):51–56.
Meral O, Belkıs Toklu B, Meydan R, Kaya A, Karadayı B, Acar T. Sex estimation from foramen magnum parameters in adult Turkish population: a computed tomography study. Leg Med. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.legalmed.2020.101775.
Abo El-Atta HMH, Abdel-Rahman RH, El-Hawary G, Abo El-Al-Atta HM. Sexual dimorphism of foramen magnum: an Egyptian study. Egypt J Forensic Sci. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41935-019-0167-x.
Singh PK, Tamrakar D, Karki S, Menezes RG. Determination of sex from the foramen magnum using 3DCT: a Nepalese study. Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ). 2017;15(57):61–5.
Aghakhani K, Kazemzadeh N, Ghafurian F, Soltani B, Soltani S. Gender determination using diagnostic values of foramen magnum. Int J Med Toxicol Forensic Med. 2016;6(1):29–35.
Teodoru-Raghina D, Marinescu M, Diaconeasa A, Olteanu B, Perlea P, Dragu M. Crania sexual dimorphism of an European subpopulation: CT scan discriminant function analysis in a Romanian subadult casuistry. Rom J Leg Med. 2017;25:373–8.
Toneva D, Nikolova S, Harizanov S, Georgiev I, Zlatareva D, Hadjidekov V, et al. Sex estimation by size and shape of foramen magnum based on CT imaging. Leg Med. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.legalmed.2018.09.009.
Mehta M, Saini V, Patel MN, Menon SK. Applicability and reliability of foramen magnum for sex determination in contemporary Western Indian population: a computed tomographic study. J Forensic Radiol Imag. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jofri.2019.05.005.
Zappalá M, Lightbourne S, Heneghan NR. The relationship between thoracic kyphosis and age, and normative values across age groups: a systematic review of healthy adults. J Orthop Surg Res. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02592-2.
Slima SR, Abdou ER. Orbital and foramen magnum variables for sex determination in Egyptians using computed tomographic images. Egyptian J Forensic Sci Appl Toxicol. 2020;20(4):73–83.
Aljarrah K, Packirisamy V, Al Anazi N, Nayak SB. Morphometric analysis of foramen magnum and occipital condyle using CT images for sex determination in a Saudi Arabian population. Morphologie. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.morpho.2021.07.006.
Atreya A, Shrestha R, Bhandari K, Malla SK, Acharya S, Menezes RG. Morphometric analysis of the foramen magnum in sex estimation: an additional 3DCT study from Nepal on a larger sample. Health Sci Rep. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.999.
Humphrey LT. Growth patterns in the modern human skeleton. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1998. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1096-8644(199801)105:1<57::aid-ajpa6>3.0.co;2-a.
Richards GD, Jabbour RS. Foramen magnum ontogeny in Homo sapiens: a functional matrix perspective. Anat Rec Adv Integr Anat Evol Biol. 2010. https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.21319.
Saleh S, Allam W, Mahmoud H. Sex determination by measuring length and breadth of foramen magnum at computed tomographic images of skull. Egyptian J Forensic Sci Appl Toxicol. 2019. https://doi.org/10.21608/ejfsat.2019.12227.1071.
Frayer DW, Wolpoff MH. Sexual Dimorphism. Annu Rev Anthropol. 1985. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.14.100185.002241.
Page MJ, McKenzie J, Bossuyt P, Boutron I, Hoffmann T, mulrow cindy d, et al. Updating guidance for reporting systematic reviews: development of the PRISMA 2020 statement. 2020. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/jb4dx.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Dr. Anabelle L.V.C. Fernandes (AF) Conceptualization; data curation; methodology; formal analysis; writing—original draft Dr. Arvind Shetti (AS) Data curation; formal analysis; writing—review and editing. Dr. Vasanti Lagali-Jirge (VJ) Conceptualization; methodology; formal analysis; writing—review and editing. Dr. Vaishali Keluskar Supervision; validation; visualization.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
No separate ethics committee review or approval was obtained.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Fernandes, A.L.V.C., Shetti, A., Lagali-Jirge, V. et al. Accuracy of sex estimation by morphometric evaluation of foramen magnum using computed tomography – a systematic review and meta-analysis. Forensic Sci Med Pathol 20, 268–279 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12024-023-00613-6
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12024-023-00613-6