Skip to main content
Log in

Towards the conscientious development of ethical nanotechnology

  • Published:
Science and Engineering Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Nanotechnology, the emerging capability of human beings to observe and organize matter at the atomic level, has captured the attention of the federal government, science and engineering communities, and the general public. Some proponents are referring to nanotechnology as “the next technological revolution”. Applications projected for this new evolution in technology span a broad range from the design and fabrication of new membranes, to improved fuel cells, to sophisticated medical prosthesis techniques, to tiny intelligent machines whose impact on humankind is unknowable. As with the appropriation of technological innovation generally, nanotechnology is likely to eventually bring dramatic and unpredictable new capabilities to human material existence, along with resulting ethical challenges and social changes to be reconciled. But as of yet, aside from a few simple new consumer goods, such as paint, rackets and fabric coatings, nanotechnology is undeveloped. Its social and ethical dimensions are not apparent. Even still, given the stated goals of the various nanotechnology initiatives to rearrange matter with increasing atomic precision, the impact of nanotechnology on human life and society is likely be profound. It is very difficult, however, to make accurate predictions about the future impact of nanotechnology development on humanity. At this time, the most important role for ethics analysis is to contribute to a humanitarian, conscientious approach to its development. This paper suggests that such an approach requires that attention be given to the roles of imagination, meaning-making, metaphor, myth and belief.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nanotechnology: Shaping the World Atom by Atom. (1999) National Science and Technology Council; Committee on Technology, (NSTC). Interagency Working Group on Nanoscience, Engineering and Technology (IWGN).

  2. Winner, L. (1986) The Whale and the Reactor: a Search for Limits in an Age of High Technology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, xiv, 200 p.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ricoeur, P. (1995) Figuring the Sacred; Religious, Narrative and Imagination, ed. M.I. Wallace, Augsburg Fortress, Minneapolis, MN.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ricoeur, P. (1967) Symbolism of Evil, Beacon Press, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Roco, M.C., Bainbridge, W.S. and National Science and Technology Council (U.S.). Subcommittee on Nanoscale Science Engineering and Technology (2001) Societal Implications of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology: NSET workshop report. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Germany and Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mikulski, B. (2001) Societal Implications of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology: NSET Workshop Report, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Germany and Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Drexler, K.E., Peterson, C. and Pergamit, G. (1991) Unbounding the Future: The Nanotechnology Revolution. 1st Quill ed., Quill, New York: 304 p.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Baum, R. (2003) Nanotechnology: Drexler and Smalley Make the Case For and Against ‘Molecular Assemblers’, in Chemical and Engineering News 81(48).

  9. Drexler, K.E. (1986) Engines of Creation. 1st ed. Anchor Press/Doubleday. Garden City, N.Y., xii, 298 p.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mitcham, C. (1994) Thinking through Technology: The Path Between Engineering and Philosophy, University of Chicago Press, Chicago. xi, 397 p.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. (1999) Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western thought, Basic Books, New York, xiv, 624.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Johnson, M. (1994) Moral Imagination; Implications of Cognitive Science for Ethics, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Marcuse, H. (1964) One-Dimensional Man: Studies in the Ideology of Advanced Industrial Society, Beacon Press, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Latour, B. (1987) Science in Action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Winner, L. (1997) Technomania is Overtaking the Millenium; see http://www.rpi.edu/~winner/How%How20Technomania.html.

  16. Joy, B. (2000) Why the Future Doesn’t Need Us, in Wired; see www.wired.com/wired/archive/8.04/joy_pr.html.

  17. Dyson, F.J. (1997) Imagined Worlds. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 216 p.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Stephenson, N. (1995) The Diamond Age, or, Young Lady’s Illustrated Primer, Bantam Books, New York, 455 p.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Crichton, M. (2002) Prey, 1st ed., Harper Collins Publishers, New York, xiii, 367 p.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rosalyn W. Berne.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Berne, R.W. Towards the conscientious development of ethical nanotechnology. SCI ENG ETHICS 10, 627–638 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-004-0043-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-004-0043-3

Keywords

Navigation