Skip to main content
Log in

Ethical decision-making in research: Identifying all competing interests

Commentary on “six domains of research ethics” (K.D. Pimple)

  • Published:
Science and Engineering Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ethical dilemmas are the result of conflicts between potential benefits or harms for two or more competing interests. Therefore, ethical decision-making implies a responsibility to identify those interests, harms, and benefits. For this purpose, researchers have responsibilities to the research, the subjects of research, other researchers, the institution, society, the environment, and self.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pimple, K.D. (2002) Six Domains of Research Ethics: A Heuristic Framework for the Responsible Conduct of Research, Science and Engineering Ethics 8(2): 191–205.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bebeau, M.J. with Pimple, K.D., Muskavitch, K.M.T., Smith, D.H. (1995) Moral Reasoning in Scientific Research: A Tool for Teaching and Assessment, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Kalichman Ph.D..

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kalichman, M. Ethical decision-making in research: Identifying all competing interests. SCI ENG ETHICS 8, 215–218 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-002-0021-6

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-002-0021-6

Keywords

Navigation