Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effects of Feed Time, Organic Loading and Shock Loads in Anaerobic Whey Treatment by an AnSBBR with Circulation

  • Published:
Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this work was to investigate the effect of different feeding times (2, 4, and 6 h) and organic loading rates (3, 6 and 12 gCOD l−1 day−1) on the performance of an anaerobic sequencing batch reactor containing immobilized biomass, as well as to verify the minimum amount of alkalinity that can be added to the influent. The reactor, in which mixing was achieved by recirculation of the liquid phase, was maintained at 30 ± 1°C, possessed 2.5 l reactional volume and treated 1.5 l cheese whey in 8-h cycles. Results showed that the effect of feeding time on reactor performance was more pronounced at higher values of organic loading rates (OLR). During operation at an OLR of 3 gCOD l−1 day−1, change in feeding time did not affect efficiency of organic matter removal from the reactor. At an OLR of 6 gCOD l−1 day−1, reactor efficiency improved in relation to the lower loading rate and tended to drop at longer feeding times. At an OLR of 12 gCOD l−1 day−1 the reactor showed to depend more on feeding time; higher feeding times resulted in a decrease in reactor efficiency. Under all conditions shock loads of 24 gCOD l−1 day−1 caused an increase in acids concentration in the effluent. However, despite this increase, the reactor regained stability readily and alkalinity supplied to the influent showed to be sufficient to maintain pH close to neutral during operation. Regardless of applied OLR, operation with feeding time of 2 h was which provided improved stability and rendered the process less susceptible to shock loads.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Malaspina, F., Stante, L., Cellamare, C. M., & Tilche, A. (1995). Cheese whey and cheese factory wastewater treatment with a biological anaerobic–aerobic process. Water Science and Technology, 32, 59–72. doi:10.1016/0273-1223(96)00139-4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Yan, J. Q., Lo, K. V., & Pinder, K. L. (1992). Instability caused by high strength of cheese whey in a UASB reactor. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 41, 700–706. doi:10.1002/bit.260410704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Borja, R., & Banks, C. J. (1995). Response of an anaerobic fluidized bed reactor treating and pH shocks. Journal of Biotechnology, 39, 251–259. doi:10.1016/0168-1656(95)00021-H.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bermúdez, J. J., Jimeno, A., Cánovas-Díaz, M., Manjón, A., & Iborra, J. L. (1988). Stability of an anaerobic percolating filter during successive feed changes, and organic and hydraulic overloadings. Process Biochemistry, 23, 178–181.

    Google Scholar 

  5. García, P. A., Rico, J. L., & Fdz-Polanco, F. (1991). Anaerobic treatment of cheese whey in a two-phase UASB reactor. Environmental Technology, 12, 355–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Yilmazer, G., & Yenigün, O. (1999). Two-phase anaerobic treatment of cheese whey. Water Science and Technology, 40, 289–295. doi:10.1016/S0273-1223(99)00397-2.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Bagley, D. M., & Brodkorb, T. S. (1999). Modeling microbial kinetic in an anaerobic sequencing batch reactor—model development and experimental validation. Water Environment Research, 71, 1320–1332. doi:10.2175/106143096X122366.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Zaiat, M., Rodrigues, J. A. D., Ratusznei, S. M., Camargo, E. F. M., & Borzani, W. (2001). Anaerobic sequencing batch reactors for wastewater treatment: a developing technology. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 55, 29–35. doi:10.1007/s002530000475.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Shizas, I., & Bagley, D. M. (2002). Improving anaerobic sequencing batch reactor performance by modifying operational parameters. Water Research, 36, 363–367. doi:10.1016/S0043-1354(01)00237-8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ramos, A. C. T., Ratusznei, S. M., Rodrigues, J. A. D., & Zaiat, M. (2003). Mass transfer improvement of a fixed-bed anaerobic sequencing batch reactor with liquid phase circulation. Journal of Science and Technology of the Americas—Interciencia, 28, 214–219.

    Google Scholar 

  11. APHA. (1995). Standard Methods for Examination of Water and Wastewater (19th ed.). Washington, DC, USA: American Public Health Association.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa of the Estado de São Paulo—FAPESP (São Paulo, Brasil), process number 03/09216-4. We also acknowledge the assistance of Dr. Baltus C. Bonse in the revision of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to José A. D. Rodrigues.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bezerra Jr., R.A., Rodrigues, J.A.D., Ratusznei, S.M. et al. Effects of Feed Time, Organic Loading and Shock Loads in Anaerobic Whey Treatment by an AnSBBR with Circulation. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 157, 140–158 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-008-8371-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-008-8371-4

Keywords

Navigation