Skip to main content
Log in

Authorship in a small medical journal: A study of contributorship statements by corresponding authors

  • Published:
Science and Engineering Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The authorship criteria of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) are widely accepted in biomedical journals, but many studies in large and prestigious journals show that a considerable proportion of authors do not fulfill these criteria. We investigated authorship contributions in a small medical journal outside the scientific mainstream, to see if poor adherence to authorship criteria is common in biomedical journals. We analyzed statements on research contribution, as checked by the corresponding author, for individual authors of 114 research articles, representing 475 authors, submitted to the Croatian Medical Journal (CMJ) from 1999 to 2000. Only 40% of authors fulfilled the ICMJE authorship criteria. The authors listed first on the by-line were more likely to fulfill the authorship criteria than all other authors on the by-line. The percentage of authors fulfilling the ICMJE criteria of authorship decreased with the increase in the number of authors listed on the by-line. These results indicate that poor adherence to ICMJE authorship criteria is poor across biomedical journals, regardless of the size of the scientific community. Authorship and contributorship in biomedical journals, as well as editorial ethical responsibilities towards authorship criteria need critical redefinition and education of both editors and authors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. [Anonymous] (1982) Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Annals of Internal Medicine 96: 766–771.

  2. [Anonymous] (1985) Editorial consensus on authorship and other matters. Lancet 2: 595.

  3. [Anonymous] (1988) Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Annals of Internal Medicine 108: 258–265.

  4. [Anonymous] (1993) Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Journal of the American Medical Association 269: 2282–2286.

  5. [Anonymous] (1997) Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Annals of Internal Medicine 126: 36–47.

  6. Davidoff, F., Godlee, F., Hoey, J., Glass, R., Overbeke, J., Utiger, R., Nicholls, M.G., Horton, R., Nylenna, M., Hojgaard, L. & Kotzin, S. (2003) Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals. Journal of the American Osteopathic Association 103: 137–149.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Burman, K.D. (1982) “Hanging from the masthead”: reflections on authorship. Annals of Internal Medicine 97: 602–605.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Onwude, J.L., Staines, A. & Lilford, R.J. (1993) Multiple author trend worst in medicine. British Medical Journal 306: 1345.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kassirer, J.P. & Angell, M. (1991) On authorship and acknowledgments. New England Journal of Medicine 325: 1510–1512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Khan, K.S., Nwosu, C.R., Khan, S.F., Dwarakanath, L.S. & Chien, P.F. (1999) A controlled analysis of authorship trends over two decades. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 181: 503–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Huth, E.J. (1986) Irresponsible authorship and wasteful publication. Annals of Internal Medicine 104: 257–259.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Flanagin, A., Carey, L.A., Fontanarosa, P.B., Phillips, S.G., Pace, B.P., Lundberg, G.D. & Rennie, D. (1998) Prevalence of articles with honorary authors and ghost authors in peer-reviewed medical journals. Journal of the American Medical Association 280: 222–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Smith, R. (1997) Authorship: time for a paradigm shift? British Medical Journal 314: 992.

    Google Scholar 

  14. [Anonymous] (1997) Games people play with authors’ names. Nature 387: 831.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Flanagin, A., Fontanarosa, P.B. & DeAngelis, C.D. (2002) Authorship for research groups. Journal of the American Medical Association 288: 3166–3168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Horton, R. (1996) Prizes, publications, and promotion. Lancet 348: 1398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Horton, R. & Smith, R. (1996) Signing up for authorship. Lancet 347: 780.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Rennie, D., Flanagin, A. & Yank, V. (2000) The contributions of authors. Journal of the American Medical Association 284: 89–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Rennie, D. (2001) Who did what? Authorship and contribution in 2001. Muscle & Nerve 24: 1274–1277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Marusic, A. & Marusic, M. (1999) Authorship criteria and academic reward. Lancet 353: 1713–1714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lawrence, P.A. (2002) Rank injustice. Nature 415: 835–836.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bennett, D.M. & Taylor, D.M. (2003) Unethical practices in authorship of scientific papers. Emergency Medicine 15: 263–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. [Anonymous] (2003) Who’d want to work in a team? Nature 424: 1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Eastwood, S., Derish, P., Leash, E. & Ordway, S. (1996) Ethical issues in biomedical research: perceptions and practices of postdoctoral research fellows responding to a survey. Science and Engineering Ethics 2: 89–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Shapiro, D.W., Wenger, N.S. & Shapiro, M.F. (1994) The contributions of authors to multiauthored biomedical research papers. Journal of the American Medical Association 271: 438–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hoen, W.P., Walvoort, H.C. & Overbeke, A.J. (1998) What are the factors determining authorship and the order of the authors’ names? A study among authors of the Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde (Dutch Journal of Medicine). Journal of the American Medical Association 280: 217–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Hwang, S.S., Song, H.H., Baik, J.H., Jung, S.L., Park, S.H., Choi, K.H. & Park, Y.H. (2003) Researcher contributions and fulfillment of ICMJE authorship criteria: analysis of author contribution lists in research articles with multiple authors published in radiology. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Radiology 226: 16–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ward, B. (1994) Undue credit for supervisors. Nature 368: 579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Yank, V. & Rennie, D. (1999) Disclosure of researcher contributions: a study of original research articles in The Lancet. Annals of Internal Medicine 130: 661–670.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Marusic, A. & Marusic, M. (1999) Small scientific journals from small countries: breaking from a vicious circle of inadequacy. Croatian Medical Journal 40: 508–514.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Marusic, A., Misak, A., Kljakovic-Gaspic, M. & Marusic, M. (2002) Educatione ad excelentiam — ten years of the Croatian medical journal. Croatian Medical Journal 43: 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Moulopoulos, S.D., Sideris, D.A. & Georgilis, K.A. (1983) For debate ... Individual contributions to multiauthor papers. British Medical Journal (Clinical Research Ed.) 287: 1608–1610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Rennie, D. & Flanagin, A. (1994) Authorship! Authorship! Guests, ghosts, grafters, and the two-sided coin. Journal of the American Medical Association 271: 469–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Rennie, D., Yank, V. & Emanuel, L. (1997) When authorship fails. A proposal to make contributors accountable. Journal of the American Medical Association 278: 579–585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Drenth, J.P. (1998) Multiple authorship: the contribution of senior authors. Journal of the American Medical Association 280: 219–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Riesenberg, D. & Lundberg, G.D. (1990) The order of authorship: who’s on first? Journal of the American Medical Association 264: 1857.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Horton, R. (1998) The unmasked carnival of science. Lancet 351: 688–689.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Marusic, A. & Marusic, M. (2003) Teaching students how to read and write science: a mandatory course on scientific research and communication in medicine. Acad Med 78: 1235–1239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vedran Katavić.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Marušić, M., Božikov, J., Katavić, V. et al. Authorship in a small medical journal: A study of contributorship statements by corresponding authors. SCI ENG ETHICS 10, 493–502 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-004-0007-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-004-0007-7

Keywords

Navigation