Abstract
Radiologic forensic identification is usually performed by comparing antemortem and postmortem radiographs. While computed tomography (CT) has become a valuable addition to radiologic identification, magnetic resonance (MR) imaging has only rarely been used for this purpose. In our case, identification was accomplished using fused MR- and CT images in a survivor of a gunshot injury to the head. This case supports and highlights the possibility to perform intermodality radiologic identification comparing preexisting MR imaging to subsequently aquired CT data in living (or deceased) humans as long as manual modifications of windowing, color and contrast enable differentiation of the two modalities in the fused image.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Saukko PJ, Knight B. The establishment of identity of human remains. In: Saukko P, Knight B, editors. Knight's forensic pathology. London: Edward Arnold Ltd.; 2004. p. 98–135.
Brogdon BG. Forensic radiology in historical perspective. In: Thali MJ, Viner MD, Brogdon BG, editors. Brogdon’s forensic radiology. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2011. p. 9–24.
Jablonski NG, Shum BS. Identification of unknown human remains by comparison of antemortem and postmortem radiographs. Forensic Sci Int. 1989;42(3):221–30.
Brough AL, Morgan B, Rutty GN. The basics of disaster victim identification. J Forensic Radiol Imaging. 2015;3(1):29–37.
OECD. Computed tomography (CT) scanners (indicator). 2017.
OECD. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) units (indicator). 2017.
Ciaffi R, Gibelli D, Cattaneo C. Forensic radiology and personal identification of unidentified bodies: a review. Radiol Med. 2011;116(6):960–8.
Dedouit F, Telmon N, Costagliola R, Otal P, Florence LL, Joffre F, et al. New identification possibilities with postmortem multislice computed tomography. Int J Legal Med. 2007;121(6):507–10.
Dedouit F, Savall F, Mokrane FZ, Rousseau H, Crubezy E, Rouge D, et al. Virtual anthropology and forensic identification using multidetector CT. Br J Radiol. 2014;87(1036):20130468.
Hatch GM, Dedouit F, Christensen AM, Thali MJ, Ruder TD. RADid: a pictorial review of radiologic identification using postmortem CT. J Forensic Radiol Imaging. 2014;2(2):52–9.
Pfaeffli M, Vock P, Dirnhofer R, Braun M, Bolliger SA, Thali MJ. Post-mortem radiological CT identification based on classical ante-mortem X-ray examinations. Forensic Sci Int. 2007;171(2–3):111–7.
Huda W. Review of radiologic physics. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer; 2016.
Amberg R, Forster B, Fürmaier R. Identification by MRI. Zeitschrift für Rechtsmedizin. 1989;2(3):102.
Shamir L. MRI-based knee image for personal identification. Int J Biometrics. 2013;5(2):113.
Silva RF, Botelho TL, Prado FB, Kawagushi JT, Daruge Junior E, Berzin F. Human identification based on cranial computed tomography scan: a case report. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2011;40(4):257–61.
Hall EJ, Brenner DJ. Cancer risks from diagnostic radiology: the impact of new epidemiological data. Br J Radiol. 2012;85(1020):e1316–7.
Ruder TD, Kraehenbuehl M, Gotsmy WF, Mathier S, Ebert LC, Thali MJ, et al. Radiologic identification of disaster victims: a simple and reliable method using CT of the paranasal sinuses. Eur J Radiol. 2012;81(2):e132–8.
Christensen AM. Assessing the variation in individual frontal sinus outlines. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2005;127(3):291–5.
Auffret M, Garetier M, Diallo I, Aho S, Ben SD. Contribution of the computed tomography of the anatomical aspects of the sphenoid sinuses to forensic identification. J Neuroradiol. 2016;43(6):404–14.
Yoshino M, Miyasaka S, Sato H, Seta S. Classification system of frontal sinus patterns by radiography. Its application to identification of unknown skeletal remains. Forensic Sci Int. 1987;34(4):289–99.
Ruder TD, Brun C, Christensen AM, Thali MJ, Gascho D, Schweitzer W, et al. Comparative radiologic identification with CT images of paranasal sinuses – development of a standardized approach. J Forensic Radiol Imaging. 2016;7:1–9.
Morgan B, Alminyah A, Cala A, O'Donnell C, Elliott D, Gorincour G, et al. Use of post-mortem computed tomography in disaster victim identification. Positional statement of the members of the disaster victim identification working group of the International Society of Forensic Radiology and Imaging; may 2014. J Forensic Radiol Imaging. 2014;2(3):114–6.
Viner MD, Alminyah A, Apostol M, Brough A, Develter W, O'Donnell C, et al. Use of radiography and fluoroscopy in disaster victim identification. Positional statement of the members of the disaster victim identification working group of the International Society of Forensic Radiology and Imaging. J Forensic Radiol Imaging. 2015;3(2):141–5.
Acknowledgements
The authors express their gratitude to Emma Louise Kessler, MD for her generous donation to the Zurich Institute of Forensic Medicine, University of Zurich, Switzerland.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical approval
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.Ethical approval was obtained by the Ethics Committee of the Canton of Zurich, Nr. KEK ZH-Nr. 15-0686.
Conflict of interest
None.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Heimer, J., Gascho, D., Gentile, S. et al. Antemortem identification by fusion of MR and CT of the paranasal sinuses. Forensic Sci Med Pathol 13, 375–378 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12024-017-9873-6
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12024-017-9873-6