Abstract
Polanyi insisted that scientific knowledge was intensely personal in nature, though held with universal intent. His insights regarding the personal values of beauty and morality in science are first enunciated. These are then explored for their relevance to engineering. It is shown that the practice of engineering is also governed by aesthetics and ethics. For example, Polanyi’s three spheres of morality in science—that of the individual scientist, the scientific community and the wider society—has parallel entities in engineering. The existence of shared values in engineering is also demonstrated, in aesthetics through an example that shows convergence of practitioner opinion to solutions that represent accepted models of aesthetics; and in ethics through the recognition that many professional engineering institutions hold that the safety of the public supersedes the interests of the client. Such professional consensus can be seen as justification for studying engineering aesthetics and ethics as inter-subjective disciplines.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Birsch, D., & Fielder, J. H. (Eds.). (1994). The Ford Pinto case: A study in applied ethics, business and technology. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
Blockley, D. (2005). Do ethics matter? The Structural Engineer, 83(7), 27–31.
Blockley, D. I., & Godfrey, P. (2000). Doing it differently: Systems for rethinking construction. London: Thomas Telford.
Davis, M. (1998). Thinking like an engineer: Studies in the ethics of a profession. New York: Oxford University Press.
Dias, W. P. S. (2003). Heidegger’s relevance for engineering: Questioning technology. Science and Engineering Ethics, 9(3), 389–396.
Dias, W. P. S. (2007). Philosophical grounding and computational formalization for practice based engineering knowledge. Knowledge Based Systems, 20(4), 382–387.
Dias, W. P. S., & Al-Kabbani, I. (1997). Design and performance of 11350 cu.m. rectangular Jubilee Reservoir in Sri Lanka. Engineer, Sri Lanka, June, pp. 74–81.
Ferre, F. (1995). Philosophy of technology. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.
Feyerabend, P. (1970). Consolations for the specialist. In I. Lakatos & A. Musgrave (Eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge (pp. 197–230). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Herkert, J. R. (2001). Future directions in engineering ethics research: Microethics, macroethics and the role of professional societies. Science and Engineering Ethics, 7(3), 403–414.
Joy, B. (2000). Why the future doesn’t need us. Wired, Archive 8.04. http://www.wired/com/wired/archive/8.04/joy_pr.html. Accessed 18 Nov 2009.
Kulasuriya, C., Dias, W. P. S., & Hettiarachchi, M. T. P. (2002). The aesthetics of proportion in structural form. The Structural Engineer, 80(14), 22–27.
Magee, B. (1973). Popper. London: Fontana.
Nair. (2001). Personal communication. Pittsburgh: Carnegie Mellon University.
Pantazidou, M., & Nair, I. (1999). Ethic of care: Guiding principles for engineering teaching and practice. Journal of Engineering Education, April, 205–212.
Pinkus, R. L. B., Shuman, L. J., Hummon, N. P., & Wolfe, H. (1997). Engineering ethics: Balancing cost, schedule and risk—lessons learned from the space shuttle. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Polanyi, M. (1946). Science, faith and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Polanyi, M. (1958). Personal knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Polanyi, M. (1966). The tacit dimension. Garden City, NY: Doubleday and Co.
Popper, K. R. (1945). The open society and its enemies (Vol. 1). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Rutsky, R. L. (1999). High techne: Art and technology from the machine aesthetic to the posthuman. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Tronto, J. C. (1993). Moral boundaries: A political argument for an ethic of care. New York: Routledge.
Vojak, B. A., Price, R. L., & Griffin, A. (2009). Interdisciplinarity and innovation in the corporate world. In R. Frodeman, J. Klein, & C. Mitcham (Eds.), Oxford handbook of interdisciplinarity. Oxford: Oxford University Press (forthcoming).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dias, P. Aesthetics and Ethics in Engineering: Insights from Polanyi. Sci Eng Ethics 17, 233–243 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-009-9188-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-009-9188-4